25RE010_Attachment 4_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 85 KB Posted

Attached to
Special Education (SPED) Student Transportation Services (STS) For DoDEA Schools in Hohenfels, Germany
Solicitation number
HE125425RE010
Issued by

About this file

The document is a Present and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a School Bus Services contract for the Hohenfels Military Community, issued by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA). The PPQ is part of solicitation HE125425RE010 for Special Education (SPED) Student Transportation Services in Hohenfels, Germany, and is designed to evaluate a contractor's past performance across ten key areas including student transportation, special needs student accommodations, safety services, vehicle management, incident response, vehicle maintenance, training, reporting, communication, and overall performance.

The solicitation requires offerors to submit a proposal via email to Zlata Dale and John Myers by 12:00 p.m. EDT on Friday, May 2, 2025. Prior to proposal submission, potential offerors must complete and submit a Non-Disclosure Agreement to receive route and commuting area information. Questions about the solicitation must be submitted electronically by 12:00 p.m. EDT on Friday, April 18, 2025. The contract is for commercial transportation services with NAICS code 485410, covering base year and four optional extension years, specifically focused on transporting pre-kindergarten through high school students, including those with special needs, in the Hohenfels military community in Germany.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

HE125425RE010 Attachment 4

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

This Questionnaire Pertains to: School Bus Services for Hohenfels Military Community

The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:

Department of Defense Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Ms. Zlata Dale Contracting Officer: Mr. John Myers 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350 E-Mail: zlata.dale@dodea.edu E-Mail: john.o.myers@dodea.edu

This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.

Contractor Information:
Firm Name: Click or tap here to enter text.CAGE Code: Click or tap here to enter text.
Address: Click or tap here to enter text.Unique Entity ID: Click or tap here to enter text.
Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text.Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text.
Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text.Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Sub Contractor ☐Joint Venture ☐Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed: Click or tap here to enter text.

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): Click or tap here to enter text.

Reference Information:
Business Name of Reference:Address: Click or tap here to enter text.

Click or tap here to enter text.

Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text.Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text.
Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text.Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Contract Number: Click or tap here to enter text. Final Contract Value: Click or tap here to enter text.

Contract Type: ☐Firm Fixed Price ☐Cost Reimbursement ☐Other (Explain)

Period of Performance: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

HE125425RE010 Attachment 4

This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.

Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:

P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
Poor/Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Neutral/N/A
Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.
Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.
No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available.

1. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with transporting pre-kindergarten through high school grade children from their designated bus stops to and from school in the school districts? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

2. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with transporting a special needs student with a Safety Aide and providing an appropriate vehicle from their designated stop to their school, and vice versa? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

3. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in providing a Safety Attendant and/or Safety Aide services on the school bus during runs? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

4. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in appropriately managing their personnel and vehicles (i.e. Has the Contractor been responsive to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections? Has the Contractor taken a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements?) Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

5. How would you rate the Contractor in responding to incidents and accidents in regards to transporting students on the bus? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

6. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in maintaining their vehicles in accordance with host nation laws and contractual requirements? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

7. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing, tracking and reporting required training? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

8. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

9. How would you rate the Contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

10. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

Present and Past Performance Questionnaire

HE125425RE010 Attachment 4

HE125425RE010 Attachment 4Explain any problems and resolutions Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.

Present and Past Performance Questionnaire

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .