26-001_CalVCB_2026_RFI_Modernization_Solution_Attachment_1.docx

DOCX document 50 KB Posted

Attached to
RFI No. 26-001 Compensation and Restitution System Modernization
Solicitation number
0000040156
Issued by
Alameda County, Alpine County, Amador County, Butte County, Calaveras County, Colusa County, Contra Costa County, Del Norte County, El Dorado County, Fresno County, Glenn County, Humboldt County, Imperial County, Inyo County, Kern County, Kings County, Lake County, Lassen County, Los Angeles County, Madera County, Marin County, Mariposa County, Mendocino County, Merced County, Modoc County, Mono County, Monterey County, Napa County, Nevada County, Orange County, Placer County, Plumas County, Riverside County, Sacramento County, San Benito County, San Bernardino County, San Diego County, San Francisco County, San Joaquin County, San Luis Obispo County, San Mateo County, Santa Barbara County, Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz County, Shasta County, Sierra County, Siskiyou County, Solano County, Sonoma County, Stanislaus County, Sutter County, Tehama County, Trinity County, Tulare County, Tuolumne County, Ventura County, Yolo County, Yuba County, Alameda City, Alpine Village CDP, Amador City, Amador Pines CDP, Sutter Creek City, Butte Creek Canyon CDP, Butte Meadows CDP, Butte Valley CDP, Rancho Calaveras CDP, Colusa City, Contra Costa Centre CDP, Auburn Lake Trails CDP, El Dorado Hills CDP, Placerville City, South Lake Tahoe City, Fresno City, Kingsburg City, Orange Cove City, San Joaquin City, Shaver Lake CDP, Blue Lake City, Humboldt Hill CDP, Imperial City, Alta Sierra CDP, China Lake Acres CDP, Glennville CDP, Inyokern CDP, Kernville CDP, Lake Isabella CDP, Lake of the Woods CDP, Lakeside CDP, Hidden Valley Lake CDP, Lakeport City, Lower Lake CDP, North Lakeport CDP, Upper Lake CDP, East Los Angeles CDP, Elizabeth Lake CDP, Lake Hughes CDP, Lake Los Angeles CDP, Lakewood City, Los Angeles City, Marina Del Rey CDP, Monterey Park City, San Marino City, Sierra Madre City, Bass Lake CDP, Madera City, Madera Acres CDP, Madera Ranchos CDP, Yosemite Lakes CDP, Corte Madera Town, Lucas Valley-Marinwood CDP, Marin City CDP, Lake Don Pedro CDP, Mariposa CDP, Mendocino CDP, Merced City, University of California-Merced CDP, Lake City CDP, Crowley Lake CDP, June Lake CDP, Mammoth Lakes Town, Mono City CDP, Twin Lakes CDP, Virginia Lakes CDP, Marina City, Monterey City, Napa City, Lake of the Pines CDP, Lake Wildwood CDP, Nevada City, Lake Forest City, Orange City, Kings Beach CDP, Bucks Lake CDP, Lake Almanor Country Club CDP, Lake Almanor Peninsula CDP, Lake Almanor West CDP, Lake Davis CDP, Plumas Eureka CDP, Canyon Lake City, Lake Elsinore City, Lakeland Village CDP, Lake Mathews CDP, Lake Riverside CDP, Lakeview CDP, Riverside City, Orangevale CDP, Sacramento City, Big Bear Lake City, Lake Arrowhead CDP, San Bernardino City, Silver Lakes CDP, Spring Valley Lake CDP, Alpine CDP, Imperial Beach City, Lake San Marcos CDP, Rancho San Diego CDP, San Diego City, San Diego Country Estates CDP, San Francisco City, Lake Nacimiento CDP, San Luis Obispo City, Emerald Lake Hills CDP, San Mateo City, South San Francisco City, Santa Barbara City, University of California-Santa Barbara CDP, Santa Clara City, Santa Cruz City, Lakehead CDP, Shasta CDP, Shasta Lake City, Sierra Brooks CDP, Sierra City CDP, Sierraville CDP, Lake Shastina CDP, Mount Shasta City, Sonoma City, Sonoma State University CDP, Monterey Park Tract CDP, Orange Blossom CDP, Sutter CDP, Yuba City, Lake California CDP, Rancho Tehama Reserve CDP, Tehama City, Trinity Center CDP, Trinity Village CDP, East Tulare Villa CDP, Tulare City, Mono Vista CDP, Phoenix Lake CDP, Pine Mountain Lake CDP, Sierra Village CDP, Tuolumne City CDP, Lake Sherwood CDP, West Sacramento City, Yolo CDP, Plumas Lake CDP, California

About this file

This is a Request for Information (RFI) Response Worksheet issued by the California Victim Compensation Board (CalVCB) for RFI 26-001 regarding modernization of the Compensation and Restitution System (CaRes). CalVCB seeks qualified vendors to provide innovative solutions to replace its current claims processing system, which captures, processes, and manages victim compensation claims from application through payment. The RFI response package must not exceed 10 pages, single-spaced in 12-point font with one-inch margins, and must be submitted to ITAcquisitions@victims.ca.gov. Respondents are required to provide detailed information across six primary sections: company background and experience, proposed solution description, integration capabilities, implementation approach with timelines and examples from the past five years, technical support and security compliance details, and costing models including implementation, product, maintenance, support, and training expenses.

The worksheet requires vendors to address specific aspects of the CaRes modernization, including whether their solution is off-the-shelf or requires customization, scalability and flexibility for future compliance requirements, data validation and migration approaches, system upgrade and enhancement processes, and categorization of changes such as new benefit types, increased benefit limits, new program workflows, and technical modifications. Vendors must demonstrate experience implementing solutions with other government agencies and provide their approach to user acceptance testing, IT and functional support, and compliance with California's information technology and security standards as outlined in Attachment 2. No specific pricing information, set-asides, incumbent contractor details, or contract term parameters are provided in this worksheet document.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

California Victim Compensation Board

RFI 26-001

Attachment 1

ATTACHMENT 1

RFI RESPONSE WORKSHEET

INSTRUCTIONS: To respond to RFI 26-001, please include this RFI Response Worksheet and submit a completed response package as instructed in the RFI:

RFI responses must be submitted to the RFI Contact: ITAcquisitions@victims.ca.gov.

Your responses are needed to assist CalVCB in fully understanding the breadth of alternatives available to complete the modernization effort. Please provide detailed and specific responses to each question, with your total submission being no more than 10 pages, single spaced in 12-point font, with one-inch margins.

PART I: Company Information and Experience Company Name

Mailing Address

City, State, Zip

Website

Contact Person Name

Email

Phone

Title

By signing below, I certify the information in the response is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of the submittal.

Signature:

Date:

1. Provide a background about your company including its size and when it started.

2. Provide technical details about your solution including whether it is home grown or based on another organization’s platform.

3. Do you have experience implementing your solution with other government agencies? Please share the names of the state departments and what applications were implemented.

PART II: Solution

1. Describe your proposed solution. Please highlight in your solution the specific areas where, after reviewing the background and challenges, you believe your proposed approach can automate existing work or streamline current workflows.

2. Describe the product(s) and associated modules that will be included in your proposed solution.

3. Describe the scalability and flexibility of the proposed solution for meeting future information security, accessibility, maintenance, and platform changes and compliance requirements and standards.

4. Describe if the solution (product, process, or service) is off-the-shelf or requires configuration or customization to address the challenge statement.

PART III - Integration (Inputs and Outputs)

1. Describe the input/output capabilities of your proposed solution.

PART IV: Approach Project methodology and high-level timeline.

a. What is your overall approach to providing a solution?

b. What is a typical timeline for solution implementation? Please provide examples of implementations within the last 5 years.

c. What is your approach to understanding our business and creating a solution that meets our current needs and can easily adapt to our future needs?

d. What is your approach to User Acceptance testing?

Data migration

a. How will existing data be validated prior to migration?

b. What is your approach to data migration and what tools do you use?

c. Is data migration part of the cost or is it extra?

Updates and enhancements

a. How does your solution define system/platform upgrades?

b. What is the process for system/platform upgrades?

c. How often are upgrades made available?

d. How does your solution define enhancements?

e. What is the process for enhancement?

f. Do you have an enhancement schedule? If so, what is it?

g. How does your solution define configuration changes?

h. What is the process for configuration changes?

For each item described below, please indicate which category it applies to by placing an X or check mark in the appropriate column.

Description
System Upgrade
Enhancement
Configuration

New benefit type (service category) with multiple subtypes (service codes)

Increase the benefit limit for relocation expenses on a prospective basis

Implement the workflow for a new claims-adjacent program

Establishment of new data sets

Establishment or changes in role functions

Bulk data exchange

Direct data exchange

Global changes to the header in all letter templates

Add a new provider type with unique data elements not previously collected

Technical Support

a. Provide your approach for IT technical support services?

b. Provide your approach for functional support?

Security

a. Does the solution meet information technology and security standards as indicated in Attachment 2, Links to IT and Security Guidelines and Standards?

PART V – Costing Model

1. Please describe the estimated costing model and budgetary range of your proposed solution, including the implementation, product, maintenance, support, and training. Any sizing assumptions/constraints that affect the cost range/pricing model should be referenced.

PART VI - Evaluation

1. CalVCB wishes to thank you for your participation in the RFI process by providing us with your Response. If you have recommendations concerning this effort which have not been addressed by questions in this attachment or any additional requirements you think CalVCB should list that are not currently stated, please provide them below.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .