2.2.1 Attachment 1 - Technical Evaluation Critera_DR4673-FL Debris Removal.pdf

Attachment 1 Subject: Technical Evaluation Criteria

TECHNICAL EVALUATION

• This attachment outlines the criteria the Government will use in evaluating the offeror’s proposals regarding Unarmed Security Monitors/Guards in support of DR4673-FL. The Government will evaluate each offeror’s capabilities and proposal elements against the below evaluation criteria set forth.

• The Government intends to issue a single fixed rate/labor hour purchase order under this request for quote to the offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government.

• A rating of Unsatisfactory on any non-priced factors will render the entire proposal technically unacceptable; therefore, not eligible for award. The non-priced factors are listed below in order of importance (i.e. Factor 1 is most important).

• Pricing will be evaluated in accordance with the offeror’s pricing spreadsheet, market research on current market rates, size and scope of requirement for fairness and reasonableness.

Proposals will be considered for evaluation only if the offeror’s SAM registration is current/active, and the offeror provides documentation they currently reside in or doing business in the designated disaster declared county (Lee).

SAM Registration Contractor shall provide the following:

1. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) number

2. Confirmation of complete Active SAMs registration

3. FAR 52.226-3 Disaster or Emergency Area Representation.

(a) Set-aside area. The area covered in this contract is: (Lee County) Fort Myers, FL 33908

(b) Representations. The offeror represents that it □ does □ does not reside or primarily do business in the designated set-aside area.

Factor 1. Technical Approach – Company’s Capability/Experience

The Contractor's proposal response shall be evaluated based on the Company’s current experience and capabilities to mobilize immediately and complete the vetting process to commence unarmed guard services at the Heritage Height Group site located at 10660 Golden Journey Road, Fort Myers, FL 33908

The contractor’s response shall be evaluated on its ability to provide and/or demonstrate the method of project management and oversight capability per group site. The Contractor must demonstrate its knowledge and thorough and comprehensive understanding of the requirement for unarmed security monitors/guards and include staffing dedicated to Heritage Heights group site. This plan should seek to demonstrate the offeror’s ability to direct and control the operation of all requirements outlined in the statement of work.

The proposal response should also address resolution of any issues/hazards/injuries that may arise during assignment or examples of previous issues and chosen solution that resolved the situation safely and professionally.

Factor 3: Past Performance The submitted past performance experiences shall be past operations similar to the requirements set forth in this solicitation. Past experience summaries shall be based on previous years of experience for armed or unarmed guard services over the past 1-3 years or currently in process.

Experience may include current residents and/or Contracts entered into with the Federal Government, agencies of State and local governments, and commercial customers. Contracts with a parent or an affiliate of the offeror may not be used.

The Government will consider the above information, as well as information obtained from any other sources when evaluating the offeror’s experience. The past performance evaluation will assess the Offeror's record of relevant and recent work for government and private sector clients.

Factor 4. Cost or Price Evaluation In accordance with FAR Subpart 12.209, the Contracting Officer shall determine that a prospective contractor is responsible and that the prices offered are reasonable before awarding the contract. The contracting officer must ensure that contract terms, conditions, and prices are commensurate with the Government’s need.

The technical evaluation rating criteria for Factors 1 and 2 are as follow:

Rating DESCRIPTION Superior Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the requirements and provides a proposal response in accordance with the statement of work that significantly exceeds performance or capability standards.

Good Demonstrates a good understanding of the requirement and proposed approach meets performance or capability standards.

Satisfactory Demonstrates an understanding of the requirement and some weakness in the approach that could use minor adjustments to meet performance or capability standards.

Marginal Demonstrates a shallow/deficient understanding of the requirement and only marginally meets performance or capability standards necessary for minimal but acceptable contract performance.

Unsatisfactory Fails to demonstrate the requirement needs, and the expectation of risk is high.

Definitions:

• Strengths - An element of a proposal which exceeds a requirement of the solicitation in a beneficial way to the Government.

• Weakness - A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

• Deficiency- A material failure of an offer to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in an offer that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

The Past Performance rating criteria are as follows:

The government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevance.

The following definitions apply:

Very Relevant: Past/present performance effort involved essentially the same magnitude of effort, complexities, and contract dollars this task order proposal requires.

Relevant: Past/present performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort, complexities, and contract dollars this task order proposal requires.

Rating System for Past Performance Evaluation Factors:

Superior: Based on the offeror’s past performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory: Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is likely that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unsatisfactory: Based on the offeror’s past performance record, it is not likely that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort Neutral rating indicates a new debris removal Company without a record of past performance of ownership, or for whom information on relevant past performance is not available.

3. FAR 52.226-3 Disaster or Emergency Area Representation.