27NUTRL6 - Scorecard- final.docx

DOCX document 113 KB Posted

Attached to
27NUTRL6 | Dried Cranberries | RFR
Solicitation number
BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-130647
Issued by
Middlesex County, Massachusetts

About this file

This is an evaluation criteria scorecard prepared by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for the procurement of low-sugar dried cranberries. The solicitation (27NUTRL6) seeks a vendor to supply the Food & Nutrition Department with dried cranberries in two flavors—Fruit Punch and Raspberry Lemonade—made exclusively from cranberries grown and harvested in Massachusetts. The scorecard establishes the framework for evaluating all bidder responses and will be used by agency staff to assess vendor qualifications and suitability for contract award.

The evaluation process consists of two stages: required qualifications and additional evaluation criteria. Bidders must receive affirmative responses on all six required qualifications to advance, including adequate warehouse space and vehicles compliant with Massachusetts Department of Public Health Regulations 105 CMR 500.00 and 21 CFR Part 110.00, exceptional customer service capacity, product specification sheets, current state operating license under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 94 Section 305 C, documented Continuity of Operations Plan with Food Defense and Food Recall Procedures, and a detailed company profile. The additional evaluation criteria are weighted on a 100-point scale: contractor financial resources (25 points), unit cost reasonableness (25 points), contract manageability including location and delivery logistics (20 points), previous relevant experience and department performance (20 points), and Massachusetts location preference (10 points). Scoring uses a rubric ranging from zero points for non-responsive submissions to five points for outstanding qualifications, with multipliers applied to each criterion category.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
27NUTRL6 - Q and A - FINAL.docx DOCX document
DESE Required Language 10-2025.docx DOCX document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
27NUTRL6 - FEE SHEET - final.docx DOCX document
27NUTRL6 - Attachment A - Final.docx DOCX document
Attachment B - Contact Form~1.docx DOCX document
27NUTRL6 - Bid - final.docx DOCX document
FY26 State Forms - April 2026.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 | Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 | TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
The bidder has sufficient space to warehouse and vehicles to protect all products in accordance with requirements outlined in Massachusetts Department of Public Health Regulations 105 CMR 500.00 and 21 CFR Part 110.00?
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
The bidder can provide exceptional customer service and sufficient warehouse and transportation staff to transport the product to MA State Contracted warehouse(s) per delivery frequency?
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
The bidder provided product specification/information sheet for product requested?
Yes |_|
No |_|
4
The bidder has a current license to operate in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 94, Section 305 C?
Yes |_|
No |_|
5
The bidder has a Continuity of Operations Plan, Food Defense Plan and Food Recall Procedures
Yes |_|
No |_|
6
The bidder provided a detailed company profile providing company background information, experience and qualifications, etc?
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 27NUTRL6 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-130647 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Contractor has sufficient financial resources to sustain operations.
(x5)
25
2
Unit costs are reasonable for the products provided.
(x5)
25
3
Contract is reasonable for the Department to manage (i.e. location: distance to travel; delivery schedule, ordering)
(x4)
20
4
Contractor's previous relevant experience, performance, and is in good standing with the Department.
(x4)
20
5
Contractor is located within the state of Massachusetts.
(x2)
10
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.jpeg image2.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .