27TALKT4 - Scorecard - final.docx

DOCX document 110 KB Posted

Attached to
27TALKT4 | Foundational Skills K-3 Curricular Materials Reviews | RFR
Solicitation number
BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-134219
Issued by
Essex County, Massachusetts

About this file

This is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard developed by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for solicitation 27TALKT4 (Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-134219). The solicitation requests proposals from organizations to provide publicly available reviews and ratings of foundational skills instructional materials for grades K-3. The materials must address print concepts, phonological awareness, phonics and decoding, automatic word recognition, and fluency. Bidders must demonstrate that they have reviewed or have plans to review foundational skills curricula commonly used nationwide and in Massachusetts, and must confirm availability for periodic communication with DESE to make Massachusetts-specific information available on their website.

The evaluation scorecard employs a tiered scoring system with required qualifications that bidders must satisfy to advance to the additional evaluation criteria section. Required qualifications include demonstrated publicly available reviews of foundational materials, identification and exclusion of materials relying on three-cueing/MSV methodology, curriculum review experience, and vendor availability for ongoing DESE communication. The additional evaluation criteria are scored on a 0-5 point scale with multipliers of four, totaling 100 maximum points available. Evaluation categories assess organizational establishment and viability for five years, the thoroughness and transparency of the review process, focus on evidence-based literacy instruction across all research-based reading areas, structured reporting that allows DESE to establish clear approval designations, and capability to maintain an up-to-date product list through timely identification and review of new materials.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
IT RFR Required Specifications.doc DOC document
Q and A - COMMBUYS FINAL.docx DOCX document
27TALKT4 - Measures - final.docx DOCX document
Attachment B - Contact Form~1.docx DOCX document
27TALKT4 - Attachmnent A - final~1.docx DOCX document
27TALKT4 - Bid - final.docx DOCX document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
FY26 State Forms - April 2026.pdf PDF
DESE Required Language 10-2025.docx DOCX document
IP Language.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 | Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 | TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
Requirement 4: Bidder has publicly available reviews of foundational skills materials that address, across grades K-3: print concepts, phonological awareness, phonics and decoding, automatic word recognition, and fluency
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
Requirement 3d: Reviews identify and exclude materials that rely on three-cueing / MSV as a substitute for direct word identification (§1E½(b)).
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
Requirement 2: Bidder has reviewed, or has a plan to review, the foundational skills curricula most commonly used nationwide and in Massachusetts.
Yes |_|
No |_|
4
Submission Requirement 5: Vendor confirms availability for periodic phone calls with DESE and is willing to make Massachusetts-specific information available on the website.
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 27TALKT4 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-134219 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Requirement 1 / Submission requirement 1: Bidder is an established and respected organization and can demonstrate viability to continue to exist and publish reports for at least the next 5 years.
(x4)
20
2
Requirement 3a / Submission Requirement 2: Ratings/reviews of foundational skills materials are generated by a thorough, transparent, and consistent process.
(x4)
20
3
Reports and ratings of foundational skills materials and accompanying documentation are:

Requirement 3b: - Focused on evidence-based literacy instruction as defined in §1E½(a);

Requirement 3c: - Inclusive of all research-based reading areas for foundational skills as stated in the Scope of Service;

(x4)
20
4
Reports and ratings of foundational skills materials and accompanying documentation are:

•Requirement 3e: Structured to allow DESE to communicate a clear cut point for approval in Massachusetts (e.g., green/yellow/red or other clear-cut approval designation) •Requirement 3f: Visually appealing, easily navigable, and supportive of educators seeking information about products

(x4)
20
5
Submission Requirement 3: Process for identifying, scheduling, and reviewing new products and timeline for producing new reports supports Massachusetts’ ability to have a continuously up-to-date list.
(x4)
20
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.jpeg image2.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .