36C24219R0172-003.docx

DOCX document Posted

Attached to
Repair Steam and Condensate Lines
Solicitation number
36C24219R0172
Issued by

About this file

This announcement solicits qualifications from engineering firms for repairing steam and condensate lines at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Lyons, New Jersey. The project scope involves modifying steam manholes, replacing sub pumps and expansion sleeves, rerouting piping, and modifying condensate pumps. Design services are required to prepare specifications, drawings, cost estimates and other documents. The estimated construction cost is between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000. Responses are due by August 14, 2019. The award date is anticipated to be by September 30, 2019. The contract will be a firm fixed price agreement. This opportunity is open only to verified Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. At least 50% of contract performance costs must be expended on employee wages for the prime contractor or other eligible VOSBs.

36C24219R0172 ATTACHMENT 1 Past Performance Questionnaire NJ.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C24219R0172-001.doc DOC document
36C24219R0172-002.docx DOCX document
36C24219R0172-004.docx DOCX document
36C24219R0172-000.docx DOCX document
36C24219R0172-003.docx DOCX document
36C24219R0172-000.docx DOCX document
36C24219R0172-001.doc DOC document
36C24219R0172-004.docx DOCX document
36C24219R0172-002.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please send this questionnaire to at least three (3) projects identified in your firm’s SF 330 Section F, Example Projects which best illustrate proposed team’s qualifications for this work. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question. IF PAST PERFORMANCE ACASS/CPARS IS NOT AVAILABLE, THEN OFFEROR TO SEND THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO MINIMUM OF 3 PRIOR CLIENTS AS LISTED IN SF330. OFFEROR TO PLACE THEIR NAME IN RESPECTIVE BLANK SPACES BELOW, AS INDICATED “AE NAME” “AE FIRM TO BE EVALUATED.”

Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

FROM: _________________________________

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):

AE Name____________________________________ is currently responding to VA Medical Center Northport request for SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications for the “Repair Steam and Condensate Lines, Project #561A4-18-106,” at Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lyons NY. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding ____________________AE Name________________ performance.

Recommender Name___________________________________ is providing past performance data to Lyons VA Medical Center relating to our performance on contracts and have identified Recommender Contact______________________________________ as the points of contact for these contracts.

The request for SF 330 instructs that respondents provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire and submit it by email, regular mail or delivery service by August 14, 2019 11:59 PM ET, directly to the VA Contracting Officer, Joseph Ercole, at:

Joseph Ercole Contracting Officer U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs 79 Middleville Rd., Bldg. 10, Section 138, Rm. 216 Northport, NY 11768 joseph.ercole@va.gov

The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to AE Name____________________. Please direct any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire to Joseph Ercole, Contracting Officer, at point of contact identified above.

A. GENERAL INFORMATION (CONTD’)

A-E FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:

Firm Name: _________________________ Telephone: _________________________ Address: _________________________ Email: ____________________________ Point of Contact: _____________________ Firm Cage Code: _____ Firm Tax ID Number: ________ Firm DUNS Number: ________

Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:

Contract Number: ______________________ Dollar Amount: ______________________

Contract Period of Performance: ___

The A-E Firm performed as the ☐ Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member

Percent of work performed by A-E Firm: __% Other (Please describe)

EVALUATOR INFORMATION:

Evaluator’s Company or Agency Name: ________________________ Evaluator’s Name: ________________ Address: ________________________ Title of Evaluator: ________________ ________________________ Telephone: ____________________ E-mail: ______________________

1. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Exceptional and Marginal-Unsatisfactory on page 7 under Narrative Summary.

See below-

Exceptional (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Marginal (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A
-Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective or corrective actions taken were effective.
-Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective.
-Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems. Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective.
-Performance does or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected serious problems(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions or did not provide acceptable corrective actions.
-Performance does or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or did not occur. The contractual performance contains or contained serious problem (s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective.
-Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area.

A-E FIRM’S NAME: ______________________ PROJECT NAME: ____________

Contract Period of Performance: ___

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

C. Using the Performance Information Descriptions in ‘B’ above, place an “X” in the appropriate columns using the definitions matrix in ‘B’ above.

Item

FACTORS TO BE RATED

Exceptional (5)
Very Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Marginal (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
N/A

Design Services:

1.
Overall skill level and technical competence of A/E’s personnel.
2.
A/E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously.
3.
A/E’s responsiveness to design review questions.
4.
A/E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team
5.
Coordination and control of subcontractors
6.
Overall accuracy, completeness and coordination of final design documents. (Quality)
7.
A/E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates.
8.
A/E’s ability to meet contract schedule.
9.
Cooperation and responsiveness
10.
Management of Resources/Personnel
11.
A/E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff
12.
Compliance with regulations
13.
Professional conduct
14.
Changes activity/Change order(s) requested
15.
Adequacy of work force
16.
Met/corrected deficiencies, if any
17.
Good faith effort made along complete project

Follow-On Construction Support Services:

18.
Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals.
19.
Timely resolution of construction design issues.
20.
Overall quality, responsiveness and timeliness of A/E follow-on construction support services.

LEED (If Applicable):

21.
Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation.
22.
A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process.

BIM (If Applicable):

23.
Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation.
24.
A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process.

Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If Applicable):

25.
Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents.
26.
A/E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness and support as Owner’s Representative throughout the project.

Overall:

27.
How would you rate the A/E’s ability to control cost?
28.
How would you rate the A/E’s overall management performance on this contract?
29.
How would you rate the A/E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract?
30.
Would you use this A/E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary)
YES

NO

Number of A/E Design Errors & Omissions on Project: _______________

Increased Project Cost Due to A/E Design Errors & Omissions: _______________

A-E FIRM’S NAME: ______________________ PROJECT NAME: ____________

Contract Period of Performance: ___

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

D. NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain any rating from the previous pages, especially 5 Exceptional and 1 Unsatisfactory and N/A-Not Applicable)

Item
COMMENTS

Add more rows as needed

SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE TO:

Joseph Ercole, Contracting Officer, NCO2 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs 79 Middleville Rd. Section 138, Bldg. 10, Rm. 216 Northport, NY 11768 OR BY EMAIL: joseph.ercole@va.gov This information is per:

VA Policies and Regulations, Information Letter 001AL-10-03 at:

http://www1.va.gov/oamm/docs/library/ils/il10-03.pdf

VA Policies and Regulations, Information Letter 90-01-2 at: http://www1.va.gov/oamm/oa/ars/policyreg/ils/il01_2.cfm

FAR 12.206 states that a contractor's past performance should be an important element of every evaluation and contract award for commercial items;

FAR 42.1501 states that past contractor performance information should include, among other relevant information, the contractor's adherence to contract schedules.

Acquisition Reform Network website, http://www.ARNet.gov; website, the Office of Procurement Policy (OFPP) has posted a best practices guide entitled, "Best Practices for Collecting and Using Current and Past Performance Information."

The revised guidance leaves this matter at the discretion of the agencies. Acquisition professionals should note that, FAR Subpart 15.305(a)(2)(iv) states that the lack of a past performance history may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably.

FAR Part 36 applies to architect and engineering services.

-END-

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .