January 22, 2024 REV May 13, 2026

City of Scranton Office of Economic and Community Development 340 North Washington Ave

Scranton, PA 18503

Attn: Brian Phillips Community Development Coordinator / Blight Specialist

RE: 1610 Roselynn Street, Scranton, PA 18510 City of Scranton Office of Economic and Community Development City of Scranton, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania

Dear Mr. Phillips, Barry Isett and Associates, Inc. visited the property known as 1610 Roselynn Street, Scranton, PA 18510, on Thursday, January 18, 2024 and again on May 13, 2026. During the site visit, the structure was evaluated for demolition. The evaluation was based on visual inspection of the exterior. No portions of the interior were visible at the time of the site visit. The conditions present in the field on the day of the site visit indicate that the property is in a state of disrepair. Public safety hazards include unsecure openings, overgrown vegetation, an accumulation of refuse, deterioration of the building envelope and collapsing front, side and rear porch structures. In our opinion, the structure is likely beyond repair exceeding 85% or more of the value and should be demolished but is not deemed an emergency demolition.

Should you have any questions or comments regarding this information, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

Sincerely, Amos Valenti

Project Manager

Project Management & Construction

Services

LIMITED ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS INSPECTION

Throughout:

1610 ROSELYN STREET

SCRANTON, PA 18510

Prepared for:

SCRANTON OFFICE OF ECOMONIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

340 NORTH WASHINGTON AVENUE (MUNICIPAL BUILDING),

SCRANTON, PA 18503

Attention:

Mr. Brian Phillips

Prepared by:

QUAD THREE GROUP, INC.

37 NORTH WASHINGTON STREET

WILKES-BARRE, PENNSYLVANIA 18701

PH. (570) 829 - 4200

FAX (570) 829 - 0302

PROJECT # 13030.04.54

UPDATED

JUNE 2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………….1.

II. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………..1.

III. SURVEY AREA AND DISCUSSION……………………………....2.

IV. MATERIALS SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL…………………...2.

V. INSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS…………3.

VI. ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS ABATEMENT………..3.

COST

VII. INSPECTION DISCLAIMER………………………………………..4.

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A ASBESTOS ANALYSIS RESULTS

APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOS

APPENDIX C CERTIFICATIONS

LIMITED ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS INSPECTION

Prepared for:

Scranton Office of Economic and Community Development 340 North Washington Avenue (Municipal Building), Scranton, PA 18503

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

An Asbestos Containing Materials Inspection was conducted on May 16th, 2024 and updated in June 2026, within the planned demolition site located at 1610 Roselyn Street, Scranton, Pennsylvania. The purpose of the inspection was to determine if asbestos containing materials exist within the structure. Mr. William Sterling (PA Asbestos Inspector #057069) of Quad Three Group, Inc. conducted the inspection in conjunction with demolition scheduled at the structure.

As part of this asbestos inspection, the quantities and conditions of asbestos containing materials were identified. A total of two (2) layers of material samples were collected and analyzed.

Asbestos containing materials (ACM) were not identified on the accessible areas of the structure located at 1610 Roselyn Street, Scranton, Pennsylvania

Materials that were non-suspect or were sampled and through analysis found to not contain asbestos include exterior concrete foundation. Descriptions of all the material samples collected can be found in Appendix A.

The conclusions presented in this report are the result of the coalition, compilation and analysis of samples and other information obtained during the inspection. The results presented in this report represent the conditions present at the time of the inspection. Quad Three Group has no control over conditions or events that occurred following the date of inspection.

II. INTRODUCTION

On May 16 th, 2024, and updated June 2026, a limited asbestos inspection was performed within 1610 Roselyn Street, Scranton, Pennsylvania. The purpose of the inspection was to visually locate, identify and quantify asbestos containing materials (ACM) as they exist within the structure scheduled for demolition. The survey / inspection process included:

A. Inspecting the area to identify representative “suspected” asbestos-containing materials, types and sampling sites.

B. Collecting representative samples from any suspect material in order to identify all

Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). Examples of these materials include Pipe insulation, plaster, sheet-rock, floor tiles, linoleum, etc.

1.

C. Sampling was performed by experienced, licensed personnel utilizing semi -destructive sampling techniques in an attempt to locate asbestos containing materials.

D. Laboratory analysis of the materials sampled was performed at an accredited laboratory using the EPA recommended method of polarized light microscopy (PLM) for friable samples.

III. SURVEY AREA DISCUSSION

The property was comprised of a three-story structure at 1610 Roselyn Street. The interior of the structure offered limited access at the time of the inspection due to unknown structural conditions. Holes in the roof and third floor of the structure as well as collapsed stairs rendered the structure unsafe for entry. The Inspection was limited to the accessible areas of the structure. Major structural components include concrete, brick, stone, block, and wood.

IV. MATERIALS SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

The building inspection was conducted by an inspector, qualified by experience, education and training in the recognition of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM). An initial walk through was conducted to identify suspect asbestos containing materials and to group them into homogeneous sampling areas.

Following the walkthrough, the number of samples required to determine the presence of ACM in the study areas was determined. Sample collection was performed with the intent to identify and locate asbestos containing materials and to group them into homogeneous material categories. This grouping allowed the inspectors to identify like materials within the facility to avoid over sampling or mischaracterization of an asbestos containing material.

The majority of the ACM samples were located utilizing non-destructive techniques. Some areas of ACM may still exist in areas that could not be accessed until complete interior demolition is completed.

Representative samples of each “suspect asbestos containing material” were collected utilizing approved federal and state methods. When samples were collected, the locations were noted. Measurements were taken to determine the approximate quantity of suspect material. The condition of the material was also documented at that time.

All material samples were analyzed via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) as per EPA/600R- 93-116, July 1993.

The analytical results and locations for all samples collected can be found in Appendix A.

The samples were analyzed by International Asbestos Testing Laboratories of Mt. Laurel, New Jersey. IATL is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s “National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program” NVLAP (#1011500-0). IATL has developed and implemented an intra laboratory quality assurance/quality control program to ensure accuracy and consistency of results.

2.

Asbestos is present if the material analyzed is greater than one percent (>1.0%) by weight.

This stipulation is outlined in the EPA Publication EPA 500/5-85-024, Section 2.2.2.2.

V. INSPECTION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Asbestos containing materials have not been identified on the accessible areas of the structure.

Asbestos containing materials are categorized as containing asbestos concentrations greater than one percent (>1.0%) by weight. Asbestos fiber concentrations less than one percent (<1.0%) by weight are still regulated under OSHA standard 1926.1101.

Below are the results of the building inspection. The results indicate the sample location, sample numbers, material and condition. Some of the materials were homogenized for sampling purposes. For example, once a homogeneous material was sampled, the sample result could be considered representative for that material throughout the residence. If one sample of a homogeneous material tested positive for asbestos, then the entire homogeneous material was classified as asbestos containing in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency Guidelines.

The conditions of the materials are designated as good, damaged or significantly damaged.

The following materials were found to contain more than one percent (>1.0%) asbestos by weight:

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS WERE NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE ACCESSIBLE

AREAS OF THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 1610 ROSELYN AVENUE SCRANTON, PA.

Analytical results for the materials sampled are located in Appendix A.

Friable materials are materials that can be crushed by applying hand pressure. Non-friable materials are materials that typically cannot be crushed by hand pressure (floor tiles/mastics). If grinding or pulverization were to occur during demolition, non-friable materials can be rendered friable.

Asbestos containing materials (friable and non-friable) located on the interior / exterior of a building, which will be disturbed during renovations / demolition, must be removed and disposed of by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor.

VI. ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL ABATEMENT COSTS

As part of this report, cost estimates have been provided to help assist the Scranton Office of Economic and Community Development to evaluate the costs associated with a renovation or demolition project. The cost estimates have been arrived at independently and have been inserted in this report solely for the use of the Scranton Office of Economic and Community Development. The following estimate has been prepared for budgetary purposes. All measurements are approximate. Contractors should independently verify the quantities of materials when preparing a cost estimate for removal.

The following applies:

3.

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS WERE NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE ACCESSIBLE

AREAS OF THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 1610 ROSELYN AVENUE SCRANTON, PA.

VII. INSPECTION DISCLAIMER

Data and other information in this report are only valid for the prevailing conditions identified during this investigation and will be kept confidential. Any information contained in this report will not be released to third parties without the expressed written consent of the client except where required by law.

The conclusions expressed within this report are intended to advise the client of the potential regulated environmental hazards within the subject property. It is the responsibility of the client to comply with current regulations relating to the hazards identified in this report. The burden for financial or health consequences for action or lack of action taken by the client or the client's agent is the responsibility of the client.

4.

APPENDIX A

Approved by:

Approved Signatory Frank Ehrenfeld

Report for:

William Sterling Quad 3 Group 37 North Washington Street Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701

Regarding:

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC Project: 1610 Roselyn Ave - 13030.04.19

EML ID: 3645775

All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data for sample results with >1% asbestos concentration can be provided when requested.

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results. In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Asbestos PLM (Layer %): 05-17-2024

Service SOPs: Asbestos PLM (Layer %) (EPA 40CFR App E to Sub E of Part 763 & EPA METHOD 600/R-93-116, SOP EM-AS-S- 1267)

EMLab ID: 3645775, Page 1 of 2Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC 9000 Commerce Parkway, Suite B, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

(856) 231-9449 www.eurofinsus.com/Built Client: Quad 3 Group C/O: William Sterling Re: 1610 Roselyn Ave - 13030.04.19

Date of Receipt: 05-17-2024 Date of Report: 05-17-2024

Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Appx E Sub E 40 CFR 763 / EPA 600/R-93/116

Sample ID # Lab-ID version Sample Description Asbestos

Constituents Non-Asbestos Constituents Comment

001. Exterior Foundation 17853533-1

Layer 1 Gray Concrete Homogeneity:Good

Not Detected 100% Non-Fibrous Material

002. Exterior Foundation 17853534-1

Layer 1 Gray Concrete Homogeneity:Good

Not Detected 100% Non-Fibrous Material

Comments:

Analyst(s): Aidan Becker

EMLab ID: 3645775, Page 2 of 2Eurofins EPK Built Environment Testing, LLC

The total percentage of sample components shown may be greater than 100% when some components are detected at <1%.

The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified.

Inhomogeneous samples are separated into homogeneous subsamples and analyzed individually. ND means no fibers of that type were detected.

When detected, the minimum detection and reporting limit is less than 1% unless point counting is performed. Floor tile samples may contain large amounts of interference material and it is recommended that the sample be analyzed by gravimetric point count analysis to lower the detection limit and to aid in asbestos identification.

APPENDIX B

PHOTOS

APPENDIX C