2-06. Sample Score Sheet.doc
DOC document 81 KB Posted
- Attached to
- UDOT IDIQ - Electrical Contractors for EVSE
- Solicitation number
- UDOT270061MP-1
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a proposal evaluation score sheet for the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) Solicitation #UDOT270XXXMP AVL, which concerns Electrical Contractors for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). The document functions as a structured assessment tool for evaluating contractor proposals submitted in response to this invitation for multiple contract awards. The scoring sheet does not specify response dates, due dates, site visits, bidders' meetings, or award dates within its content. The evaluation process is designed to result in multiple contract awards for qualified electrical contractors capable of providing EVSE services.
The evaluation process consists of two stages: Stage 1 assesses mandatory minimum requirements including current Utah Business License, State of Utah E-200 Vendors License, required liability insurance, surety bonding capability, identified service region, and general contractor eligibility. Proposals failing any mandatory requirement are eliminated from further consideration. Stage 2 applies a detailed technical evaluation scored on a 60-point scale, with weightings applied to three criteria: Past Experience (30 points with 6x weight), Project Understanding of highway construction processes (10 points with 2x weight), and Personnel Experience and Qualifications including resource mobilization ability (20 points with 4x weight). Scoring utilizes a five-point scale ranging from Excellent to Poor, with specific definitions provided for each rating level and provisions for non-responsive designations when requirements are unaddressed or information is incomplete or missing.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-02. Attachment B- AVL Scope of Work for Approved Vendor List.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-03. Submittal Form- Vendor Set Up Form And W-9.pdf | ||
| 8-01. Solicitation Information- IDIQ 2026-11-02.doc | DOC document | |
| 7-08. Map- 5 regions.pdf | ||
| 4-05. Submittal Form- Attachment A- Agency Terms and Conditions- Yes No.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-04. Submittal Form- Business Confidentiality- Yes No.doc | DOC document | |
| 5-07. Submittal Form- Certifications- Yes No.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #UDOT270XXXMP AVL- Electrical Contractors for EVSE Proposal Evaluation Score Sheet
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Stage 1: Determination of Responsiveness:
| Mandatory Minimum Requirements |
| Pass |
| Fail |
| Notes |
1. Current Utah Business License
2. Current State of Utah’s E-200 Vendors License
3. Required Liability Insurance
4. Letter from Surety Company/Able to be bonded
5. Identified service region
6. Contractor meets requirements
Responses that fail in any of the above will not proceed on to the Technical Evaluation Stage.
Stage 2: Detailed Technical Evaluation:
| EVALUATION CRITERIA |
| Points Possible |
| Score |
(1 - 5)
| Weight |
| Points |
1. Past Experience (30 points)
| · Past projects |
| 30 points |
X 6
2. Project Understanding (10 points)
| · Understanding of highway construction processes |
| 10 points |
X 2
3. Personnel Experience and Qualifications (20 points)
| · Ability to mobilize resources |
| 20 points |
X 4
Total Technical Evaluation Points (60 points possible)
Determination:
NR = Non Responsive. Response does not address requirement.
Scoring:
(a) Five points (Excellent): The proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP;
(b) Four points (Good): The proposal addresses all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP and, in some respects, exceeds them;
(c) Three points (Satisfactory): The proposal addresses all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner;
(d) Two points (Unsatisfactory): The proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner; or
(e) One point (Poor): The proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RTF or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information; or
(f) Zero (Fail): The proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information.
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .