22SEPBH14 - Scorecard - Final.docx

DOCX document 73 KB Posted

Attached to
22SEPBH14 | SEPP copyediting & document design svc
Solicitation number
BD-22-1026-DOE02-DOE01-68241
Issued by
Massachusetts

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard from the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for a solicitation titled "22SEPBH14 | SEPP copyediting & document design svc". The solicitation is seeking a vendor to provide professional proofreading, copyediting, and document design services for DESE's professional development materials. The vendor must have a minimum of 5 years' experience, the ability to meet tight deadlines, provide edits for diverse audiences, and demonstrate expertise in technical document editing. The evaluation criteria include the vendor's educational background, experience applying a racial equity lens, detailed service descriptions, proofreading/editing process, key personnel resumes, client references, fee schedules, work samples, and an inventory of previously edited materials. The total available score is 100 points, with the contract term and any renewal options not specified.

The evaluation scorecard outlines the scoring rubric for each criterion, ranging from "Non-Responsive" (0 points) to "Outstanding" (5 points), with certain criteria weighted higher than others. Pricing information, set-asides, incumbent details, funding sources, and other financial terms are not provided in this document.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
22SEPBH14 - Measures - final.docx DOCX document
Required Language - 1.14.2021.docx DOCX document
22SEPBH14 - Attachment A - final.docx DOCX document
22SEPBH14 - Bid - Final.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4906 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation) Updated March 3, 2021

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
Minimum of 5 years’ experience providing copyediting and document design services
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
Proven ability to meet deadlines
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
Proven ability to provide line-item edits within very short timelines
Yes |_|
No |_|
4
Proven ability to provide edits for a variety of audiences
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 22SEPBH14 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-22-1026-DOE02-DOE01-68241 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Masters’ or higher degree in English, Writing, or a closely related field, Five to seven years’ experience with editing technical documents for educational audiences
(x2)
10
2
Demonstrates some evidence that they have examined and are working to improve their practices and supports (internal and/or external) from a racial equity lens, and bidder shares specific examples of how their services/offerings are culturally responsive and anti-racist
(x2)
10
3
A narrative of no more than 4 single-spaced pages describing the services vendor is available to provide. This narrative should also describe the vendor’s qualifications to provide those services
(x2)
25
4
Specific details on your process for proofreading and editing
(x2)
10
5
Resumes of no more than two pages for each of the key personnel proposed to support the work
(x2)
5
6
Reference Letters from three clients for whom similar work has been conducted
(x2)
10
7
Fee schedule(s) charged for copyediting and document design services and the basis for the fees, whether hourly, by the page or by the word and explain the conditions that would affect the range in rates.
(x2)
10
8
Inventory of materials you have edited and/or designed.
(x2)
10
9
Two editing samples and two design samples.
(x2)
10
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .