2-Notice of Intent to Award (Sole Source) School Book Depository (1).docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ACWESPP - Mountain States School Depository
- Solicitation number
- PCSD03182026
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
Summary
This is a Notice of Intent to Award a Contract Without Engaging in a Standard Procurement Process issued by the Provo City School District Department of Purchasing in Utah. The procurement unit seeks to award a sole-source contract to Mountain States Textbook Depository for the provision of a depository in the State of Utah that meets requirements outlined in R277-469 by the Utah State Board of Education. The contract term is five years with an option for an additional five-year renewal. The estimated contract value is $15,000,000. The procurement unit justifies the sole-source award based on the determination that there is only one source for the procurement item, as required by the Utah State Board of Education rule that mandates publishers offer a depository within Utah or maintain their own depository to provide school districts access to instructional materials and avoid extended waiting periods or excessive fees. Market research included internet searches for alternative depositories in Utah, consultation with other school districts and the Department of Education, and review of existing state and district cooperative contracts.
Freight costs are calculated at 2.85 percent of the subtotal purchase price under F.O.B. Destination, Freight Prepaid terms. The procurement unit indicates that schools' only alternative to using the depository is to purchase textbooks directly from publishers. The notice provides a public comment period during which any interested and qualified vendors may submit documentation demonstrating that competing sources exist for the procurement item, that their firm can provide comparable or superior products meeting or exceeding specifications, or that transitional costs would be lower with an alternative vendor. No valid challenges received during the public notice period would result in contract award to Mountain States Textbook Depository without competition.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 3-Textbooks Rule for Mtn. States.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD A CONTRACT WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS
The Provo City School District (“PCSD”) Department of Purchasing is publishing this notice pursuant to the Utah Procurement Code. The Conducting Procurement Unit submitted this form claiming that it intends to award a contract without competition if it is determined by the Department of Purchasing, in writing, that:
· there is only one source for the procurement item;
· transitional costs are a significant consideration in selecting a procurement item; or
· the award of a contract is under circumstances, described in rules adopted by the applicable rulemaking authority, that make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit.
In the subsequent pages the Conducting Procurement Unit has identified its justification for wanting to award a contract without engaging in standard procurement process.
Determination of Other Interested Vendors The intent of this notice is to determine if there are any other interested and qualified vendors that meet the specifications of this notice. Any such vendors must submit the following information:
· The name of the contesting person; and
· A detailed explanation of the challenge, including documentation showing that there are other competing sources for the procurement item.
In addition, a vendor should include:
· Documentation that your firm can provide a comparable or better procurement item that meets or exceeds the specifications;
· Documentation that your firm can also provide the same proprietary procurement item or an equivalent procurement item; and
· If transitional costs are identified as the justification for this notice, submit a cost comparison of the identified transitional costs with your firm’s anticipated transitional costs.
Regardless of any prior communications with the PCSD Department of Purchasing, all vendors interested in responding to this notice must submit a response to this posting containing complete responses to all of the information requested above.
DO NOT CONTACT THE CONDUCTING PROCUREMENT UNIT. Any questions regarding this notice, including obtaining additional information, can be obtained through the PCSD Department of Purchasing during the publication period. No action is required if you agree with this Notice.
If, after the public notice period has passed, the Department of Purchasing determines that there are other interested and qualified vendors that meet the specifications of this notice, the Department of Purchasing will not award a contract pursuant to this notice.
If, after the public notice period has passed, no valid challenges have been received, then the Department of Purchasing may award a contract to the identified vendor without competition.
Please read the entire form very carefully before responding to this notice.
It is anticipated that this procurement will result in a:
| RESULT |
| ACTION |
|X|
Agency Contract
1. The term of this contract will be: 5 years with another 5-year renewal option.
2. The Conducting Procurement Unit may not make the procurement until the solicitation process is completed and a contract is written and signed by the procurement unit, the vendor, and the Department of Purchasing.
| Purchase Order |
| The Conducting Procurement Unit may not make the procurement until after the solicitation process is completed, the purchase order is signed by the Department of Purchasing. |
| Estimated value of the contract/purchase order: |
| $15,000,000 |
| Freight Cost (F.O.B. Destination, Freight Prepaid): |
| 2.85% of the subtotal purchase price |
| Vendor Name: |
| Mountain States Textbook Depository |
Explain in detail the service or product to be procured: Depository in the State of Utah that meets the requirements outlined in R277-469 by the Utah State Board of Education
Complete disclosure must be included with this request if the requester has any personal, financial, or fiduciary relationship with the vendor. (Please Attach) N/A
CHECK THE BOX THAT IDENTIFIES WHY A CONTRACT SHOULD BE AWARDED WITHOUT ENGAGING IN A STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS:
| |X| |
| There is only one source for the procurement item. |
| Complete section A |
| |_| |
| Transitional costs are a significant consideration in selecting a procurement item and |
the results of a cost-benefit analysis demonstrate that transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive, and that the award of a contract without engaging in a standard procurement process is in the best interest of the procurement unit Complete section B
| |_| |
| The award of a contract is under circumstances, described in rules adopted by the applicable rulemaking authority, that make awarding the contract through a standard procurement process impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit. |
| Complete section C |
SECTION A: ONLY ONE SOURCE
| 1. |
| What is unique about this procurement item to justify an award of contract without engaging in a standard procurement process? (Explain in detail why the service or product is only available from a single supplier.) |
The State of Utah Board of Education requires that publishers offer a depository within the State of Utah, or that they maintain their own depository for school books purchased by the various school districts within the state, for access to materials and to avoid long waiting periods to obtain additional materials or pay exorbitant fees.
This is per (2)(a) A publisher seeking to sell recommended materials to Utah schools or school districts shall have 10 books and tangible adopted materials or such other amount as required by a depository based on anticipated need on deposit within the state at an instructional materials depository in the business of selling instructional materials to schools or school districts in Utah.
(b) A publisher shall submit verification of compliance with Subsection (2)(a) to the Superintendent through the publisher's contracted depository prior to the Superintendent posting a review of the materials on RIMs.
(3) A publisher may make a depository agreement with one or more depositories.
(4) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (2), a publisher may sell instructional materials to schools or school districts in Utah directly or through means other than a designated depository.
| 2. |
| Could the procurement item be reasonably modified to allow for competition? |
Not for depositories, schools' only other option is direct from the publisher purchases of texts.
| 3. |
| Explain the market research performed. |
Searched the internet for other depositories in the State of Utah, spoke with other school districts, and the Department of Education.
| 4. |
| What research have you conducted to ensure the requested procurement item is not available on an existing state or district cooperative contract? |
Reviewed State Contracts and District contracts
| 5. |
| If there is only one source for the procurement item, list the names of other similar vendors contacted, the contact person, and a summary of their response. |
SECTION B: TRANSITIONAL COSTS
| 1. |
| Describe the existing equipment, technology, software, accessories, replacement parts, or service, hereafter referred to as equipment; include the original purchase price and date of purchase for the existing equipment. |
| 2. |
| Please supply the following: |
| a. |
| Procurement method that was used to purchase the existing equipment? (IFB, RFP, Sole Source): |
| b. |
| Solicitation number, RQS number, or sole source number for the existing equipment: |
| c. |
| Contract number for the existing equipment: |
| 3. |
| Attach the cost-benefit analysis, as required by Utah Code Section 63G-6a-802 that demonstrates that transitional costs are unreasonable or cost-prohibitive. |
SECTION C: STANDARD PROCUREMENT PROCESS IMPRACTICABLE
| 1. |
| Cite the applicable rule adopted by the applicable rulemaking authority that provides that awarding the contract through a standard procurement process is impractical and not in the best interest of the procurement unit under the circumstances; including any supporting documentation. |
| 2. |
| Please supply the following, if applicable: |
| a. |
| Procurement method that was used to purchase the existing equipment? (IFB, RFP, Sole Source): |
| b. |
| Solicitation number, RQS number, or sole source number for the existing equipment: |
| c. |
| Contract number for the existing equipment |
Revised September 29, 2019
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .