TACCOM_II_PAST_PERFORMANCE_RATING_FORM.DOCX

TACCOM II PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS SENDING PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

Section A, PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON, shall be completed by the Offeror (the firm requesting the reference) prior to issuing the questionnaires.

Section B, PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION, shall be completed AND signed by the Rater (only either a Warranted Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer Representative with cognizance over the submitted project)

Section C, RATINGS, shall be completed by the Rater.

No other format or additional proposal documentation will be considered in support of past performance data. The Offeror shall ensure that completed forms are submitted with its proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS TO RATER:

In order to assess potential vendors under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Tactical Communications (TacCom) II procurement, past performance information with respect to each Offeror is required. As the Executive Agent for this acquisition, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Office of Acquisition requests your support in obtaining past performance data for the project identified in Section A. Note, this form is only required from the Offeror when PPIRS information does not exist. As the Warranted Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer’s Representative with cognizance over the submitted project, which the firm identified in Section A of this questionnaire, please complete Sections B and C. Please sign Section B using either ink or electronic signature. After completing Section B and C of the questionnaire, please return to the Offeror (the firm requesting the reference).

In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. This is a major DHS acquisition and will be a Multi-Agency Contract (MAC). Your input into this evaluation is greatly appreciated. If you have questions regarding this questionnaire or require assistance, please submit inquiries to Theodore.J.Langel@cbp.dhs.gov AND Claire.A.Breen@cbp.dhs.gov Sincerely, Robert Abood, Contracting Officer

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

Section A PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

Section B PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):

Section C RATINGS (To be filled out by the Rater):

For each of the five (5) rating areas listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

2. SCHEDULE

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. COST CONTROL

This rating area is not applicable to fixed price contracts

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

4. MANAGEMENT

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

5. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104