36C10G18Q0127-004.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 36C10G-18-Q-0127 for Academic Detailing
Solicitation number
36C10G18Q0127
Issued by

About this file

36C10G18Q0127 Attachment 3 Academic Detailing Outreach Visit Assessment.docx

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
36C10G18Q0127-00001000.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0127-003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C10G18Q0127-001.pdf PDF
36C10G18Q0127-002.docx DOCX document
36C10G18Q0127-000.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Academic Detailing (AD) Outreach Visit Assessment Detailer name:

Date:

Type of session:

Poor or not addressed
Fair
Good
Excellent
N/A
Average score**
Introduction
1. Introduced themselves and/or summarized last visit and asked about experiences or progress made
1
2
3
4
2. Clearly stated the reason/purpose for the visit
1
2
3
4
3. Verified time available/allotted for appointment
1
2
3
4

Comments:

Needs assessment
1. Used open-ended questions to gain an understanding of current practice/management strategies
1
2
3
4
2. Identified and managed barriers/objections
1
2
3
4
3. Discussed at least 1 key message but did not overwhelm the provider with too many key messages
1
2
3
4
4. Used AD techniques (e.g. EPE, 3Fs, reflections) to engage clinician in discussion
1
2
3
4
5. Resisted the righting reflex (avoided phrases like: “yes, but”, “but what about”, “have you tried”)
1
2
3
4

Comments:

Poor or not addressed
Fair
Good
Excellent
N/A
Average score**
Summary & Close
1. Summarized key items discussed
1
2
3
4
2. Obtained commitment from the clinician to implement a change in behavior(s)
1
2
3
4
3. Asked if there were additional questions/concerns
1
2
3
4
4. Thanked the provider for his/her time
1
2
3
4
5. Identified plan for follow-up (e.g. future appt)
1
2
3
4

Comments:

Overall Review of Detail Visit
1. The detailer’s body language, tone and/or eye contact seemed appropriate
1
2
3
4
2. The provider seemed engaged
1
2
3
4
3. Overall, the encounter embodied the elements of a successful AD visit
1
2
3
4
4. To the best of your judgment, this detail session resulted in building/maintaining a positive relationship with the clinician
Extremely unlikely

Unlikely Likely Extremely Likely

5. To the best of your judgment, this detail session will result in a change in behavior
Extremely unlikely

Unlikely Likely Extremely Likely

Comments:

Total Score*

*Total score may be used to assess academic detailing performance over time (e.g. improving skills = increase in total score). Disclaimer: total score has not been directly associated with academic detailing success; **Average Score may be used to help identify a weakness or area needed for improvement within the academic detailing visit

File details come from the government source that posted it.