23R0109_AMD 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Firm Fixed Price

0001 2024MAR18

W56HZV

ACC-DTA

6501 E. 11 MILE RD.

DETROIT ARSENAL, MI 48397-5000

RICHARD HALL

EMAIL: RICHARD.G.HALL64.CIV@ARMY.MIL

W56HZV-23-R-0109

2024MAR13

X

X 2024APR17 11:59pm

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 8

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: RICHARD HALL

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-APS-D/(586)282-6634

Type of Contract 1: Firm Fixed Price

Kind of Contract: Supply Contracts and Priced Orders

Weapon System: Mortar, 120mm

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

Solicitation: W56HZV-23-R-0109

Amendment: 0001

1. The purpose of this amendment 0001 is to:

SF33: Extend proposal due date____

From: 15 April 2024

To: 17 April 2024

Section L:_________

a) Revise language in Section L 3.1.1.2 as follows:

From: Proposals that provide a delivery schedule that is later than 45 days after the required schedule identified in 52.211-8, Time of Delivery will constitute a failure to meet a stated requirement of the solicitation (deficiency) and be unawardable.

To: Proposals that provide a delivery schedule that is later than the required schedule identified in 52.211-8, Time of Delivery will constitute a failure to meet a stated requirement of the solicitation (deficiency) and be unawardable.

Section M:_________

a) Revise language in Section M.6.1.9

From: UNACCEPTABLE - Proposal provides a delivery schedule that is later than the required schedule by more than 45 days. Proposal is un-awardable.

To: UNACCEPTABLE- Proposal provides a delivery schedule that is later than the required schedule. Proposal is un-awardable.

2. Except as specifically stated above, all other terms and conditions of solicitation W56HZV-23-R-0109 remain unchanged.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0002 ***

2 8

W56HZV-23-R-0109

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 General Proposal Information

L.1.1 The proposal, subject to the Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal paragraph of Instructions to Offeror(s)

Competitive Acquisitions (FAR Provision 52.215-1) contained in Section L of the solicitation, shall be submitted in the format and quantities set forth below. All information necessary for the review and evaluation of a proposal is to be contained in the proposal.

Section M of the solicitation sets forth the evaluation criteria and delineates the Factors to be evaluated and their relative order of importance. The offeror's proposal, as required by this section, will be evaluated as set forth in Section M of this solicitation. The

Government will not assume the offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in its proposal. It is an offeror's responsibility to submit a well-written proposal, with adequately detailed information, which clearly demonstrates an understanding of and the ability to comply with the solicitation requirements to allow for a meaningful evaluation. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals.

L.1.2 Minimum Acceptance Period.

This provision supersedes any language pertaining to the acceptance period that may appear elsewhere in this solicitation (e.g. SF 33

Box 12).

ACCEPTANCE PERIOD means the number of calendar days available to the Government for awarding a contract from the date specified in this solicitation for receipt of offers.

L.1.2.1. The Government specified minimum acceptance period is 120 calendar days.

L.1.2.2. The offeror shall clearly state in its proposal the acceptance period. Offerors may specify a longer acceptance period than the

Government's minimum acceptance period stated above.

L.1.2.3. An offer allowing less than the Government's minimum acceptance period, or fails to provide a proposal acceptance period, may be rejected.

L.2 Proposal Content, Format and Instructions

L.2.1 Proposal Content

L.2.1.1 All proposals shall be in English (American Standard) and shall be in US dollars. Proposals not in English (American Standard) or in US Dollars may be rejected. The proposal shall include all information specified and shall address all requirements outlined in

Section L.

L.2.1.2 A Proposal Executive Summary or transmittal letter is optional. It will neither be considered as part of the proposal, nor will it be evaluated. If a Proposal Executive Summary is submitted, it should be no more than five pages in length.

L.2.2 Proposal Method of Submission, Format, and Instructions

L.2.2.1 The proposal shall be electronically submitted via E-mail to the Contract Specialist, Richard G. Hall, and cc the corresponding

Contracting Officer at the following e-mail address(s) with the subject header: Proposal Submission - W56HZV-23-R-0109 (company name):

Contract Specialist: Richard.G.Hall64.civ@army.mil

Contracting Officer: patricia.pierce3.civ@army.mil

Fax, hardcopy, and DVD/CD-ROM proposals will NOT be accepted. Hand-carried offers, whether hardcopy or electronic, will NOT be accepted.

Maximum size of each e-mail shall be 10 megabytes. The offeror may use multiple e-mail messages for each submission; however, it should annotate the subject lines as described above for each message, and number them in this manner: Message 1 of 3, 2 of 3, 3 of 3.

Note: There is no "expected" or "target" length of time for proposal submission via email; size and content may be factors, therefore offerors are strongly cautioned when submitting proposals to allow adequate time for submission.

L.2.2.1.1 Each submitted File shall be labeled so it is easily identifiable for which information it pertains.

L.2.2.1.2 Acceptable File Formats. All electronic information provided in response to the solicitation must be provided in Microsoft

(MS) Office 2013 compatible or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) format or except as noted in the proposal instructions below. For files in PDF format, scanners should be set to 200 dots per inch. The proposal shall not contain citations for, or active links to live

Internet sites or pages. All linked information shall be contained within the electronic proposal. Any linked information that is not contained in the proposal will not be accepted.

3 8

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

L.2.2.1.3 Electronic Files. The proposal electronic file name should not exceed 50 characters in length (not including the file extension). Ensure the file name does not contain any periods, does not contain spaces, and does not contain special characters, which should limit Government virus scanners rejecting the email as unscannable.

L.2.2.1.4 Unless otherwise specified, it is recommended that the proposal be formatted for 8.5 inch x 11 inch paper with a minimum font size of 10 pt. and with a minimum of 0.5 margins. Schedules, drawings and other documents more appropriate to larger size should be formatted for no larger than 8.5 inch x 14 inch dimensions.

L.2.2.1.5 If providing spreadsheets, include all formulas, function, macros, computations, or equations used to compute the proposed amounts. For each workbook, all Rows, Columns, Cells, and Worksheets are to be visible. Do not include Zero height and zero width rows and columns in Worksheets. Do not format Worksheet cells with the font color equal to the fill color. If Workbooks or Worksheets are password protected, then the passwords must be provided. Do not submit Print image files or pictures or files containing only values.

L.2.2.1.6 The offeror shall make every effort to ensure that the proposal is virus-free. Proposals (or portions thereof) submitted which indicate the presence of a virus, or which are otherwise rendered unreadable by damage in electronic transit, shall be treated as

"unreadable" as described in FAR 15.207(c).

L.2.2.2 Submission Due Date

The offeror must ensure its proposal, in its entirety, reaches the required destination before the date and time set for closing of the solicitation set forth in Block 9 on the SF 33, front page of the solicitation.

L.2.2.2.1 Lateness

The lateness rules for submitted proposals are outlined in FAR 52.215-1 "Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition and are incorporated into this solicitation.

L.2.3 Single Proposal Submission

Offerors are limited to submitting one proposal with one approach to meeting the requirements of this solicitation.

L.2.3.1 All or None

Offers in response to this solicitation must be submitted for all the requirements identified in the solicitation. Offers submitted for less than all the requirements called for by this solicitation may be rejected or ineligible for award. Proposals that contain alternative terms and conditions may be considered as taking exception to the requirements of the solicitation. See Section A.6.

L.3 Evaluation Factors

Offeror proposals shall address the following Factors:

a. Delivery Schedule Factor

b. Price Factor

L.3.1 Delivery Schedule Factor

The following applies to Delivery Schedule factors, unless otherwise noted below.

L.3.1.1 Offerors shall submit the following:

L.3.1.1.1 In order to be considered for award, a proposal must provide a delivery date expressed in terms of after date of delivery order award that is either 1) sooner than the required schedule identified in clause 52.211-8, Time of Delivery ; or 2) equal to the required schedule identified in clause 52.211-8, Time of Delivery.

L.3.1.1.2 Proposals that provide a delivery schedule that is later than the required schedule identified in 52.211-8, Time of Delivery will constitute a failure to meet a stated requirement of the solicitation (deficiency) and be unawardable.

L.3.1.2 If selected for award, the offerors proposed delivery date will be incorporated and become the requirement in any resulting contract.

L.3.2 Price Factor

L.3.2.1 In accordance with FAR 15.403-5(a)(1), certified cost or pricing data is not required for initial proposal submission. However, 4 8

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

after initial proposal submission, if only one offer is received, the Government reserves the right to request certified cost or pricing data in accordance with DFARS 252.215-7008. In the event certified cost or pricing data is required, the offeror may submit a written request for exception based on the applicable clauses contained herein.

For initial proposal submission, the offeror shall provide its proposed prices by providing a filled in Section B of the RFP.

L.3.2.2 The Government reserves the right to request additional or more detailed cost or price information to support its evaluation.

L.4 Provide the following information:

L.4.1 Signature Actions/offeror Fill-Ins. Provide a scanned image of a signed copy of the SF33 cover page, a copy of all completed fill-ins for Sections A through K, and (if applicable) a signed copy of all Amendments to the solicitation. System for Award Management (SAM) certifications need not be separately submitted; however, all offerors must be successfully registered and valid in SAM prior to award.

L.4.1.1 The offerors proposal acceptance period in terms of calendar days from the date for receipt of offers specified in the RFP. (See

Section L.1.2)

L.4.3 Statement of Acknowledgement. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions of the

RFP, and a statement of agreement to furnish and deliver the items or perform services set forth in the RFP in consideration for offerors proposed price(s) set opposite each item. Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents may be determined to be a Deficiency or grounds for the Government to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process (Reference M.5).

L.4.4 Assumptions. The offeror shall consolidate and identify all offeror's generated "assumptions" contained anywhere in the proposal.

The offeror shall include a statement that none of the "assumptions" contradict or take exception to any terms, conditions, or requirements of the solicitation. Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents may be determined to be a Deficiency or grounds for the Government to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process (Reference M.5).

L.4.5 If Government Property (as defined in 52.245-1) will be utilized in the performance of this contract, provide a description of your property management system, plan, and any customary commercial practices, voluntary consensus standards, or industry-leading practices and standards to be used by you in managing Government property in accordance with 52.245-1.

L.5 HQ-AMC LEVEL PROTEST PROCEDURES _______________________________

L.5.1 Complete AMC Protest Procedures can be found at: http://www.amc.army.mil/Connect/Legal-Resources/

L.5.2 An agency protest may be filed with either the contracting officer or to HQAMC but not both following the procedures listed on the website above.

L.6 PACKING/PACKAGING LEVEL FOR OPTION QUANTITIES

L.6.1 For purposes of computing a price for the option quantity specified in Section B of this solicitation and unless otherwise indicated in Section B, it is understood and agreed that the option unit price includes the same level(s) of packing/packaging as those that apply to the basic contract quantity.

*** END OF NARRATIVE L0001 ***

5 8

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

M.1.1 The Government will only award a contract to an offeror that meets all the responsibility criteria at FAR 9.104.

M.1.2 To make sure that an offeror meets the responsibility criteria at FAR 9.104 the Government may:

M.1.2.1 arrange a visit to the offerors plant and perform a preaward survey;

M.1.2.2 ask the offeror to provide financial, technical, production, or managerial background information.

M.1.3 If the offeror does not provide the Government with the data requested within 7 days from the date the requested is received, or if the offeror refuses to have an onsite visit to the offerors facility, the Government may determine the offeror to be nonresponsible.

M.1.4 If the Government visits the offerors facility, please make sure that current certified financial statements and other data relevant to the bid or proposal available for Government personnel to review.

M.2 Basis of Award

M.2.1 The solicitation is a 100% Small Business Set Aside. The Government plans to award a single firm-fixed price type contract for the

M191 Mortar Mount, NSN: 1015-01-521-1616, as a result of this solicitation. An award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government in accordance with the criteria set forth below and is eligible for award.

M.2.1.1 There are two evaluation factors:

M.2.1.2 a. Delivery

M.2.1.3 b. Price

M.2.1.4 The relative order of importance of these factors are described in M.5.1.4 below.

M.2.1.5 Proposal selection will be made utilizing the source selection trade-off process, considering the evaluation Factors and their relative order of importance (see Section M.5), to identify the proposal which represents the best value and is most advantageous to the

Government. The Government will weigh the evaluation factors (other than the Price Factor) against the total evaluated price to the

Government when selecting the offer that is most advantageous and represents the best overall value to the Government. The Government reserves the right to choose not to award a contract if such action is in the Governments best interest.

M.2.1.6 Importance of Cost/Price. Award will be made to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government and is otherwise eligible for award. This may not be the offeror with the lowest evaluated price. However, the closer offeror's evaluations are to each other in those Factors other than the Price Factor, the more important price becomes in the decision. Notwithstanding the relative order of importance of the evaluation Factors stated herein, price may be controlling when:

M.2.1.7 a. Proposals are otherwise considered approximately equal in non-price factors; or

M.2.1.8 b. An otherwise superior proposal is unaffordable; or

M.2.1.9 c. The advantages of a higher rated, higher priced proposal are not considered to be worth the price premium.

M.3 Rejection of Offers

M.3.1 The Government may reject any proposal if in the Government's best interest at any time after receipt of proposal. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following proposal conditions:

M.3.1.1 The proposal fails to meaningfully respond to the instructions in Section L of this solicitation (e.g., a proposal provides some data but omits significant material data and information required by Section L, the proposal fails to follow key proposal instructions or format requirements in Section L, etc.).

M.3.1.2 A proposal merely offers to perform work according to the solicitation terms or fails to present more than a statement indicating its capability to comply with the solicitation terms and does not provide support and elaboration as specified in Section L of this solicitation.

M.3.1.3 The proposal proposes exceptions to the RFP requirements, attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or solicitation terms and conditions.

M.3.1.4 The proposal is unbalanced as to price. See Section M.7.1.4

M.3.1.5 The proposal submitted is for less than all the requirements called for by the solicitation.

6 8

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

M.3.1.6 The proposals acceptance period does not meet the Governments required minimum acceptance period, or the offeror fails to provide a proposal acceptance period (Refer to Section L.1.2).

M.3.1.7 The proposal is not in English (American Standard) or in US Dollars.

M.4 Source Selection Process

M.4.1 Compliance Review. After receipt of proposals, but prior to the evaluation process, the Government will perform a compliance review of the offerors proposal to determine the extent of compliance to the solicitation instructions, and whether the proposal meets any of the conditions listed in M.3, Rejection of Offerors.

M.4.2 Evaluation Process. Selection of the successful offeror will be made following an assessment of each proposal not otherwise rejected, based on the response to the information called for in Section L of this RFP, and against the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria described herein. Proposals not otherwise rejected will be evaluated as specified herein, to include developing narrative support for the evaluation conclusions under each Factor.

M.4.3 Award without Discussions. This RFP includes FAR Provision 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors Competitive Acquisition in Section L which advises offerors that the Government intends to make award without conducting discussions. Where awards will be made without discussions, exchanges with offerors are limited to Clarifications as defined in FAR 15.306(a). Therefore, the offerors initial proposal should contain the offerors best terms from a Price and non-Price Factor standpoint. However, under FAR 52.215-1(f)(4), the Government reserves the right to hold discussions, if necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

M.5 Evaluation Criteria

M.5.1 There are two evaluation factors:

M.5.1.2 a. Delivery Schedule

M.5.1.3 b. Price

M.5.1.4 The relative order of importance of these two factors is as follows: The price factor is significantly more important than the delivery schedule factor.

M.6 Delivery Schedule Factor

M.6.1 The evaluation for the delivery schedule will be done at the CLIN level, and each evaluated CLIN will be a Delivery Schedule factor. The following CLINs will be evaluated:

0001AA

0001AB

M.6.1.2 The following applies to all Delivery Schedule factors, unless otherwise noted:

M.6.1.3 For purposes of this evaluation and the adjectival rating definitions below, the delivery schedule is the number of days after date of delivery order award.

M.6.1.4 Adjective Ratings & Descriptions:

M.6.1.5 OUTSTANDING - Proposal provides a delivery schedule that is sooner than required schedule in clause 52.211-8.

M.6.1.6 NOTE: If more than one offeror scores outstanding for this factor, the specific number of days that each schedule is sooner than the required schedule will be evaluated against the proposed price to determine which proposal provides the best value to the

Government.

M.6.1.7 ACCEPTABLE - Proposal provides a delivery schedule that is equal to the required schedule in clause 52.211-8.

M.6.1.8 NOTE: If more than one offeror scores acceptable for this factor, the proposed price will be used to determine which proposal provides the best value to the Government.

M.6.1.9 UNACCEPTABLE - Proposal provides a delivery schedule that is later than the required schedule. Proposal is un-awardable.

7 8

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

M.7 Price Factor

M.7.1 The Price Factor evaluation will result in a determination of the Total Evaluated Price to the Government. The Government will also evaluate the offerors price proposal for price reasonableness and unbalanced pricing. The following information will be used to determine the total evaluated price of the solicitation:

M.7.1.2 The unit price for each separately priced CLIN, will be multiplied by the estimated quantity for the corresponding CLIN and the results added together to produce the overall price; plus

M.7.1.3 Price Reasonableness: The Government will evaluate whether or not the offerors proposed price is reasonable. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. The Government may make a determination of price reasonableness by any means allowable under FAR 15.404-1.

M.7.1.4 Unbalanced Pricing: The Government will evaluate the Offerors proposal for unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over- or understated as indicated by the application of cost and price analysis techniques. Offerors are cautioned that a proposal the Government assesses to be unbalanced as to price, may either be rejected or determined unacceptable for award. See FAR 15.404-1(g) for more information on unbalanced pricing.

*** END OF NARRATIVE M0001 ***

8 8