27TALJM1 Scorecard - Final.docx

DOCX document 112 KB Posted

Attached to
27TALJM1 | Advancing Statewide Implementation of the HQIM for NGESL Initiative | RFR
Solicitation number
BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-131584
Issued by
Middlesex County, Massachusetts

About this file

This is an evaluation criteria scorecard for the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), Office of Language Acquisition (OLA), used to assess responses to a Request for Response (RFR) for the Advancing Statewide Implementation of the HQIM for Next Generation ESL (NGESL) Initiative. The scoring document establishes nine required qualifications that bidders must satisfy to advance in the evaluation process, including demonstrated expertise in ESL curriculum design, WIDA 2020 ELD Standards Framework implementation, project management capacity, differentiated technical assistance provision, ESL instructional material evaluation, Massachusetts ELE requirements knowledge, implementation tool development, culturally and linguistically sustaining practices, and ADA-compliant resource development. The contract opportunity is covered under World Trade Organization (WTO) provisions and is identified by Alternate ID 27TALJM1 and COMMBUYS Document #BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-131584.

The scorecard allocates 100 total points across eight additional evaluation criteria weighted with multipliers ranging from one to four. Scoring follows a six-point scale from Non-Responsive (0 points) to Outstanding (5 points), with point values assigned based on the quality of application materials and demonstrated qualifications. The highest-weighted criteria addresses the project narrative describing detailed and viable service completion approaches and the implementation timeline aligned to quarterly milestones (20 points each), followed by the reasonableness and competitiveness of the all-inclusive budget proposal organized by service area and deliverables (15 points), and evidence of prior HQIM ESL curriculum review and professional learning initiative experience (15 points). Additional evaluation categories assess prior DESE collaboration experience, data collection and synthesis processes, work samples, resume qualifications, and budget organization, with lower individual point values assigned to these elements.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
27TALJM1 - Q and A - Final.docx DOCX document
DESE Required Language 10-2025.docx DOCX document
IT RFR Required Specifications.doc DOC document
Prompt Pay Discount - PPD Form.docx DOCX document
27TALJM1 - bid - Final.docx DOCX document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
27TALJM1 - Measures - Final.docx DOCX document
Small Business Program Plan Language.docx DOCX document
FY26 State Forms - April 2026.pdf PDF
Attachment B - Contact Form~1.docx DOCX document
27TALJM1 - Attachment A - Final.docx DOCX document
IP Language.docx DOCX document
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 | Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 | TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
Demonstrated expertise in ESL curriculum design and HQIM implementation as approved by DESE
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
Demonstrated expertise in WIDA 2020 ELD Standards Framework
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
Demonstrated strong project management capacity to coordinate multiple deliverables, timelines, stakeholder groups, communication structures, and ongoing progress monitoring throughout yearlong implementation and reporting cycles
Yes |_|
No |_|
4
Demonstrated experience providing differentiated technical assistance and implementation coaching to districts
Yes |_|
No |_|
5
Demonstrated expertise in ESL instructional material evaluation, review processes, producing state-level written reports, implementation summaries, and actionable recommendations
Yes |_|
No |_|
6
Demonstrated understanding of Massachusetts ELE requirements and DESE’s Targeted and Focused Monitoring (TFM)
Yes |_|
No |_|
7
Demonstrated experience developing implementation tools, protocols, and professional learning resources
Yes |_|
No |_|
8
Demonstrated expertise in culturally and linguistically sustaining instructional practices for multilingual learners
Yes |_|
No |_|
9
Demonstrated experience developing ADA-compliant and accessible educational resources and digital materials
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 27TALJM1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-131584 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Applicant demonstrates prior experience collaborating with DESE, OLA, CURATE, or statewide instructional materials review initiatives; experience supporting HQIMimplementation for multilingual learner programs across varied district contexts; and experience supporting Tiered Focused Monitoring (TFM) corrective action implementation, or district systems improvement planning
(x2)
10
2
Applicant's project narrative describes a detailed and viable approach to completing all required services and deliverables;
(x4)
20
3
Applican'ts FY2027 implementation timeline and work plan is aligned to quarterly milestones and deliverables
(x4)
20
4
Evidence of prior experience facilitating HQIM ESL curriculum review, QIM implementation, or statewide professional learning initiatives is strong and compelling;
(x3)
15
5
Applicant's proposed process for collecting and synthesizing implementation data, participant feedback, and technical assistance outcomes is practical and aligned to DESE goals
(x2)
10
6
Applicant's work samples indicate desired skill and experience
(x1)
5
7
Resumes indicate desired skill and experience
(x1)
5
8
Applicant's all-inclusive budget proposal organized by service area and deliverables is reasonable and competitive for each fiscal year.
(x3)
15
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.jpeg image2.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .