36C10X19Q0200-019.pdf

PDF 84 KB Posted

Attached to
External Clinical Peer Review for Quality Management BPA (VA-19-00058098)
Solicitation number
36C10X19Q0200
Issued by

About this file

36C10X19Q0200 Attachment K - InterRater Reliability.pdf

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C10X19Q0200-0002000.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-0001000.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-016.pptx PPTX presentation
36C10X19Q0200-007.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-022.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C10X19Q0200-001.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-014.doc DOC document
36C10X19Q0200-020.xls XLS spreadsheet
36C10X19Q0200-012.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-017.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-009.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-021.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-010.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-011.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-002.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-008.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-018.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-005.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C10X19Q0200-006.docx DOCX document
36C10X19Q0200-015.pdf PDF
36C10X19Q0200-013.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Criteria for Inter‐Rater Reliability (IRR) Study

1) Include all panel members

2) Will include time frames.

3) Including what benchmarks are:

a. Passing

b. Failing

c. Require Remediation

4) What constitutes remediation

5) When will reassessments occur for those reviewers that do not pass the IRR

6) When will a provider be removed from the panel

Potential Example of Study

This method is continuous. A Point system is implemented for each reviewer. A point is earned by a reviewer for:

1) Each 2 Level discordance (PRC level 1: Reviewer level 3 or PRC level 3; Reviewer level 1)

2) Each Facility/VISN/VACO concern of inappropriate review

When 3 points are earned, VENDOR Medical Director will assess those cases. If the Medical Director agrees with the reviewer, 0 marks given. If the Medical Direct disagrees with the reviewer’s assessment

1 mark is given. If there are 2 marks, the reviewer has failed the IRR, and will need remediation.

Reassessment will occur each time 3 points are earned by a reviewer. If a reviewer is remediated 2 times within a rolling 12 months, that reviewer will be considered for removal from the panel.

File details come from the government source that posted it.