Attachment B Past Performance Form 3.pdf
PDF 170 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24426Q0925
About this file
This is a Past/Present Performance Questionnaire form for solicitation number 36C24426Q0925 related to Butler VAMC in Pennsylvania. The form is used to evaluate contractor performance on existing or past contracts and must be submitted to ENRICO.TAN1@VA.GOV with the solicitation number and contractor name referenced in the subject line.
The questionnaire requires completion of contractor identification information including contract number, period of performance, negotiated price or cost at award, current estimated contract dollar amount, and description of services acquired. Evaluator information must also be provided, including name, organization, phone number, evaluator role (such as Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, or Contracting Officer's Technical Representative), and time on contract. The form assesses performance across three primary elements: (1) Quality of Services/Care, addressing the contractor's ability to provide therapeutic and rehabilitative services in a safe environment to homeless eligible Veterans, including meals, transportation, laundry facilities, gender-specific accommodations, and ADA accommodations; (2) Qualified Personnel, evaluating the contractor's ability to provide qualified personnel including experienced managers and supervisors; and (3) Business Relations, assessing the contractor's willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues, ability to correct problems timely, initiative and flexibility, and quality of working relationships with agency staff. Each element requires a narrative statement and an adjectival rating (Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory). The form also includes sections for identifying overall contractor strengths and weaknesses, determining whether the evaluator would award to the contractor again, and providing an overall Past/Present Performance rating with supporting narrative for any Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment A RM Language for Contracts.pdf | ||
| 36C24426Q0925 SF 1449 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24426Q0925_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24426Q0925 SF 1449.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B Past Performance Form 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A RM Language for Contracts.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24426Q0925.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24426Q0925
Butler VAMC, PA
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND PAST
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. ONCE EVALUATION IS COMPLETED, SUBMIT FORM
TO ENRICO.TAN1@VA.GOV AND REFERENCE ABOVE SOLICITATION NUMBER
AND CONTRACTOR NAME IN SUBJECT LINE:
I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:
Contractor:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
Negotiated price or cost at award:
Current estimated contract dollar amount:
Describe service acquired:
II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Name:
Organization:
Phone Number:
(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, other, etc.)
Time on Contract:
III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under Paragraphs III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past / Present Performance adjectival rating under par. III.F based on the Adjectival Rating Descriptions below. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.
PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.
mailto:enrico.tan1@va.gov
EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements with most exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
A. Quality of Services / Care
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide therapeutic and rehabilitative services in a safe environment to homeless eligible Veterans. Provides quality of services including meals, transportation, laundry facilities, gender specific accommodations in the performance of the contract, and ADA accommodations.
2. Rating for Quality of Services / Care: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
B. QUALIFIED PERSONNEL:
1. Narrative: Describe the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors).
2. Qualified Personnel: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a
Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
C. BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff?
2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
D. IDENTIFY THE CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES:
E. GIVEN THE CHOICE, WOULD YOU AWARD TO THIS CONTRACTOR AGAIN?
YES NO
If no, please explain:
F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING:
(Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):
Additional Comments:
Name/Signature Date
Title
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .