4._Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_RFQ_-_Copy.pdf
PDF 38 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 15M50018QA4400013
About this file
4. Evaluation Factors for Award RFQ
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 15M50018QA4400013_-_0001.pdf | ||
| 3._Instructions_to_Offerors_-_Written_Proposals__Revised.pdf | ||
| AFD_Dog_Care_Services-_Florida_Questions.pdf | ||
| 15M50018QA4400013.pdf | ||
| 6._Past_Performance_Data_Worksheet.pdf | ||
| 3._Instructions_to_Offerors_-_Written_Proposals.pdf | ||
| 2._Additional_Clauses.pdf | ||
| 1._1449__continuation.pdf | ||
| 9._Contractor___Invoice.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 5._Offeror_Info_Page.pdf | ||
| 8._Pricing_Schedule_NFL.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 7._SOW.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(Attachment # 4)
REQUEST FOR QUOTE
DOG CARE SERVICES
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOLICITATION NO.: 15M50018QA4400013
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
1. EVALUATION PROCESS
The contract will be awarded to the responsible company whose proposal conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, based on the evaluation of Past Performance and Price.
Technical and Past performance are approximately equal to price.
2. PAST PERFORMANCE
(a) In investigating an Offeror’s performance, the Government may consider the information provided by the Contractor as well as information obtained from other sources, including past and present customers and their employees; other federal government agencies (including National Institutes of Health Contractor Performance System), state and local government agencies;
consumer protection organizations and better business bureaus; former subcontractors; and others who may have pertinent information.
(b) The offeror is required to provide a completed worksheet “Past Performance Data Worksheet”
(Attachment #6) for three (3) similar and relevant Federal Government or Commercial contracts worked on within the last three (3) years.
(c) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance, and will receive a neutral rating.
3. PRICE
Each price quote will be evaluated for reasonableness. Price reasonableness is a comparison of the proposed price with the prices proposed by other Offerors, the Government’s estimate, current prices for the same or similar services, current market conditions, as well as other relevant measures.
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
File details come from the government source that posted it.