23MACISCS3 - Scorecard - Final.docx
DOCX document 72 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- BD-23-1026-DOE02-DOE01-77927
- Issued by
- Middlesex County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard for the 23MACISCS3 | MTEL Test Preparation Departmental Master Agreement solicitation issued by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). The solicitation seeks bidders who can effectively support educator candidates in passing the Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure (MTEL). Required qualifications include demonstrating success in MTEL preparation and the ability to make the preparation courses available statewide. The evaluation criteria include evidence of addressing racial inequities, supporting candidates of color, providing cost-effective and accessible MTEL preparation, offering test preparation vouchers, the quality of course/preparation materials, examples of scholarships and financial support, clear eligibility requirements, a comprehensive budget, and evidence of impact on candidate pass rates.
The budget for this Departmental Master Agreement must be all-inclusive and include daily/hourly rates for each fiscal year. There is no information provided about set-asides, incumbents, funding requirements or sources, or contract renewal options.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFR - Required Specifications for Commodities and Services.docx | DOCX document | |
| DESE Required Language 9.3.2021.docx | DOCX document | |
| 23MACISCS3 - Attachment A - Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 23MACISCS3 - Bid - Final.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4906 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation) Updated June 17, 2021
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 1 |
| Demonstrated success in effectively preparing educator candidates for passing the MTEL |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 2 |
| The ability to make the preparation courses available to educators statewide. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 23MACISCS3 COMMBUYS Document #:
Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
| Multiplier |
| Maximum |
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| Bidder provides evidence of activities focused on addressing racial inequities, articulates how their organization has and is currently working on supporting anti-racist mindsets, internal practices, and services/offerings, and bidder shares specific examples of how their services/offerings are culturally responsive and anti-racist. |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 2 |
| Demonstrated success in effectively supporting candidates of color to pass the MTEL |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 3 |
| Cost-effective MTEL preparation such that the preparation is affordable for people with a variety of income levels. |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 4 |
| Ability to offer test preparation course vouchers should the Department elect to purchase them. |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| Course/preparation materials |
| (x5) |
| 25 |
| 6 |
| Examples of scholarships and/or financial support provided to candidates participating in the MTEL preparation |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| 7 |
| Clear description of eligibility requirements to participate in MTEL preparation |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 8 |
| Budget submitted is all inclusive and includes daily/hourly rates for each fiscal year of this Master Agreement |
| (x1) |
| 5 |
| 9 |
| Strong evidence of impact of MTEL preparation on candidate pass rates |
| (x5) |
| 25 |
| Total: |
Comments:
image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .