24Q0024_ATTCH8_PPQ_3-29-24.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HE125424Q0024
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) related to Solicitation Number HE125424Q0024 for Seat Licenses for German I-II, AP Calculus AB, and AP Calculus BC.
The questionnaire asks the reference to provide an evaluation of the vendor's past performance in areas such as compliance with contract requirements, business practices, quality of services, and overall performance. The reference is asked to rate the vendor on a scale from Poor/Unsatisfactory to Excellent, and indicate whether they would purchase services from the vendor again. The reference is also provided an opportunity to give additional comments on the vendor's past performance.
The related federal contract opportunity is for commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) seat-based licenses for the specified courses, which must be accessible via single sign-on through DoDEA's learning management system. DoDEA prefers to make one award but expects to make multiple awards. Quotes are due by 0900 EST on May 3, 2024, and questions or concerns may be submitted by April 12, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 24Q024_ATTCH2TOS_3-29-24.docx | DOCX document | |
| 24Q0024_ATTCH4CloudQ_3-29-24.pdf | ||
| 24Q0024_ATTCH1_PRCINGSHEET_3-29-24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 24Q0024_ATTCH7_ARS_3-29-24.pdf | ||
| 24Q0024_Attach5_PrivacyChecklist_3-29-24.pdf | ||
| 24Q0024_Attach6_DD2930a_3-29-24.pdf | ||
| HE125424Q0024_SOL_3-29-24.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION Number:HE125424Q0024 Seat Licenses for German I-II, AP® Calculus AB, and AP® Calculus BC Present and Past Performance ATTACHMENT 08 Questionnaire
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Please complete the following questionnaire and return via email to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity
Contract Specialist: Jamie Formosa Contract Specialist e-mail: jamie.formosa@dodea.edu and Contracting Officer: Alim Koroma Contracting Officer e-mail: alim.koroma@dodea.edu
2. This Questionnaire Pertains to:
(Prime) Vendor Name
Reference Information Table Business Name of Reference & Address
Name Point of Contact
POC Phone number
POC E-mail address
Contract Value
Contract Number
Contract Type
Period of Performance
Brief Description of Effort/Scope of Work
3. Reference Section Part I:
Please refer to the Scope Verification above in Section 2. Is this description of the scope of work correct? If not, please amend it.
Have you encountered any significant problems with the company’s resources and/or support services? If so, please explain.
Reference Section Part II:
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 4 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral |
Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.
Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.
No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available
Directions: Double-click the box in the table to select a rating. Choose “checked” as “default value” to select the rating for each question.
1. How would you rate the vendor’s compliance with the delivery of contract deliverables or contract requirements?
Comments:
P/U|_| S|_| G|_| VG|_| E |_| N|_|
2. How would you rate the vendor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems)?
P/U|_| S|_| G|_| VG|_| E|_| N|_|
3. How would you rate the vendor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good quality of their resources and services provided?
4. How would you rate the vendor’s overall performance?
5. Would you purchase services from this vendor again?
|_| YES |_|NO
Please provide any additional comments applicable to the vendor’s past performance:
Thank you for taking the time to complete this past performance questionnaire.
Procurement Sensitive Source Selection Information-See FAR 3.104- Controlled Unclassified Information
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .