Attachment_E_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SURFACE TENSIOMETERS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2031ZA17R00007
About this file
Attachment E - Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Responses_to_Request_for_Clarification_Amendment_0001__18_Jul._2017.pdf | ||
| Attachment_F_-_75D-07.0-04_EHS_Contractor_Requirements.pdf | ||
| Attachment_A_-_Statement_of_Work_-_Tensiometer__-_FINAL.pdf | ||
| Attachment_B_-_Non-Disclosure_Agreement_(NDA)_.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2031ZA17R00007.pdf | ||
| Attachment_C_-_WD_No._2015-4281.pdf | ||
| Attachment_D_-_WD_No._2015-5231.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP-2031ZA17R00007 Past Performance Questionnaire Template
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions:
· Sections I through III shall be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provide the questionnaire to three Assessors (personnel or organization who have at least five (5) years of production experience using the Intaglio currency press from supplier) The Assessor, in turn, shall verify information in Sections I through III and complete Sections V through VII. The Assessors shall provide the completed questionnaire to the contracting office point of contact no later than the date and time indicated below. The Offeror shall submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to Assessors.
· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the BEP to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: Milagros.Cortes@bep.gov no later than 12:00 PM EASTERN TIME, Thursday, 10 August 2017.
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
| Solicitation Number |
| Request for Proposal No. RFP-2031ZA17R00007 |
| Project/Requirement |
| SURFACE TENSIOMETERS Systems for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) Eastern Washington D.C. Facility (DCF) and Western Currency Facilities (WCF) in Fort Worth, TX. |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| |_| PRIME |
| |_| SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| |_| Convenience |
| |_| Default |
| |_| N/A |
III. Assessor information for Integrated Packaging System only
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Manager
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
V. Performance Evaluation
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unacceptable |
| N/A |
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
The referenced contractor was responsive to the customer’s needs.
The contractor’s personnel were qualified to meet the requirements.
SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE
The contractor’s ability to ensure, to the extent of its responsibility, that all tasks were completed within the requested time frame.
Time required for the vendor to install, startup, commission and train your staff on the equipment to begin full production.
Timeliness in Meeting Milestones and deliverables (if applicable)
MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE/PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
The contractor had a clear understanding of the tasks detailed in the Statement of Work
The contractor’s ability to complete tasks correctly the first time.
The contractor’s ability to resolve problems.
Did the contractor successfully manage its subcontractors?
Was the contractor’s management effective in controlling cost, schedule and performance requirements?
QUALITY
What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance? Were your specifications and expectations met by the contractor?
Quality of the finished product; please note any specific issues.
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
COST
The contractor’s ability to accurately estimate cost.
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission
General Comments:
| _________________________________ | ____________________ | |
| Assessor’s Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .