36C24520R0082-004.pdf

PDF Posted

Attached to
C1DA--Renovate and Expand for Clinical Services Addition
Solicitation number
36C24520R0082
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and statement of work for architect and engineering services for the renovation and expansion of clinical services at the Hershel Woody Williams VA Medical Center in Huntington, West Virginia. The project involves designing a new three-story clinical addition of 26,000 square feet and renovating up to 13,700 square feet of existing space, with potential additional space on a fourth floor for HVAC. Services required include design, surveys, hazardous materials handling, and construction period support. The performance period is between May 2020 and May 2023. The award will be a firm-fixed-price contract set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. The value is estimated between $10-20 million. Responses are due by May 15, 2020.

36C24520R0082 Attachment 4_PPQ.pdf

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24520R0082-0001000.docx DOCX document
36C24520R0082-000.docx DOCX document
36C24520R0082-003.pdf PDF
36C24520R0082-001.pdf PDF
36C24520R0082-002.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Synopsis Attachment 4 Project Name: Renovate and Expand for Clinical Services Project Number: 581-306

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: __________________________________________

B. Contract number: ______________________________________

C. Contract type: ______________________________

D. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

E. Period of performance:

F. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

G. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

H. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

I. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ___________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR

IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: ____________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: _____________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: _________________________________________________

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: __________

Name of Firm Evaluated

Name of person completing evaluation

Job title of person completing evaluation

Evaluator’s contact info – phone & e-mail

Evaluator’s Company (or Gov’t Entity) Name

Evaluator’s Company (or Gov’t Entity)

City & State

Type of work Performed by Evaluated Firm

(i.e.: investigation, design, construction inspection, etc.)

Brief description of the project: ___________________________________________________

Initial contract fee

Final amount paid

Year work began

Year work was completed

Was the work completed on time? __________ If not, why not? ________________________

Was the initial fee reasonable?

Was the final fee, including all modifications, reasonable?

Was the work as thorough and detailed as expected or desired?

For the following questions, use this rating scale: Violet = Outstanding, Blue = Good, Green =

Acceptable, Yellow = Marginal, Red = Unacceptable and N/A = Not applicable

Violet Blue Green Yellow Red N/A

How was the quality of any draft or intermediate submittals?

How was the quality of the final submittal?

How well did this firm examine alternatives, if applicable (Examined all reasonable alternatives? Evaluations of alternatives well reasoned?)

Were cost estimates prepared by this firm detailed and accurate?

If this firm produced a design, was the cost of the construction project kept within budget?

If questions arose regarding the firm’s work or if errors or omissions were found, after payment of the final invoice, how willing was the firm to answer those questions or correct those errors?

Was this firm cooperative and responsive to your needs and goals?

Did you feel the employees were highly qualified and knowledgeable?

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

SUBCONTRACTOR CONSENT:

We are currently participating as (CIRCLE ONE ANSWER): member of a joint venture, subcontractor, teaming partner, or key person with the prime contractor identified above in response to the referenced Request for Proposal. We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process, we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss or performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

________________________ (Signature) ________________________ (Name and

Title)

(Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to: Ms. Alison Klein Mailing Address: Louis A Johnson VAMC Attn: 90C 1 Med Center Dr., Clarksburg, WV 26301

E-Mail: alison.klein@va.gov

Fax:304-623-7637

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .