Attachment A. Past Performance Questionnaire - Amendment 0001.docx
DOCX document 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WCF Security O&M Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2031ZA24R00004
About this file
This document contains a solicitation for security equipment operation and maintenance services. The Bureau of Engraving and Printing is seeking these services for its Western Currency Facility in Fort Worth, Texas through a 100% small business set-aside. The anticipated period of performance is a base year plus four option periods from May 2024 to April 2029. Services include 24-hour preventative, corrective, and emergency maintenance for security cameras, card readers, locks, safes, alarms, x-ray machines, metal detectors, and related components. The solicitation also covers secondary services such as locksmithing, video monitoring, and duplication. A pre-proposal site visit will be held on March 18th and questions are due by March 22nd. Proposals must be submitted by April 1st, 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0003 - Solicitation Questions.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002 - Site Visit Sign-in Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment B. Wage Determination 2015-5231 revDec23.pdf | ||
| Attachment D. WCF Security O&M QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A. Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment C. Pricing Worksheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Technical Exhibit 4. 75W08004 Restricted Materials at WCF.pdf | ||
| Final RFP - 2031ZA24R00004 WCF Security OM 2.29.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
For Official Use Only/Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR SOLICITATION: 2031ZA24R00004 (WCF Security O&M Services)
To Offeror:
Please email this Past Performance Questionnaire to each of your references. Tailor this PPQ by saving the company name in the file's title. You must customize this block for each of your references:
<Comany Name> is competing for an award for the Department of Treasury, Bureau of Engraving & Printing (BEP) as a <prime / subcontractor> and asks that you fill out this questionnaire for the solicitation for WCF Security Equipment O&M Services.
| Offeror: |
| <Your Company Name> |
Reference Requirement Title:
Reference Prime Contractor:
Reference Contract #:
Reference Contract Type:
Reference's Name:
Reference's Agency/Company
Reference's Email:
Reference's Phone:
To Offeror’s Reference:
BEP requests your assistance in providing past performance information on the Contractor (a prospective “Offeror” under our Solicitation) and corresponding contract. Please complete this Questionnaire in accordance with the Instructions set forth immediately below. BEP agrees to protect your information as For Official Use Only/Source Selection Information consistent with FAR 2.101 and 3.104, as noted in the header on each page of this Questionnaire package.
Instructions for Offeror’s Reference:
1. Please complete the attached Past Performance Questionnaire regarding the Offeror based upon your most recent Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPARs) prepared in accordance with FAR 42.15.
2. Please use the following Rating Instruction (or the equivalent you use in producing your CPARs) in providing the rating assessments that best describe the contractor's performance on your contract.
3. Please email a copy of the completed Questionnaire directly to the BEP Contact no later than March 25, 2024 or as otherwise amended.
| BEP Contact: | Terry Lawrence | |
| Contact E-mail Address: | Terry.Lawrence@BEP.gov |
RATING INSTRUCTION
Please provide your assessment of each factor rated in the Questionnaire by using the following rating scale and corresponding definitions (or the equivalent you use in producing your Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs)), as may be appropriate in each case.
1. Rating Scale:
· Excellent - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit.
· Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.
· Fair - Performance meets contractual requirements.
· Poor - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.
· Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.
· Not Applicable (N/A) - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR SOLICITATION: 2031ZA24R00004 (WCF Security O&M Services)
-- TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR’S REFERENCE --
1. Your Name: ______________________________________________ Your Title: ______________________________________________ Your Role with this Contract: ________________________________________
2. Your Agency/Company Full Name: _____________________________________ Street Address: _______________________________________________ City, State, Zip: _______________________________________________
3. Contracting Office/Code: ___________________________________________
4. Period Assessed: __________________________________________________
5. Contract #: __________________________________________________
6. Name of Prime Contractor: ______________________________________________
| 7. Order #: | __________________________________________________ |
| 8. Location of Contractor Performance: | ____________________________________ |
| 9. Contacting Officer (Name/Phone): | ____________________________________ |
| 10. Contract Award Date/Effective Date: | ____________________________________ |
| 11. Contract Completion Date: | _________________________________________ |
| 12. Contract Awarded Dollar Value: | _________________________________________ |
| 13. Contract Current Dollar Value: | _________________________________________ |
14. Basis for Contract Award (check all that apply):
|_| Negotiated |_| Competitive |_| Non-Competitive
15. Type of Contract (check the one that applies):
| |_| Firm Fixed Price (FFP) | |_| Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) | ||
| |_| FFP (Level of Effort) | |_| CPFF (Level of Effort) | ||
| |_| Time and Material | |_| Labor Hour | |_| Other: | _______________________ |
16. Key Subcontractors (list as needed):
| Subcontractor Name: | _______________________________________________ | ||
| CAGE Code: | _______________________________________________ | ||
| DUNS + 4: | _______________________________________________ | ||
| Effort Performed: | _______________________________________________ | ||
| 17. Program Title & Acquisition Phase: | _______________________________________ | ||
| 18. Contract Effort Description: | _________________________________________ | ||
| · Does this contract include a subcontracting plan? | |_| Yes | |_| No | |_| N/A |
· Subcontracting under this contract is covered by a [comprehensive][commercial][N/A] (select one) small business subcontracting plan.
· Date of latest Subcontracting Report/Summary Subcontracting Report: ___________
FACTORS RATED:
1. Quality of Product or Service – Assess the contractor's conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional standards).
|_| Excellent |_| Good |_| Fair |_| Poor |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Timeliness (Schedule Performance) – Assess the contractor's timeliness against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance).
|_| Excellent |_| Good |_| Fair |_| Poor |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost, including reporting and analyzing variances.
Note: This factor is not rated for firm fixedprice, firm fixedprice with economic price adjustment, or firm fixedprice levelofeffort type contracts.
|_| Excellent |_| Good |_| Fair |_| Poor |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Business Relations – Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. Include the adequacy of the contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems and the contractor’s management of Property in Possession of Contractor (PIPC) also known as Government Furnished Property/Equipment (GFP/GFE). Address the timeliness of awards to subcontractors and management of subcontractors, including subcontractor costs.
|_| Excellent |_| Good |_| Fair |_| Poor |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5.
Problem Resolution (Management of Personnel) – Assess the completeness, timeliness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering changes proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions). The contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel. The contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
|_| Excellent |_| Good |_| Fair |_| Poor |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
OTHER AREAS ASSESSED:
1. Has the contractor been given cure notice(s), show cause notices(s), suspension of progress payments, or letters of direction, etc.?
|_| Yes |_| No |_| N/A Comments:__________________________________________________________________
2. Do you intend to exercise the option on this contract?
|_| Yes |_| No |_| N/A Comments:__________________________________________________________________
19. Recommendation: Given what you know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in the proposal, would you award to them today if you had a choice?
|_| Yes |_| No Comments:__________________________________________________________________
20. Please provide any additional comments concerning the past performance of the contractor.
Comments:__________________________________________________________________ For Official Use Only/Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .