36C24919Q0035-005.docx

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) & Recycling Services, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (TVHS), NCO 9

PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS

The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee has issued a solicitation to provide Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) & Recycling Services.

Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee.

The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Offeror shall only submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Section A of the questionnaire as provided to the assessors.

Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.

Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than Nov 27, 2018. Assessor is requested to send electronically to tara.hammrich@va.gov. Assessor: Please so not sent this information to the Offeror being evaluated.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)

1. Prospective Government Contractor’s______________________________________

2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________

3. Phone number (with area code):___________________________________________

4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________

5. Description of Services provided under contract: ________________________________________________________________________

6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____

7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee (Signature)

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors.

RATING SCALE Definitions

EXCEPTIONAL (E)

Risk Factor: Very Low.

Based on the Offeror's performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the requirement. Past performance has met contractual requirements and has exceeded some of the respondent's benefit. Performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD (V)

Risk Factor: Low Based on the Offeror's performance record, little doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has met contractual requirements and has exceeded some to the respondent's benefit. Contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problem(s) for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY (S)

Risk Factor: Moderate Based on the Offeror's performance record, some doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has met contractual requirements. Contractual performance contains some minor problem(s) for which corrective action(s) taken by the contractor appear or where satisfactory.

MARGINAL (M)

Risk Factor: High Based on Offeror's performance record, substantial doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has not met some contractual requirements. Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which either the contractor has not yet identified correction action(s), or the proposed corrective action(s) appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY (U)

Risk Factor: Very High Based on Offeror's performance record, extreme doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Past performance has not met most contractual requirements, and recovery did not occur or was not in a timely manner. Contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective action(s) appear or were ineffective.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. E V S M U N

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. E V S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

SCHEDULE

1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements. E V S M U N

2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.

Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely? E V S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.) E V S M U N

2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). E V S M U N

3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. E V S M U N

4. Rate the contractors responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. E V S M U N

5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. E V S M U N

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.

VII. General Comments:

ASSESSOR:

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

OTHERS