Questions and Answers 19AQMM22R0229 20220719.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ozark T53 (series) Engine Repairs
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM22R0229
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 Revised SOW 20220719.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM22R0229 1 JULY 2022.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 CLIN Pricing Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire T53.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 QA Template.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question # | Section / Attachment Number | Page Number and Paragraph | Solicitation Requirement | Question | Answer |
| 1. | Statement of Work | Page 2 Para 3.2.1 | Loss of Certification (Termination) | Would the vendor loss of certification resulting in INL/A’s contract termination be for Convenience or Cause? | Termination would be for "Cause" as Para 3.2 sub Para 3.2.1 indicates "a material breach of contract" would have occurred, "which may, at the discretion of the Contracting Officer (CO), result in contract termination.". Also Para 3.1.1 sets a requirement "Contractor facility shall be a FAA Part 145 authorized repair station, …..." |
| 2. | Statement of Work | Page 3 Para 3.5.1.3. | Documentation (FAA Compliant Forms) | The FAA discourages Repair Stations from utilizing FAA forms on military material, is a serviceable/unserviceable tag with the item identification information (MFR/PN/SN) listing the item’s condition and QA stamp sufficient? | An 8130-3 or a Certificate of Conformance done in the shops letterhead describing the item, and approving it for return to service will suffice/meet the requirement described in Para 3.5.1.3 |
| 3. | Statement of Work | Page 5 Para 3.9.2, 3.11.1, & 4.2 | 3.9.2 Inspection, 3.11.1 Turnaround Time, & 4.2 (Delivery) | SoW 3.9.2 indicated 30 calendar days to inspect and evaluate T53 material and after approval 3.11.1 contractor shall have a maximum of 180 calendar days from the time of notification to ship material. That would result in 210 days processing time without time for INL/A to approve the work. 4.2 limits the total time to process material to 187 calendar days. Would you please clarify contractual time lines? | _Para 3.9.2 is clear and no revision required. |
_Para 3.11.1 changed (see revised SOW posted 7/19/2022) _Para 4.2 changed to reflect 180 calendar days from time of notification (Quote approval)
| 4. | SF 1499 | Page 65 Para 9 conflict with Page 72 Para 10 | (2) Tab 2 – Identification of Recent and Relevant Efforts Vs. 1. Recency Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. | To be recent, past performance | |
| must not be older than five (5) years from the date of release of this solicitation. Vs. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past 3 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Please clarify, what are the recency requirements, 3 or 5 years? | Recency Assessment is 3 years |
&1#&"Times New Roman"&10&K000000SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .