23Q4009_SOL_ATTCH3_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Athletics Program Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HE125423Q4009
- Issued by
- Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document is a present and past performance questionnaire pertaining to athletic program services for the Department of Defense Education Activity in Guam. The questionnaire is to be completed by an offeror's reference to evaluate the offeror's performance on a past contract. It requests ratings on a scale of poor to excellent for the offeror's compliance with schedules, business practices, conforming to requirements, compliance with contract terms, commitment to customer satisfaction, and overall performance. The reference is also asked if it would purchase services from the offeror again and provide any additional comments on the offeror's past performance. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number HE125423Q4009 for athletic program services with the Department of Defense Education Activity.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HE125423Q4009-0002_SOL_AMEND2_071923.pdf | ||
| 23Q4009_SOL_ATTCH1_PWS_071923.pdf | ||
| HE125423Q4009-0001_SOL_AMEND1_071023.pdf | ||
| 23Q4009_SOL_ATTCH2_Technical_Capability.pdf | ||
| 23Q4009_SOL_ATTCH4_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| HE125423Q4009_SOL_062823.pdf | ||
| 23Q4009_SOL_ATTCH1_PWS_062623.pdf | ||
| 23Q4009_SOL_ATTCH5_WD 2015-5693_122722.pdf | ||
| 23Q4009_SOL_TE3_Historical Workload Data.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HE1254-23-Q-4009 Attachment XDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This Questionnaire Pertains to: Athletic Program Services, Guam
The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the complete PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:
Department of Defense Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Rosa I. Diaz Contracting Officer: Mileska M. Rodriguez 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350
E-Mail: rosa.diaz@dodea.edu E-Mail: mileska.rodriguez@dodea.edu
This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.
| Contractor Information: | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
Address: UEI Number::
Phone Number: E-mail Address:
Point of Contact: Point of Contact Number:
Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
Reference Information:
Business Name of Reference: Address:
Phone Number: E-mail Address:
Point of Contact: Point of Contact Number:
Contract Number: Final Contract Value:
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Period of Performance:
Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFQ.
Explain any problems and resolutions
This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral/N/A |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance. |
| Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance. |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| No record |
of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available.
| 1. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with the delivery schedule / performance milestones? Comments: |
| P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG |_| E |_| N |_| |
2. How would you rate the contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems etc.)? Comments:
P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG |_| E |_| N |_|
| 3. How would you rate the contractor’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship/quality of the product or service/timeliness of performance/report submission? Comments: |
| P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG |_| E |_| N |_| |
| 4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall compliance with the terms and conditions of your purchase order /contract? Comments: |
| P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG |_| E |_| N |_| |
| 5. How would you rate the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the contractor’s business-like concern for the interest of the customer? Comments: |
| P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG |_| E |_| N |_| |
| 6. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? Comments: |
| P/U |_| S |_| G |_| VG |_| E |_| N |_| |
| 7. Would you purchase services from this contractor again? Comments: |
| |_| YES |_| NO |
Please provide any additional comments applicable to the contractor’s past performance:
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .