2._EDD_ICMS_RFP_Pre-Soliciation_Feedback_Form.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pre-Solicitation for EDD ICMS
- Solicitation number
- 0000031599
- Issued by
- California
About this file
This document is a Pre-Solicitation Feedback Form for the Employment Development Department's (EDD) Integrated Claims Management System (ICMS) solicitation in the state of California. The form requests vendor feedback on various aspects of the Statement of Work (SOW) and related solicitation documents, including concerns about meeting project timelines and deliverables, assumptions and dependencies, clarity and completeness of requirements, areas that may be overly prescriptive or limit the vendor's ability to deliver services effectively, and recommended adjustments to milestones, deliverables, and Service Level Agreements (SLAs). The form also seeks input on the cost workbook, staff qualifications, and any additional information needed to prepare a response.
The feedback gathered through this process will be used to refine the solicitation documents prior to the formal release of the Request for Proposal (RFP). Vendors are asked to provide their name, contact information, and detailed feedback on the various sections of the SOW and related exhibits. The feedback will help ensure the final solicitation documents address the needs of the EDD and provide vendors with a clear understanding of the requirements and expectations for this project.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4._EDD_ICMS_Exhibit_C_-_Detailed_Requirements.xlsm | XLSM spreadsheet | |
| 1._EDD_ICMS_Pre-solicitation_Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3._EDD_ICMS_EXHIBIT_A_-_STATEMENT_OF_WORK.pdf | ||
| 5._EDD_ICMS_EXHIBIT_D_-_COST_WORKBOOK.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 6._EDD_ICMS_RFP_Attachments_and_Exhibits.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions
| The State has created a document for response to questions and vendor questions/feedback. The CDT Procurement Officer requests the use of this Microsoft Excel workbook when submitting responses, questions and feedback. Instructions are listed as follows: |
| State Questions tab: |
| · Name of Firm – Please provide the name of the firm submitting questions/feedback. |
| · Contact Person – Provide the name of the person to contact if the State needs clarification about the question or feedback. |
| · Contact Email and Phone Number – Provide the email and phone number (including area code) for the listed contact person. |
| · Q # - There are 19 questions in a total of seven (7) categories in which the Vendor needs to answer. |
| · Question – State’s question. |
| · Answer – Write the response to the question in this column. |
| Additional Vendor Feedback tab: |
| · Q # - Sequentially number each question/feedback starting at one (1). |
| · Artifact – Vendor to select from the drop-down list which document the question/feedback pertains to. |
| · Section # - Identify the section number(s) and title that the question/feedback pertains to. |
| · Question/Feedback – Write the question/feedback in this column. |
| Expand or reduce the number of rows to accommodate the number of questions / feedback of each submission |
State Questions
| Pre-Solicitation Feedback Form |
| Name of Firm: |
| Contact Person: |
| Contact Email and Phone Number: |
| Q # | Question | Answer |
| 1 | Project Management and Implementation Questions: | |
| 1.1 | Do you have any concerns about meeting the project timeline and deliverables specified in the Statement of Work (SOW)? | |
| 2 | Requirements, Section 6 in SOW & Exhibit C: | |
| 2.1 | Are there assumptions, constraints, or dependencies that need to be considered for this solicitation? | |
| 2.2 | Are additional materials needed for you to evaluate the degree of integration for the proposed solution within the project timelines and costs? | |
| 2.3 | Are there any requirements which may prevent you from submitting a response? If so, what are they, and why would they prevent you from responding? | |
| 2.4 | Are there any areas within the SOW and Exhibit C that you find: | |
| 2.4.1 | Overly prescriptive? | |
| 2.4.2 | May have been overlooked, are inconsistent, contradictory, or are not clear? | |
| 2.4.3 | Potentially limiting your ability to deliver the requested services effectively? | |
| 2.4.4 | Onerous or which may result in unnecessary costs or risks to the State? If so, please indicate which ones and explain why. | |
| 2.4.5 | Introduces significant risks to project completion or objectives? | |
| 3 | Cost, Exhibit D: | |
| 3.1 | Are there areas in the Cost Workbook that are inconsistent with industry standards? | |
| 3.2 | Are there any additional costs or factors we should consider that are not detailed in the SOW and Cost Workbook | |
| 4 | Staff Qualifications, Section 10, and Attachment 13 (13.1 - 13.15): | |
| 4.1 | Are the Qualifications clear and understandable? | |
| 4.2 | Are there any Qualifications that are overly restrictive and may prevent you from bidding? | |
| 5 | Milestones/Deliverables, Section 14 in SOW: | |
| 5.1 | Are there any recommended adjustments to the outlined milestones/deliverables? | |
| 6 | 6. | Service Level Agreements (SLAs), Sections 35 & 36 in SOW: |
| 6.1 | Are there areas within the SLAs that seem contradictory, overlooked, or are not clear? | |
| 6.2 | Are there recommended adjustments to the SLAs? | |
| 7 | Other: | |
| 7.1 | Are there additional questions pertinent to the draft solicitation artifacts? | |
| 7.2 | Is any additional information needed to prepare a response? |
Additional Vendor Feedback
| Pre-Solicitation Feedback Form |
| Name of Firm: |
| Contact Person: |
| Contact Email and Phone Number: |
| Q # | Artifact(s) | Section # | Question |
| 1 | |||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | |||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | |||
| 9 | |||
| 10 |
Lists
| Artifact |
| ATTACHMENT 11 |
| ATTACHMENT 12 |
| ATTACHMENT 13 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.1 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.2 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.3 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.4 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.5 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.6 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.7 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.8 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.9 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.10 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.11 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.12 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.13 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.14 |
| ATTACHMENT 13.15 |
| ATTACHMENT 18 |
| ATTACHMENT 21 |
| EXHIBIT A |
| EXHIBIT C |
| EXHIBIT D |
| EXHIBIT E |
| EXHIBIT F |
| EXHIBIT F-1 |
| EXHIBIT F-2 |
| EXHIBIT F-3 |
| EXHIBIT G |
| EXHIBIT H |
| EXHIBIT I |
| EXHIBIT J |
| EXHIBIT K |
| EXHIBIT L |
| EXHIBIT M |
| EXHIBIT N |
| EXHIBIT O |
| EXHIBIT P |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .