2024_Open House Summary Rankings.pdf
PDF 95 KB Posted
- Attached to
- feasibility Study bids
- Solicitation number
- S-P00400-00011401
- Issued by
- Multnomah County, Gladstone City, Oregon
About this file
This is a feasibility study request for proposal issued by Mt. Hood Community College (MHCC) for its Gresham campus. MHCC seeks an experienced contractor to conduct a comprehensive feasibility review of modular classrooms and a playground facility located near the Head Start building in Parking Lot "P" to determine the feasibility and budget requirements for replacement and expansion of these structures. The scope of work includes reviewing existing facilities, assessing applicable land use and building code requirements, meeting with the project team, developing a concept site plan and space plan, and preparing schematic design documents with all necessary application materials. Proposals must be submitted by September 6, 2024, at 2:30 pm, with a proposed contract term spanning September 1, 2024, through October 1, 2024. The one-month contract period indicates this is a focused, targeted feasibility study designed to inform future development decisions.
Proposers must submit a lump sum fee for services, with cost serving as a significant evaluation factor alongside company experience and references in the best value selection process. Company qualifications documentation is limited to a maximum of 10 pages and must be submitted using MHCC's specified attachment forms; proposals submitted on non-compliant forms will be summarily rejected. The RFP does not identify specific set-aside designations for disadvantaged enterprises, nor are incumbent vendors referenced. No explicit budget range is provided in the solicitation, though the scope of work addressing comprehensive facility review and design documents suggests meaningful financial implications. MHCC reserves the right to determine the most responsible proposer and retains discretion in contractor selection.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| feasibility Study Bids.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sports Options w/ dots Ranking > 3.75 = priority
Preferred Number of
Courts/Field s
Current Use within the Park
Score Yes=1 No=0
Discussed at Open House
Score Yes=1 No=0
Number of Dots allocated at Open
Score 1- 15=0.5
15-26=1
Identified a community gap
Score Yes=1
Online survey *top ranked/combined
Score Total # of votes/ highest vote
Online survey -write in, what was missing (5 or more votes)
Score Total # of votes/ highest vote
SPRD
programming need
Score X=1
Cost to build Score $=1
$$=0.5
Potential funding available (grants, donations)
Score Yes=1 Maybe =0.5
Sustainable within current tax structure
Score Yes=1
Likely =0.5
Rental Opportunity
Score Yes=1
Notes
Baseball Field (Little League) 4.24 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 4 0.5 26 0.2 $$ 0.5 Yes 1 Grass infield, removeable bases. Can work with multi-use field. Dug outs in bad shape. $$ to fix. ; rental opportunity
Basketball Court (s) 5.69 2 or 3 Yes 1 Yes 1 8 0.5 Yes 1 20 0.2 $$ 0.5 Maybe 0.5 Yes 1 OBC has said something to SPRD about the potential of funding. Nothing formal.
Community Garden 3.56 No Yes 1 Yes 1 60 0.6 $$ 0.5 Unknown Likely 0.5 Shared fence with pickleball/ basketball; 25,000 square feet; dedicated space. Use limited to community garden people only.
Dog Park 3.37 No Yes 1 4 0.5 Yes 1 1 10 0.4 $$ 0.5 City of Sisters- East Portal - city council hearing proposal in the next few months.
Football field Flag (30 x 70 yds.) 4.51 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 55* 0.5 $ 1 Yes 1 *Captured as youth athletic fields in survey; open space could be used for events; rental opportunity
Football field Tackle (36 x 80 yds.) 4.51 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 55* 0.5 $ 1 Yes 1 *Captured as youth athletic fields in survey; open space could be used for events; rental opportunity
Multiuse Courts 5.48 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 8 0.5 52 0.5 $$ 0.5 Yes 1 Yes 1 Reduces footprint; both pickleball and basketball people have expressed concerns
Pickleball Courts (34' x 60') 7.50 8 Yes 1 Yes 1 26 1 108 1.0 $$ 0.5 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Rental opportunity; tournament opportunity
Playground Pre-K 5.00 No Yes 1 8 0.5 X 1 $$ 0.5 Yes 1 Yes 1
Playground 5-12yrs 5.36 Yes 1 Yes 1 5 0.5 39 0.4 $$ 0.5 Yes 1 Yes 1
Rock Climbing Gym Wall 1.50 No Yes 1 1 $$ 0.5
Scenic & Natural Area Viewpoints 1.00 No No Yes 1
Soccer field ( 20x30 yds.) 6.01 4 Yes 1 Yes 1 5 0.5 55* 0.5 X 1 $ 1 Yes 1 *Captured as youth athletic fields on survey; open space could be used for events; rental opportunity
Soccer field ( 40x60 yds.) 6.01 2 Yes 1 Yes 1 5 0.5 55* 0.5 X 1 $ 1 Yes 1 *Captured as youth athletic fields on survey; open space could be used for events; rental opportunity
Softball Field (Adult Coed) 2.50 No Yes 1 2 0.5 $ 1
Swimming Pool 3.00 No Yes 1 Yes 1 3 0 27 1 $$$ No Not permitted within lease agreement.
Tennis Courts 1.50 Yes 1 No $$ 0.5
*Online survey combined with emails
SPRD Conceptual Park Design - Feedback Results
Sheet1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .