The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4906 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation) Updated June 2, 2015
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| Vendor meets the two year minimum in business requirement |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| Vendor has current Municipal Board of Health License on file with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and produced a copy of this license |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| The Following is for Vendors who responded to Category III only: Vendor provided Room Rate pricing for overnight accommondations |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Satisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Good: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Very Good: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Excellent: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 16MAPROMS1 COMMBUYS Document #:
BD-16-1026-DOE02-DOE01-00000005774
Score Unsatisfactory 0 pts Score Satisfactory 1 pt Score Good 2 pts Score Very Good 3 pts Score Excellent 4 pts Score Outstanding 5 pts
Awarded (Score 0–5 x Multiplier) Maximum Points Available (5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| Pricing submitted for response and services provided are clearly defined and explained for each service provided in an all inclusive manner, where applicable. |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| Vendor is able to provide services in the category in which they submitted a response to and clearly define how these qualifications meet the requirements of the category |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| Vendor submitted required three written references requested and these references appropriately describe the services the vendor is able to provide and requirements that will meet the need of the Department. |
| (x4) |
| 20 |
| Vendor provide a menu with pricing and the menu offers a variety of items to select from, including, but not limited to, vegetarian, gluten-free, kosher. |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
| Supplier Diversity Program Plan Form 1 submitted and complete with a percentage commitment with an SDP approved partner. Percentage rates will be scored based on the following: .05% -.09% = 1 pt, 1% - 1.4% = 2 pts, 1.5% - 1.9% = 3 pts, 2.0% – 2.4% = 4 pts 2.5%+ = 5 pts |
| (x2) |
| 10 |
| The Following Criteria is for vendors who responded to Categories II and III only: Vendor has submitted a map and description of each conference room available, AV services available in each of these rooms and Internet Connectivity availability in each of these rooms. |
| (x3) |
| 15 |
Vendors responding to Category I only must meet a minimum score of 65 to be awarded. Vendors responding to Category II or III must receive a minimum score of 75.
image1.png image2.png