3-Attachment C Scoresheet PostConvictions.xls
XLS spreadsheet 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Post-Conviction Relief Act Litigation Services
- Solicitation number
- TR27-2
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a scoresheet attachment used by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing and Department of Criminal Justice for evaluating proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal for Post-Conviction Relief Act Litigation Services. The procurement seeks to contract with responsive and responsible vendors to provide litigation services related to post-conviction relief matters. The contract term is three years with an anticipated end date of November 14, 2029. It is anticipated that multiple contract awards will be made to vendors that meet the minimum technical score threshold established in the evaluation criteria.
The scoresheet serves as the primary evaluation tool for assessing vendor qualifications and proposal quality against defined technical criteria. Firms that currently hold a contract for these services with the same end date of November 14, 2029 are not required to submit a response to this RFP, indicating an opportunity to maintain continuity with existing incumbents. The evaluation and award process will utilize the scoresheet to ensure consistent and objective assessment of all proposals received, with awards granted only to those vendors demonstrating sufficient technical capability and meeting all responsiveness requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Attachment B SOW PostConvictions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-Attachment A Terms.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Post-Conviction Relief Act (PRCA) Litigation Services | ||
| EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information | ||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| Offeror must confirm: |
they have an Active Status Utah State Bar License they are currently in good standing with the Utah State Bar they will track hourly work using case management software to track the appeal assigned they will submit timely, monthly invoices for payment that they will maintain and provide proof of professional malpractice insurance with at a minimum, limits of no less than $250,000.00 per claim and $500,000.00 per occurrence they are willing to work on appeals for amounts listed in Attachment B - Scope of Work
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||
| Earned | Minimum Required | |||||||
| 1 | Statement of Interest and Similar Cases | 40 | 40.0% | 200.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 2 | Resume | 60 | 60.0% | 300.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 100.0% | 500.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |||
| 65% | 325.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .