26MAOSTBH1 - Scorecard - final~1.docx

DOCX document 112 KB Posted

Attached to
26MAOSTBH1 | Interpreter in Education Course Delivery - American Sign Language | MA for Districts
Solicitation number
BD-26-1026-DOE02-DOE01-123386
Issued by
Massachusetts

About this file

This is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard for the Massachusetts Department of Education's solicitation for Interpreter in Education Course Delivery focusing on American Sign Language instruction. The scorecard establishes the framework for evaluating vendor responses to bid on providing professional development courses to public school educators and districts. The solicitation requires bidders to demonstrate access to learning management systems capable of online course delivery, capacity to serve as fiscal agents for district billing, ability to collaborate with Department staff, and control of wheelchair-accessible facilities suitable for flexible instructional groupings if offering blended learning formats. Bidders must successfully meet all four required qualifications to advance to the scoring phase.

The evaluation employs a point-based scoring system with a maximum of 100 points across nine additional evaluation criteria, each assigned specific multipliers ranging from 1 to 5. Key scoring areas include staff qualifications and proficiency in English and ASL (20 points), established reputation and quality of proposed course delivery (5 points), demonstrated commitment to addressing racial inequities and cultural responsiveness (5 points), submission of required documentation on COMMBUYS (5 points), narrative describing relevant experience and positioning (25 points), detailed explanation of course registration and delivery methodology (20 points), instructor resumes demonstrating experience (10 points), non-instructor staff resumes (5 points), and detailed budget breakdowns by fiscal year with fee structures (5 points). Responses are scored using a six-tier rubric ranging from Non-Responsive (0 points) to Outstanding (5 points).

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
26MAOSTBH1 - Attachment A - Final.docx DOCX document
FY26 State Forms.pdf PDF
26MAOSTBH1 - Attachment B - final.docx DOCX document
26MAOSTBH1 - Bid - Final.docx DOCX document
IP Language.docx DOCX document
DESE Required Language 10-2025.docx DOCX document
26MAOSTBH1 - vendor-assurance - Final.docx DOCX document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
Small Business Program Plan Language.docx DOCX document
Attachment B - Contact Form~1.docx DOCX document
IT RFR Required Specifications.doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

135 Santilli Highway, Everett, Massachusetts 02149 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation) Updated 9-26-22

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
Access to technology necessary to provide the online format (LMS system and platform for registration)
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
If necessary, capacity to serve as a fiscal agent, billing individuals and districts for course enrollment. Districts must be able to pay via their usual procedures.
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
Ability to collaborate effectively with Department staff.
Yes |_|
No |_|
4
Control/access to a wheelchair accessible space which is large enough for vendor’s proposed maximum group size, with space and furniture that must be practicable for flexible instructional groupings, if applying to provide the Blended Learning format.
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggesting exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 26MAOSTBH1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-26-1026-DOE02-DOE01-123386 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Required Qualification:

Staff members with the requisite experience, expertise, and skills to deliver the services proposed, including an identified individual with demonstrated proficiency in English and ASL.

(x4)
20
2
Preferred Qualifications:

· Established reputation as a provider of professional development to public school educators.

· Quality of proposed course format, instructor experience, and prior experience providing related services

· Staff with experience interacting with public school districts and professional developers, capable of working with instructors, districts, and the Department to establish workable course schedules

· Direct experience working with interpreters or families who require interpretation

(x1)
5
3
Preferred Qualification:

Bidder provides evidence of activities focused on addressing racial inequities, articulates how their organization has and is currently working on supporting anti-racist mindsets, internal practices, and services/offerings, and bidder shares specific examples of how their services/offerings are culturally responsive and anti-racist.

(x1)
5
4
Attachment B – Cover page completed and submitted on COMMBUYS with Response.
(x1)
5
5
Narrative submitted provides additional qualifications and prior experiences in relevant services and explains how that experience better positions the applicant to be successful under this MA.
(x5)
25
6
Narrative provides information on how applicant will meet the scope, proposed method of course registrations and delivery in detail describing the systems procedures that will be utilized.
(x4)
20
7
Resume of person/s that will be working on this project in the role of instructor has been provided and outlines how goals of MA will be met based on previous experience etc…
(x2)
10
8
Resume of person/s that will be working on this project in the role other than instructor has been provided and outlines how goals of MA will be met based on previous experience etc…
(x1)
5
9
Budget provided broken out into each fiscal year of MA with a permissible range if applicable describing the fee structure.
(x1)
5
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.jpeg image2.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .