6.10.26_Reply of Questions+191NLE26Q0072.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 81 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INL Kyiv EOD Equipment for NPU and SGBS
- Solicitation number
- 191NLE26Q0072
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document from a federal contract opportunity for INL Kyiv EOD (Explosive Ordnance Disposal) Equipment. The solicitation, numbered 191NLE26Q0072, is issued by the Department of State Office of Acquisition Management through the INL (International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Bureau) and seeks equipment for the NPU (National Police of Ukraine) and SGBS (State Guard Service of Ukraine).
The Q&A document addresses a single administrative clarification regarding delivery terms. An offeror requested modification of the delivery terms to Delivery At Place (DAP) to Kyiv, rather than delivery to the United States, to improve efficiency and reduce timeline delays for the end user in Ukraine. The offeror notes that delivering directly to Ukraine would provide greater value to both the USG and the end user compared to shipping through the United States first. The government's response confirms that if the offered equipment meets technical requirements and specifications, the delivery terms can be updated to DAP to the end user location. The question submission deadline was 10:00 A.M. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 9, 2026, with the RFQ closing date and time also specified as 10:00 A.M. Eastern Time on Tuesday (specific date not fully visible). All questions and responses were to be directed to Mohan Krishnakumar, Contracting Officer, at KrishnakumarM@state.gov.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 191NLE26Q0072 INL Kyiv EOD Equipment for NPU and SGU.pdf | ||
| 191NLE26Q0072 INL Kyiv EOD Equip for NGU and SGU.pdf | ||
| Questions 191NLE26Q0072.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Clarifications
| Identifier | Technical, Cost, or Admin | RFP Section and Page Reference | Question or Clarification Request | Offeror Recommendation (if any) | Government Response to Question | |
| *Note: Answers must be complete, well-written, and address all aspects of the question or clarification request. The goal is to provide adequate information so an additional round of Q&A results in few or no follow-up questions. | Change to RFQ? If so, where? | |||||
| 1 | Admin | Section 4.6; Page 9 | We have the ability to deliver direct to the end user in Ukraine to decrease the delivery timeline to the end user substantially. The product is not being delivered to the USA and therefore would be inefficient to deliver to the USA just for the USG to ship it back to Ukraine. |
Please clarify the delivery terms for this opportunity. Recommend changing delivery terms of RFQ to DAP - Kyiv to simplify the acquisition process & maximize value to the USG & end user. a. The offering should meet technical requirements and is what is being requested or equal to. b. If so, then delivery terms can be updated for Delivery At Place (DAP) to the end user.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .