TACCOM_II_TC1_PROPOSAL_WORKBOOK.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 611 KB Posted

Attached to
TACCOM II Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
2017036109
Issued by
Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection

About this file

This document is a request for proposals (RFP) for the Tactical Communications II (TacCom II) requirement. The RFP seeks proposals for products and services across five technical categories, including equipment, operations and maintenance, engineering, and general items. Offerors must submit separate proposals for each technical category, with pricing templates required for equipment submissions. Proposal responses are due by March 16, 2018 and should be emailed to the designated address. The RFP will result in multiple awards made against the Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contracts. Eligible vendors include small businesses. The work will support Customs and Border Protection and involve incumbent contractors.

A0009 TC1 Workbook

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to TACCOM II, newest first.
File Type Posted
TACCOM_II_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM.docx DOCX document
WD_No._2015-5637_SCA_WD_for_San_Francisco_Revision_8_011618.pdf PDF
CO-COR_Certification_Form_-_Federal.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_RFP_A0010_Final.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_TC2_Proposal_Workbook_A0010.Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_TC1_PROPOSAL_WORKBOOK_A0010.Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
INDIVIDUAL_SMALL_BUSINESS_SUBCONTRACTING_PLAN_TEMPLATE.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_SERVICES_PRICING_TEMPLATE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CO-COR_Certification_Form_-_State_or_Local.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_FBO_COVER_LETTER_A0009.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_TC2_PROPOSAL_WORKBOOK.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
WD_No._2015-5637_SCA_WD_for_San_Francisco_Revision_8_011618.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_RFP_A0008.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_SF30_A0006.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_RFP_A0006.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_SUBCATEGORY_EQUIPMENT_PRICING_TEMPLATE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP_TACCOM_II_QUESTIONS_ANSWERS_A0005.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_SF30_A0004.pdf PDF
RFP_TACCOM_II_QUESTIONS_ANSWERS_A0003.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_LABOR_CATEGORIES.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_SF30_A0003.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_COVER_LETTER_A0003.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_RFP_A0003.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_SF30_A0001.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_RELEVANT_EXPERIENCE_FORM.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_SF30_A0002.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_LCAT_MAP_TEMPLATE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_RFP_A0002.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_LCAT_MAP_TEMPLATE_v2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_RFP_A0001.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_RELEVANT_EXPERIENCE_FORM.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_RFP.pdf PDF
TACCOM_II_LCAT_MAP_TEMPLATE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_LABOR_CATEGORIES.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM.DOCX DOCX document
TACCOM_II_DISCOUNT_AND_SERVICES_PRICING.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_LABOR_CATEGORIES.XLSX XLSX spreadsheet
SECOND_DRAFT_RFP_TACCOM_II_QUESTIONS_COMMENTS_TEMPLATE_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_Survey.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_REGISTRATION_LIST_-_FBO_NOTICE.xls XLS spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_PRE-SOLICITATION_CONFERENCE_FBO_NOTICE.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_RELEVANT_EXPERIENCE_FORM.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_QUESTIONS_COMMENTS_TEMPLATE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_SECTION_B.docx DOCX document
TACCOM_II_SELF_SCORING_WORKSHEET.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TACCOM_II_REQUIREMENTS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 50

TACCOM II has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TC1 - Cover Page

TacCom II Technical Category 1 Workbook
Workbook Cover Page
Instructions for completing this workbook:
Submission of this workbook is a requirement of the TacCom II proposal. Offeror input is required in cells with yellow fill.

Do not enter data in columns marked, "For Government Use Only."

Offerors should not modify the template format. Do not remove cells, do not add rows or columns.

Use one workbook per Technical Category submission.

Offeror:
Technical Category:
Subcategory:
INDEX
TABDescriptionRFP CriteriaEvaluation
TAB F1General Compliance ChecklistFACTOR 1: Responsiveness to SolicitationAcceptability Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
TAB F3 - RESERVEDRESERVED for Subcategory Equipment Checklist and Sample Order (Unpriced)FACTOR 3: Technical AcceptabilityAcceptability Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
TAB F5(A), (B) and (C)Relevant Experience Qualifications Checklist (Formerly Relevant Experience Form)FACTOR 5: Relevant Past Experience/PerformanceAcceptability Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
TAB F6Self-Score SpreadsheetFACTOR 6: Weighted Past Experience/Past PerformanceWeighted Evaluation
TAB F6 InstructionsSelf-Score Spreadsheet Instructions
TAB F7Price Volume ChecklistFACTOR 7: PriceAcceptability Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
Note, the following clarifications are provided.

- TAB F1: Compliance requirements are not limited to those provided in Tab F1. Offerors are advised to adhere to all instructions of this solicitation.

- Refer to the TACCOM II Individual Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template to deliver proposals responsive to Factor 2, Individual Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

- TAB F3: No data should be entered in Tab F3. Refer to the Equipment Subcategory Template for meeting the requirements of Factor 3, Technical Acceptability

- Tab F5(A), (B) and(C): The Offeror's checklist responses and data submitted in this tab will be used to determine whether a Relevant Experience project complies with the instructions and qualification criteria expressed in the RFP, and whether the project meets the relevance criteria of Factor 5. Any documentation submitted in response to the RFP may be assessed by the Government to validate reference project qualification and relevance.

- No data should be entered in Tab F6 Instructions

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY:

F1 - General Compliance TC1

General Compliance Checklist
RFP Citations: Section L.5, L.6, L.7.1, L.7.2
Instructions for Completing this Tab: Offeror Input is required for each dropdown in column E. Offerors should confirm within this checklist that all Submission Requirements are met through its proposal submission.
ItemRFP CitationCompliance CriteriaProposal Naming ConventionOfferor SubmissionFOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY
Confirm all requirements are metCompliance Evaluation (Compliant/Not Compliant)Non-Compliance Explanation and Citation
General Submission Requirements
1L.5.5Proposal has been submitted by 4:30 PM, March 16, 2018 in electronic format only. Send to email address: TACCOMII@cbp.dhs.gov (Two (2) Capital i's)
2L.5.1Only one proposal is submitted for this Technical Category
3L.5.1Proposal submitted in response to the Technical Category is individual and independently responsive to the RFP (two separate complete proposals required for each TC)
4L.6The Company Name and RFP number is identified in the Subject Line of the proposal submission email(s), formatted as follows: "Offeror Name" TACCOM II Proposal_TC1_Email X of X_RFP 2017036109 or "Offeror Name" TACCOM II Proposal_TC2_Email X of X_RFP 2017036109
Volume I
5L.7.1.1Cover letter submitted in PDF formatCompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

6 L.7.1.1 a. Cover Letter identifies all enclosures CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

7 L.7.1.1 b. Cover Letter indicates the Technical Category CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

8 L.7.1.1 c. Cover Letter identifies Subcategory/ies under which Offeror is submitting its proposal CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

9 L.7.1.1 d. Responses to Solicitation Provisions provided in Section I to include HSAR 3052.209-70 and HSAR 3052.209-72. (Mandatory) CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

10 L.7.1.1 e. Cover Letter provides certification of Small Business Size Standard, if applicable CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

11 L.7.1.1 f. Cover letter specifies the proposal acceptance period (min 120 calendar days from submission) CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

12 L.7.1.1 g. First or title page shall also be in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, paragraph (c)(2): CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

13 L.7.1.1 (i) Includes the solicitation number; CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

14 L.7.1.1 (ii) The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror (and electronic address if available); CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

15 L.7.1.1 (iii) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item; CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

16 L.7.1.1 (iv) Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation (expressly stated); and CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

17 L.7.1.1 (v) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal (expressly stated). Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office. CompanyName.VOL1.CoverLetter.TC1.pdf

18 L.7.1.2 Provide executed (Signed) SF-1449 submitted in PDF format, including Offeror DUNS and CAGE, CompanyName.VOL1.SF1449.pdf CompanyName.VOL1.SF30-(amendment #, A0001, A0002, A0003, A0004, A0005, A0006, A0007, A0008, and A0009).pdf 19 L7.1.2 Offeror's Legal Name and Address in Block 17a on the SF1449 must match the information in SAM.GOV including the CAGE Code and DUNS Number CompanyName.VOL1.SF1449.pdf CompanyName.VOL1.SF30-(amendment #, A0001, A0002, A0003, A0004, A0005, A0006, A0007, A0008, and A0009).pdf 20 L.7.1.2 Provide executed (Signed) SF-30s submitted in PDF format, for A0001, A0002, A0003, A0004, A0005, A0006, A0007, A0008, and A0009. CompanyName.VOL1.SF1449.pdf CompanyName.VOL1.SF30-(amendment #, A0001, A0002, A0003, A0004, A0005, A0006, A0007, A0008, and A0009).pdf 21 L.7.1.2 The Name, Title, Signature and Date identified in Block 30b must be an authorized representative with authority to commit the Offeror to contractual obligations. CompanyName.VOL1.SF1449.pdf CompanyName.VOL1.SF30-(amendment #, A0001, A0002, A0003, A0004, A0005, A0006, A0007, A0008, and A0009).pdf 22 L.7.1.3 Individual Small Business Subcontracting Plan submitted in PDF format (one plan for each Technical Category). A small business concern as defined in FAR 52.219-28 is not required to submit an Individual Subcontracting Plan.

CompanyName.VOL1.ISB.TC1.pdf

23L.7.1.4Section K Representations and Certifications submitted in PDF format (a confirmed response is required for either item (a) or (b) below)CompanyName.VOL1.RC.pdf
24L.7.1.4(a) FAR 52.212-3. If the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Website, and paragraph (b) of this provision is submitted within its Volume 1, Representations and Certifications submission. (NA if item (b) of this criteria is confirmed)CompanyName.VOL1.RC.pdf
25L.7.1.4(b) FAR 52.212-3. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, paragraphs (c) through (u) of this provision are submitted within its Volume 1, Representations and Certifications submission. (NA if item (a) of this criteria is confirmed)CompanyName.VOL1.RC.pdf
26L.7.1.4(c) FAR 52.209-7. Offeror provided a response to this provision in section K. (Mandatory) within its Volume 1, Representations and Certifications submission.CompanyName.VOL1.RC.pdf
Volume II
27L.6.1A completed TacCom II Proposal Workbook is submittedCompanyName.Workbook.TC1.xls
28L.7.2.1Relevant Experience Reference Project Attachments submitted in PDF format; maximum of three (3) submissions. Ensure attachments are in the order described in L.7.2.3CompanyName.VOL2.TC1.RelExpA.pdf, CompanyName.VOL2. TC1.RelExpB.pdf, and CompanyName.VOL2. TC1.RelExpC.pdf
29L.7.2.4Self-Scoring Worksheet, Tab F6 Self-Score, of the TacCom II Proposal Workbook is submitted in PDF format.

CompanyName.VOL2.TC1.ScoringWorksheet.pdf

F3 - Tech Acceptability

Factor 3: Technical Acceptability
RFP Citations: Sections L.7.3.2 and M.7

RESERVED

F5(A) RE Qualification

Factor 5: Relevant Past Experience/Past Performance
RFP Citations: Sections L.7.2.2, L.7.2.3 and M.4

Relevant Experience Qualification Checklist

Instructions for completing this checklist
Offeror Input is required in cells with yellow fill. Under the column titled Offeror Confirmation, offerors must make the appropriate selection from the dropdown list in response to the narrative in the column titled Offeror Instructions and Evaluation Standards. Offerors are asked to provide a confirmation that certain documentation is submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project. In cases where submitted documentation does not conform to the documentation requirements, offerors may select "Missing or Inconsistent Data Addressed by the CO" from the drop down and clarify these discrepancies by completing one of the two RFP Forms titled "CO/COR Certification - Federal" or "CO/COR Certification - State or Local."* The forms contain additional instructions. If you are submitting relevant experience project data from a State or Local government use the form titled "CO/COR Certification - State or Local". If you are submitting relevant experience project data from the Federal government use the form titled "CO/COR Certification - Federal"
FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY
Award ID: In the yellow fill space below enter the award ID award number(s). For a “collection of orders,” list all award IDs in order of highest to lowest based on obligated amount.Assessment (Verified/Not Verified)Rationale (Findings, proposal citations)Action TakenSelf-Score Impact Assessment

Reference IDV: In the yellow fill space below, enter Reference IDV (if award was against an IDIQ/BPA).

Obligated Amount: In the yellow space below, enter the Obligated Amount of the Relevant Experience contract supporting this Relevant Experience Project. If it is a collection of orders enter the sum of the obligated amount for all orders.

Contracting Agencies: In the yellow space below, enter Contracting Agency(ies) (or State/Local Government entity) for which work was performed.

Agency Point of Contact: In the yellow fill space below enter the name and email address of the cognizant Contracting Officer (or equivalent position for State/Local). If the Relevant Experience Project is a collection of orders enter the name and email of the cognizant Contracting Officer who signed the order with the largest funded dollar value.

ItemEvaluation Standards and InstructionsOfferor Confirmation
1Confirm Award ID is submitted only once across all Reference Projects.

If Award ID is submitted more than once, the data from the first appearance by Relevant Experience Project Number will be used. Subsequent data will not be considered and all points supported by subsequent data will be deducted from the offerors self-score. This standard applies across both TacCom II technical categories.

2 If submitting a collection of orders as a project, confirm all orders among a "collection of orders" are sourced from the same Reference IDV.

Orders that are added to the Relevant Experience Project that do not reference the same IDV will have all associated data removed from consideration.

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

3 Qualifying Award Type

Enter Qualifying award type from one of the following: (1) a single contract; (2) a single task or delivery order awarded under a Multiple Award contract (as defined below); (3) a single task or delivery order awarded under a master Single Award Indefinite Delivery Delivery/Task Order contract (Definite Quantity, Requirements, or Indefinite Quantity) contract (FAR 16.5); (4) a single delivery/task order placed under a Federal Supply Schedule contract (FAR 8.405-2); (5) a single task or delivery order placed under a master Multiple Award Blanket Purchase Agreement, or (6) a single task or delivery order placed under a master Single Award Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA)(FAR 8.405-3); or (7) a collection of orders.

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

4 Confirm the fully executed (Contracting Officer signed) award document (SF 1449, or equivalent and modifications) is attached. For a collection of orders, each order must be fully executed. RFP L.7.2.3.1

Any contract document that is not fully executed may be removed from consideration and all points supported by that document and other corresponding data will be deducted from the offerors self-score. Offerors may address an unsigned contract or order via the CO certification process according to the instructions in this checklist as well as the direction described in L.7.2.2.

5 Confirm the Contracting Agency is a federal agency, state government, or locality in the United States. (OCONUS for federal agency submission is acceptable if work was in a foreign nation but on a US government base/installation)

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project that is not from a Federal, State or Local Government entity will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

6 Confirm that the total obligated amount is greater than $150K. For a collection of orders, the cumulative obligated amount for the collection of orders must be greater than $150K.

Federal award documents should contain a government funding/appropriation number associated with a dollar amount on the signed contract document. If there are multiple mods then the obligated amount should be the cumulative of those mods. Where a fully executed award document does not contain a funding/appropriation number, offeror may clarify the missing data by following the instructions at the top of this checklist.

7 Confirm obligated amount matches the amount shown on the Fully Executed Award Document and Federal Procurement Data System – Next Generation (FPDS-NG) (for federal awards) attachments. For FPDS refer to the "Action Obligation" field.

In the event the values do not match offeror must procure the signature of the CO in accordance with the instructions at the top of this checklist. This item is exempt for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

8 Confirm that for Relevant Experience projects performed for a federal agency, the final FPDS-NG Record (printed directly from FPDS-NG) is attached.

The FPDS must be the full printout from FPDS that shows the competition block. Providing a synopsis of FPDS using the FPDS EZ search is not acceptable. This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

9 For orders against a MA/IDIQ in accordance with FAR 16.505 (b)(1) Fair Opportunity, provide additional confirmation that FPDS substantiates associated points in Self-Scoring Worksheet. Note, if a project is a “collection of orders” placed under a Single-Award or Multiple-Award IDIQ contract or BPA, the predominant proportion of work must have been competed under FAR 16.505 to earn points applicable to this Item.

To claim points for Section 1, Item 7, of the Self-Score Worksheet, the Data Element titled "Fair Opportunity/Limited Sources" in the competition block of the corresponding FPDS record must say either "Fair Opportunity Given", "Follow-On Action Following Competitive Initial Action", or "Competitive Set Aside".

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

10 Confirm that the completion (the end date of the base and any exercised option periods) of the submitted reference project contract or order is later than June 30, 2014. If this Relevant Experience Project is being supported by a collection of delivery/task orders, the order with the highest obligated dollar value must have a completion date after June 30, 2014.

Data associated with reference project contracts or orders whose completion date is prior to June 30, 2014 will not be considered and all associated points will be deducted. The government may rely on the FPDS record to confirm this data. In the event the contract documents conflict with the FPDS record, offerors may follow the instructions at the top of this checklist. If the completion date is not clear on the contract document for state or local contracts, the offeror may follow the instructions at the top of this checklist.

11 Confirm the requirements on the documentation submitted as part of a Relevant Experience Project match the selected Sub-Category.

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project whose requirements do not match the selected sub-category will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

12 Confirm the majority (>51% (based on obligated dollar amount)) of the project requirement aligns to the scope of the subcategory selected. For TC1, ancillary services may contribute to the >51% requirement, provided that the services directly support the delivery of applicable subcategory products under the same order/contract, and the primary purpose of the relevant experience project is for the delivery of supply items relevant to the subcategory. For TC2, the majority (>51%) of the relevant experience project must be for services in the given subcategory.

Where a contract/order is submitted for a relevant experience project and the funded value of the requirements that align to the scope of the sub-category are below 51% of the total value of that contract, that contract/order will not be considered and all points supported by that documentation will be disqualified.

13 Confirm the Statement of Work (or equivalent) AND the Section B Schedule of Supplies and Services is attached.** For a collection of orders include, the SOW and Section B for each order. RFP L.7.2.3.2

14Confirm that yellow highlights in attached SOW clearly indicate requirements match the sub-category.
15Confirm that specific subcategory areas of delivery are manually/electronically labelled in attached SOW and easily identified? (Note: Each sub-category must be clearly labelled and easily identified in order to claim credit on TacCom II Scoring Spreadsheet)
16Confirm the Place(s) of Performance (Delivery/Service Locations) are clearly stated in the SOW/SOO/PWS and are highlighted in Pink?
17Confirm that the most recent "Final" Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) (printed directly from PPIRS) is attached. When a CPARS record exists but is not in “completed” status, submission of the “pending” or draft report is acceptable. When no qualifying CPARS exists, Confirm the Past Performance Rating Form is submitted, and signed by the cognizant CO or COR.

The last date of the period of performance being evaluated must be later than June 30, 2014 and at least 50% of the rated criteria must be rated satisfactory or higher.

If a Past Performance Rating form is submitted and it is not signed by the appropriate rating official either the cognizant CO or COR, it is not valid . If a Past Performance Rating form is submitted and it references multiple orders or contracts, it is not valid (see RFP Section L.7.2.3.4). In all these case points claimed for past performance will be deducted from offeror's self score.

18 Confirm that the Contractor (as indicated on the Award Form) was the prime contractor on the award?

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project where the offeror was not the prime contractor will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

19 Confirm the Contractor Name and DUNS on all the above documents match (or qualifying exception below).

Any contract documentation that does not comply with the following RFP requirement will result in disqualification of that contract documentation from consideration.

Per RFP section L.5.3 - "For any claimed evaluation element identifying a different name other than that of the Offeror, due to a merger, acquisition, novation, or change-of-name agreement, the offeror has the burden to establish that the claimed evaluation element should be attributed to the Offeror. To do so, the offeror must provide evidence of the merger, acquisition, novation, or change-of- name agreement, as well as a justification demonstrating how the evaluation element being claimed is applicable to the Offeror." Reference RFP L.7.2.2 and L.7.2.3.6-8.

19.aNovation: Confirm whether a novation exception applies AND novation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
19.bJV under the SBA’s ASMPP: Confirm whether a JV exception applies AND supporting documentation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
19.cMeaningful Relationship: Confirm whether a meaningful relationship exception applies AND supporting documentation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
*If any Offeror response is ""Missing or Inconsistent Data Addressed by the CO" submit the applicable CO-COR Certification Form (Federal/State or Local) among Relevant Experience Attachments.
**Offerors may submit a Relevance Narrative in support of the Relevant Experience requirements documents.All applicable fields addressed/verified (Yes/No):
Rating (Qualifies/Does Not Qualify/Partially Qualifies):
PROJECT RELEVANCE SUMMARY
Project is relevant to the Technical Sub-CategoryRating Pass/Fail:

F5(B)

Factor 5: Relevant Past Experience/Past Performance
RFP Citations: Sections L.7.2.2, L.7.2.3 and M.4

Relevant Experience Qualification Checklist

Instructions for completing this checklist
Offeror Input is required in cells with yellow fill. Under the column titled Offeror Confirmation, offerors must make the appropriate selection from the dropdown list in response to the narrative in the column titled Offeror Instructions and Evaluation Standards. Offerors are asked to provide a confirmation that certain documentation is submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project. In cases where submitted documentation does not conform to the documentation requirements, offerors may select "Missing or Inconsistent Data Addressed by the CO" from the drop down and clarify these discrepancies by completing one of the two RFP Forms titled "CO/COR Certification - Federal" or "CO/COR Certification - State or Local."* The forms contain additional instructions. If you are submitting relevant experience project data from a State or Local government use the form titled "CO/COR Certification - State or Local". If you are submitting relevant experience project data from the Federal government use the form titled "CO/COR Certification - Federal"
FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY
Award ID: In the yellow fill space below enter the award ID award number(s). For a “collection of orders,” list all award IDs in order of highest to lowest based on obligated amount.Assessment (Verified/Not Verified)Rationale (Findings, proposal citations)Action TakenSelf-Score Impact Assessment

Reference IDV: In the yellow fill space below, enter Reference IDV (if award was against an IDIQ/BPA).

Obligated Amount: In the yellow space below, enter the Obligated Amount of the Relevant Experience contract supporting this Relevant Experience Project. If it is a collection of orders enter the sum of the obligated amount for all orders.

Contracting Agencies: In the yellow space below, enter Contracting Agency(ies) (or State/Local Government entity) for which work was performed.

Agency Point of Contact: In the yellow fill space below enter the name and email address of the cognizant Contracting Officer (or equivalent position for State/Local). If the Relevant Experience Project is a collection of orders enter the name and email of the cognizant Contracting Officer who signed the order with the largest funded dollar value.

ItemEvaluation Standards and InstructionsOfferor Confirmation
1Confirm Award ID is submitted only once across all Reference Projects.

If Award ID is submitted more than once, the data from the first appearance by Relevant Experience Project Number will be used. Subsequent data will not be considered and all points supported by subsequent data will be deducted from the offerors self-score. This standard applies across both TacCom II technical categories.

2 If submitting a collection of orders as a project, confirm all orders among a "collection of orders" are sourced from the same Reference IDV.

Orders that are added to the Relevant Experience Project that do not reference the same IDV will have all associated data removed from consideration.

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

3 Qualifying Award Type

Enter Qualifying award type from one of the following: (1) a single contract; (2) a single task or delivery order awarded under a Multiple Award contract (as defined below); (3) a single task or delivery order awarded under a master Single Award Indefinite Delivery Delivery/Task Order contract (Definite Quantity, Requirements, or Indefinite Quantity) contract (FAR 16.5); (4) a single delivery/task order placed under a Federal Supply Schedule contract (FAR 8.405-2); (5) a single task or delivery order placed under a master Multiple Award Blanket Purchase Agreement, or (6) a single task or delivery order placed under a master Single Award Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA)(FAR 8.405-3); or (7) a collection of orders.

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

4 Confirm the fully executed (Contracting Officer signed) award document (SF 1449, or equivalent and modifications) is attached. For a collection of orders, each order must be fully executed. RFP L.7.2.3.1

Any contract document that is not fully executed may be removed from consideration and all points supported by that document and other corresponding data will be deducted from the offerors self-score. Offerors may address an unsigned contract or order via the CO certification process according to the instructions in this checklist as well as the direction described in L.7.2.2.

5 Confirm the Contracting Agency is a federal agency, state government, or locality in the United States. (OCONUS for federal agency submission is acceptable if work was in a foreign nation but on a US government base/installation)

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project that is not from a Federal, State or Local Government entity will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

6 Confirm that the total obligated amount is greater than $150K. For a collection of orders, the cumulative obligated amount for the collection of orders must be greater than $150K.

Federal award documents should contain a government funding/appropriation number associated with a dollar amount on the signed contract document. If there are multiple mods then the obligated amount should be the cumulative of those mods. Where a fully executed award document does not contain a funding/appropriation number, offeror may clarify the missing data by following the instructions at the top of this checklist.

7 Confirm obligated amount matches the amount shown on the Fully Executed Award Document and Federal Procurement Data System – Next Generation (FPDS-NG) (for federal awards) attachments. For FPDS refer to the "Action Obligation" field.

In the event the values do not match offeror must procure the signature of the CO in accordance with the instructions at the top of this checklist. This item is exempt for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

8 Confirm that for Relevant Experience projects performed for a federal agency, the final FPDS-NG Record (printed directly from FPDS-NG) is attached.

The FPDS must be the full printout from FPDS that shows the competition block. Providing a synopsis of FPDS using the FPDS EZ search is not acceptable. This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

9 For orders against a MA/IDIQ in accordance with FAR 16.505 (b)(1) Fair Opportunity, provide additional confirmation that FPDS substantiates associated points in Self-Scoring Worksheet. Note, if a project is a “collection of orders” placed under a Single-Award or Multiple-Award IDIQ contract or BPA, the predominant proportion of work must have been competed under FAR 16.505 to earn points applicable to this Item.

To claim points for Section 1, Item 7, of the Self-Score Worksheet, the Data Element titled "Fair Opportunity/Limited Sources" in the competition block of the corresponding FPDS record must say either "Fair Opportunity Given", "Follow-On Action Following Competitive Initial Action", or "Competitive Set Aside".

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

10 Confirm that the completion (the end date of the base and any exercised option periods) of the submitted reference project contract or order is later than June 30, 2014. If this Relevant Experience Project is being supported by a collection of delivery/task orders, the order with the highest obligated dollar value must have a completion date after June 30, 2014.

Data associated with reference project contracts or orders whose completion date is prior to June 30, 2014 will not be considered and all associated points will be deducted. The government may rely on the FPDS record to confirm this data. In the event the contract documents conflict with the FPDS record, offerors may follow the instructions at the top of this checklist. If the completion date is not clear on the contract document for state or local contracts, the offeror may follow the instructions at the top of this checklist.

11 Confirm the requirements on the documentation submitted as part of a Relevant Experience Project match the selected Sub-Category.

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project whose requirements do not match the selected sub-category will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

12 Confirm the majority (>51% (based on obligated dollar amount)) of the project requirement aligns to the scope of the subcategory selected. For TC1, ancillary services may contribute to the >51% requirement, provided that the services directly support the delivery of applicable subcategory products under the same order/contract, and the primary purpose of the relevant experience project is for the delivery of supply items relevant to the subcategory. For TC2, the majority (>51%) of the relevant experience project must be for services in the given subcategory.

Where a contract/order is submitted for a relevant experience project and the funded value of the requirements that align to the scope of the sub-category are below 51% of the total value of that contract, that contract/order will not be considered and all points supported by that documentation will be disqualified.

13 Confirm the Statement of Work (or equivalent) AND the Section B Schedule of Supplies and Services is attached.** For a collection of orders include, the SOW and Section B for each order. RFP L.7.2.3.2

14Confirm that yellow highlights in attached SOW clearly indicate requirements match the sub-category.
15Confirm that specific subcategory areas of delivery are manually/electronically labelled in attached SOW and easily identified? (Note: Each sub-category must be clearly labelled and easily identified in order to claim credit on TacCom II Scoring Spreadsheet)
16Confirm the Place(s) of Performance (Delivery/Service Locations) are clearly stated in the SOW/SOO/PWS and are highlighted in Pink?
17Confirm that the most recent "Final" Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) (printed directly from PPIRS) is attached. When a CPARS record exists but is not in “completed” status, submission of the “pending” or draft report is acceptable. When no qualifying CPARS exists, Confirm the Past Performance Rating Form is submitted, and signed by the cognizant CO or COR.

The last date of the period of performance being evaluated must be later than June 30, 2014 and at least 50% of the rated criteria must be rated satisfactory or higher.

If a Past Performance Rating form is submitted and it is not signed by the appropriate rating official either the cognizant CO or COR, it is not valid . If a Past Performance Rating form is submitted and it references multiple orders or contracts, it is not valid (see RFP Section L.7.2.3.4). In all these case points claimed for past performance will be deducted from offeror's self score.

18 Confirm that the Contractor (as indicated on the Award Form) was the prime contractor on the award?

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project where the offeror was not the prime contractor will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

19 Confirm the Contractor Name and DUNS on all the above documents match (or qualifying exception below).

Any contract documentation that does not comply with the following RFP requirement will result in disqualification of that contract documentation from consideration.

Per RFP section L.5.3 - "For any claimed evaluation element identifying a different name other than that of the Offeror, due to a merger, acquisition, novation, or change-of-name agreement, the offeror has the burden to establish that the claimed evaluation element should be attributed to the Offeror. To do so, the offeror must provide evidence of the merger, acquisition, novation, or change-of- name agreement, as well as a justification demonstrating how the evaluation element being claimed is applicable to the Offeror." Reference RFP L.7.2.2 and L.7.2.3.6-8.

19.aNovation: Confirm whether a novation exception applies AND novation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
19.bJV under the SBA’s ASMPP: Confirm whether a JV exception applies AND supporting documentation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
19.cMeaningful Relationship: Confirm whether a meaningful relationship exception applies AND supporting documentation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
*If any Offeror response is ""Missing or Inconsistent Data Addressed by the CO" submit the applicable CO-COR Certification Form (Federal/State or Local) among Relevant Experience Attachments.
**Offerors may submit a Relevance Narrative in support of the Relevant Experience requirements documents.All applicable fields addressed/verified (Yes/No):
Rating (Qualifies/Does Not Qualify/Partially Qualifies):
PROJECT RELEVANCE SUMMARY
Project is relevant to the Technical Sub-CategoryRating Pass/Fail:

F5(C)

Factor 5: Relevant Past Experience/Past Performance
RFP Citations: Sections L.7.2.2, L.7.2.3 and M.4

Relevant Experience Qualification Checklist

Instructions for completing this checklist
Offeror Input is required in cells with yellow fill. Under the column titled Offeror Confirmation, offerors must make the appropriate selection from the dropdown list in response to the narrative in the column titled Offeror Instructions and Evaluation Standards. Offerors are asked to provide a confirmation that certain documentation is submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project. In cases where submitted documentation does not conform to the documentation requirements, offerors may select "Missing or Inconsist Data Addressed by the CO" from the drop down and clarify these discrepancies by completing one of the two RFP Forms titled "CO/COR Certification - Federal" or "CO/COR Certification - State or Local."* The forms contain additional instructions. If you are submitting relevant experience project data from a State or Local government use the form titled "CO/COR Certification - State or Local". If you are submitting relevant experience project data from the Federal government use the form titled "CO/COR Certification - Federal"
FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY
Award ID: In the yellow fill space below enter the award ID award number(s). For a “collection of orders,” list all award IDs in order of highest to lowest based on obligated amount.Assessment (Verified/Not Verified)Rationale (Findings, proposal citations)Action TakenSelf-Score Impact Assessment

Reference IDV: In the yellow fill space below, enter Reference IDV (if award was against an IDIQ/BPA).

Obligated Amount: In the yellow space below, enter the Obligated Amount of the Relevant Experience contract supporting this Relevant Experience Project. If it is a collection of orders enter the sum of the obligated amount for all orders.

Contracting Agencies: In the yellow space below, enter Contracting Agency(ies) (or State/Local Government entity) for which work was performed.

Agency Point of Contact: In the yellow fill space below enter the name and email address of the cognizant Contracting Officer (or equivalent position for State/Local). If the Relevant Experience Project is a collection of orders enter the name and email of the cognizant Contracting Officer who signed the order with the largest funded dollar value.

Item Evaluation Standards and Instructions Offeror Confirmation

1 Confirm Award ID is submitted only once across all Reference Projects.

If Award ID is submitted more than once, the data from the first appearance by Relevant Experience Project Number will be used. Subsequent data will not be considered and all points supported by subsequent data will be deducted from the offerors self-score. This standard applies across both TacCom II technical categories.

2 If submitting a collection of orders as a project, confirm all orders among a "collection of orders" are sourced from the same Reference IDV.

Orders that are added to the Relevant Experience Project that do not reference the same IDV will have all associated data removed from consideration.

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

3 Qualifying Award Type

Enter Qualifying award type from one of the following: (1) a single contract; (2) a single task or delivery order awarded under a Multiple Award contract (as defined below); (3) a single task or delivery order awarded under a master Single Award Indefinite Delivery Delivery/Task Order contract (Definite Quantity, Requirements, or Indefinite Quantity) contract (FAR 16.5); (4) a single delivery/task order placed under a Federal Supply Schedule contract (FAR 8.405-2); (5) a single task or delivery order placed under a master Multiple Award Blanket Purchase Agreement, or (6) a single task or delivery order placed under a master Single Award Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA)(FAR 8.405-3); or (7) a collection of orders.

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

4 Confirm the fully executed (Contracting Officer signed) award document (SF 1449, or equivalent and modifications) is attached. For a collection of orders, each order must be fully executed. RFP L.7.2.3.1

Any contract document that is not fully executed may be removed from consideration and all points supported by that document and other corresponding data will be deducted from the offerors self-score. Offerors may address an unsiged contract or order via the CO certification process according to the instructions in this checklist as well as the direction described in L.7.2.2.

5 Confirm the Contracting Agency is a federal agency, state government, or locality in the United States. (OCONUS for federal agency submission is acceptable if work was in a foreign nation but on a US government base/installation)

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project that is not from a Federal, State or Local Government entity will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

6 Confirm that the total obligated amount is greater than $150K. For a collection of orders, the cumulative obligated amount for the collection of orders must be greater than $150K.

Federal award documents should contain a government funding/appropriation number associated with a dollar amount on the signed contract document. If there are multiple mods then the obligated amount should be the cumulative of those mods. Where a fullly executed award document does not contain a funding/appropriation number, offeror may clarify the missing data by following the instructions at the top of ths checklist.

7 Confirm obligated amount matches the amount shown on the Fully Executed Award Document and Federal Procurement Data System – Next Generation (FPDS-NG) (for federal awards) attachments. For FPDS refer to the "Action Obligation" field.

In the event the values do not match offeror must procure the signature of the CO in accordance with the instructions at the top of this checklist. This item is exempt for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

8 Confirm that for Relevant Experience projects performed for a federal agency, the final FPDS-NG Record (printed directly from FPDS-NG) is attached.

The FPDS must be the full printout from FPDS that shows the competition block. Providing a synopsis of FPDS using the FPDS EZ search is not acceptable. This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

9 For orders against a MA/IDIQ in accordance with FAR 16.505 (b)(1) Fair Opportunity, provide additional confirmation that FPDS substantiates associated points in Self-Scoring Worksheet. Note, if a project is a “collection of orders” placed under a Single-Award or Multiple-Award IDIQ contract or BPA, the predominant proportion of work must have been competed under FAR 16.505 to earn points applicable to this Item.

To claim points for Section 1, Item 7, of the Self-Score Worksheet, the Data Element titled "Fair Opportunity/Limited Sources" in the competition block of the corresponding FPDS record must say either "Fair Opportunity Given", "Follow-On Action Following Competitive Initial Action", or "Competitive Set Aside".

This item is not applicable for offerors submitting State or Local contracts to support a Relevant Experience Project.

10 Confirm that the completion (the end date of the base and any exercised option periods) of the submitted reference project contract or order is later than June 30, 2014. If this Relevant Experience Project is being supported by a collection of delivery/task orders, the order with the highest obligated dollar value must have a completion date after June 30, 2014.

Data associated with reference project contracts or orders whose completion date is prior to June 30, 2014 will not be considered and all associated points will be deducted. The government may rely on the FPDS record to confirm this data. In the event the contract documents conflict with the FPDS record, offerors may follow the instructions at the top of this checklist. If the completion date is not clear on the contract document for state or local contracts, the offeror may follow the instructions at the top of this checklist.

11 Confirm the requirements on the documentation submitted as part of a Relevant Experience Project match the selected Sub-Category.

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project whose requirements do not match the selected sub-category will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

12 Confirm the majority (>51% (based on obligated dollar amount)) of the project requirement aligns to the scope of the subcategory selected. For TC1, ancillary services may contribute to the >51% requirement, provided that the services directly support the delivery of applicable subcategory products under the same order/contract, and the primary purpose of the relevant experience project is for the delivery of supply items relevant to the subcategory. For TC2, the majority (>51%) of the relevant experience project must be for services in the given subcategory.

Where a contract/order is submitted for a relevant experience project and the funded value of the requirements that align to the scope of the sub-category are below 51% of the total value of that contract, that contract/order will not be considered and all points supported by that documentation will be disqualified.

13 Confirm the Statement of Work (or equivalent) AND the Section B Schedule of Supplies and Services is attached.** For a collection of orders include, the SOW and Section B for each order. RFP L.7.2.3.2

14Confirm that yellow highlights in attached SOW clearly indicate requirements match the sub-category.
15Confirm that specific subcategory areas of delivery are manually/electronically labelled in attached SOW and easily identified? (Note: Each sub-category must be clearly labelled and easily identified in order to claim credit on TacCom II Scoring Spreadsheet)
16Confirm the Place(s) of Performance (Delivery/Service Locations) are clearly stated in the SOW/SOO/PWS and are highlighted in Pink?
17Confirm that the most recent "Final" Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) (printed directly from PPIRS) is attached. When a CPARS record exists but is not in “completed” status, submission of the “pending” or draft report is acceptable. When no qualifying CPARS exists, Confirm the Past Performance Rating Form is submitted, and signed by the cognizant CO or COR.

The last date of the period of performance being evaluated must be later than June 30, 2014 and at least 50% of the rated criteria must be rated satisfactory or higher.

If a Past Performance Rating form is submitted and it is not signed by the appropriate rating official either the cognizant CO or COR, it is not valid . If a Past Performance Rating form is submitted and it references multiple orders or contracts, it is not valid (see RFP Section L.7.2.3.4). In all these case points claimed for past performance will be deducted from offeror's self score.

18 Confirm that the Contractor (as indicated on the Award Form) was the prime contractor on the award?

Any contract submitted to support a Relevant Experience Project where the offeror was not the prime contractor will not be considered and all points supported by that document will be deducted from the offerors self-score.

19 Confirm the Contractor Name and DUNS on all the above documents match (or qualifying exception below).

Any contract documentation that does not comply with the following RFP requirement will result in disqualification of that contract documentation from consideration.

Per RFP section L.5.3 - "For any claimed evaluation element identifying a different name other than that of the Offeror, due to a merger, acquisition, novation, or change-of-name agreement, the offeror has the burden to establish that the claimed evaluation element should be attributed to the Offeror. To do so, the offeror must provide evidence of the merger, acquisition, novation, or change-of- name agreement, as well as a justification demonstrating how the evaluation element being claimed is applicable to the Offeror." Reference RFP L.7.2.2 and L.7.2.3.6-8.

19.aNovation: Confirm whether a novation exception applies AND novation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
19.bJV under the SBA’s ASMPP: Confirm whether a JV exeption applies AND supporting documentation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
19.cMeaningful Relationship: Confirm whether a meaningful relationship exception applieas AND supporting documentation is submitted among Relevant Experience Attachments.
*If any Offeror response is ""Missing or Inconsist Data Addressed by the CO" submit the applicable CO-COR Certification Form (Federal/State or Local) among Relevant Experience Atttachments.
**Offerors may submit a Relevance Narrative in support of the Relevant Experience requirements documents.All applicable fields addressed/verified (Yes/No):
Rating (Qualifies/Does Not Qualify/Partially Qualifies):
PROJECT RELEVANCE SUMMARY
Project is relevant to the Technical Sub-CategoryRating Pass/Fail:

F6- Instructions Please reference the RFP and self scoring instructions below for completing the self scoring process. Self scoring will be compared to the references provided for validity.

Procedures
Technical Category 1 Equipment
For vendors wishing to bid on Technical Category 1 - Equipment, please complete the following steps
Step 1:
Vendors should select the category they wish to be scored on from the drop down in B2. This is the category they will need to provide pricing data for in TACCOM II SUBCATEGORY EQUIPMENT PRICING TEMPLATE-2017
Step 2:
Complete Section 1: Project Specific Scoring. For this section, vendors will need to answer questions based on their three projects used for past performance. Please note that for any projects referenced, information will be required to validate the self scoring completed by the vendors. Vendors are required to complete areas highlighted in yellow.

Step 2-1: For Project #1, provide the…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .