TACCOM_II_RELEVANT_EXPERIENCE_FORM.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TACCOM II Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2017036109
About this file
This document contains a Relevant Experience Form and instructions for a federal procurement opportunity. The Relevant Experience Form collects information on previous awards the offeror has completed for the purpose of evaluating relevant past performance. It requests details on prior contracts such as award number, date, agency, value, products/services, and performance period. Supporting documentation must also be provided, including the statement of work with highlights matching the required sub-category, FPDS-NG records, and past performance evaluations. Previous experience will only be considered if all questions are answered affirmatively and the required attachments provided. This process aims to assess offerors' relevant past performance for the upcoming TACCOM II re-compete procurement for tactical communications products and services issued by the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection.
Adding TACCOM II RELEVANT EXPERIENCE FORM
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
TACCOM II has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
8/30/17
Relevant Experience Form
PART I
Offeror Name:
Offeror DUNS:
Technical Category: ___TC1 ___TC2 Sub - Category: ______________________ Project #:____ of ____ (maximum of 3) Project/Award Title: ______________________________________________________
Any Relevant Experience information submitted must be in accordance with the instructions in Section L and must match the FPDS-NG record (not applicable for State/Local project) and all other supporting documentation listed below.
1. Award ID (Award Number):___________________________________________________
2. Contractor Name on Award :___________________________________________ Contractor DUNS on Award :___________________________________________
3. Award Date: ______________________________
4. Reference IDV (if award was against an IDIQ/BPA):_______________________
5. NAICS (Code): ______________
6. Award Type: ________________________________________________________________
7. Contracting Agency (Federal/State/Local): ________________________________
8. Obligated Amount **Must be $150K or greater**: ______________________
9. Period of Performance **Completion date must be later than June 30, 2014**: ______________________________________________________
10. Place(s) of Performance (Delivery/Service Locations):_______________________________
11. Contracting Officer (or equivalent position for State/Local) Name and Email: __________________________________________
12. Contracting Officer’s Representative (or equivalent position for State/Local) Name and Email: _____________________________
Relevant Experience Form
Part II
1. Contracting Agency is a federal agency, state government, or locality in the United States? (OCONUS for federal agency submission is acceptable if work was in a foreign nation but on a US government base/installation) __Y __N
2. Contractor (as indicated on the Award Form) was the prime contractor on the award:
__Y __N
3. Action Obligation is >$150K? __Y __N
4. Requirements on award match the selected Sub-Category (as identified on the top of page 1 of the Relevant Experience Form)? __Y __N
5. The relevant Sub-Category (page 1 of the Relevant Experience Form) is the majority (>50%) of the project requirement? __Y __N
6. Fully executed award document (SF 1449, or equivalent) attached? __Y __N
7. Statement of Work (or equivalent) attached? __Y __N
a) Yellow highlights in attached SOW clearly indicate requirements match the sub-category? __Y __N
b) Specific DHS sub-categories manually/electronically labelled in attached SOW and easily identified? (Note: Each sub-category must be clearly labelled and easily identified in order to claim credit on TacCom II Scoring Spreadsheet) __Y __N
c) Pink highlights in attached SOW indicate delivery/service locations? __Y __N
8. Federal Procurement Data System – Next Generation (FPDS-NG) Record (printed directly from FPDS-NG) attached? (not applicable for State/Local) __Y __N
9. The most recent FAR compliant Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) (printed directly from PPIRS) or Past Performance Rating Form is attached? __Y __N
10. Contractor Name and DUNS on all the above documents match? (or qualifying exception) __Y __N __Novation: Check here if novation is attached __ JV under the SBA’s ASMPP: Check here if supporting documentation is attached __Meaningful Relationship: Check here if Meaningful Relationship Commitment Letter is attached
11. Award ID listed in Part I matches all the above documents and attachments? __Y __N
12. Obligated Amount listed in Part I matches all the above documents and attachments? __Y __N
If answers to all the above questions are “Yes,” this project is qualified as relevant experience. Add this project to the TacCom II Scoring Spreadsheet.
If answers to any of the above questions are “No,” stop here. This project is not qualified as relevant experience and cannot be added to the TacCom II Scoring Spreadsheet.
CO or COR Signature (or equivalent for State/Local)(IF NECESSARY) SEE RFP
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .