SF-30 - Amendment 1 - QandA.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

A0001

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07/21/2025

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

PR15334286

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

AMERICAN EMBASSY LISBON

AV. DAS FORCAS ARMADAS, ATTN: GSO/PROCUREMENT

LISBOA 1649-044

PORTUGAL

GSO/Procurement

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street,city,county,State,and ZIP Code)

9a. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

19P05025Q0016

Prospective Offerors

9b. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) 07/08/2025

10a. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10b. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The time and date specified for receipt of Offers [] is extended, [ ] is not extended Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the time and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning _______ copies of the amendment;(b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers.

FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such a change may be made by telegram or letter, provided with each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF:

X

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [X ] is required to sign this document and return __1_ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is: to answer all questions to Prospective Offerors.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

16A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

Jonathan Nwosu

15B. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C.DATE

SIGNED

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C.DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 Standard Form 30 (revised 10/83)

Adjustable-Height Man Crawler Lift

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

RFQ 19P05025Q0016

1) What power source the US Embassy in Lisbon Portugal uses. Is it 230v 50Hz or 120v

60Hz?

European standards - 3 phase – 400 V/50Hz and single face 230 V /50 Hz.

2) Would the end user consider a crawler lift with a max working height of 101 ft 8 in?

Offerors are encouraged to make their best proposals given the technical specifications supplied. All offers will be considered and evaluated during the technical evaluation phase of the procurement process

3) Would the Embassy be exempt from any European VAT and would it also be exempt from any US tariffs imposed on the European Union?

Embassy Lisbon is not exempt. Please quote with VAT and or any other additional charges

4) We have carefully reviewed both the technical specifications required in the Statement of Work (SOW) and the LEO35Tplus data sheet. Accordingly, we have prepared a comparison table which is attached to this email for your reference.

We would like to kindly request clarification on the following:

Can the LEO35Tplus be considered an acceptable equivalent model for this procurement, considering that it meets or exceeds nearly all of the technical specifications?

Offerors are encouraged to make their best proposals given the technical specifications supplied. All offers will be considered and evaluated during the technical evaluation phase of the procurement process.