Attachment 003_Amendment 001_ Questions and Answers for RFP15F06726R0000239_2026-07-31.pdf
PDF 557 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CIRG MESH Technology Program
- Solicitation number
- 15F06726R0000239
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers attachment (Amendment 001) to Request for Proposal 15F06726R0000239 for the Federal Bureau of Investigation's CIRG MESH Technology Program, posted to SAM.gov on July 31, 2026.
The Q&A clarifies that this solicitation is specifically for MPU5 radios and accessories only. Two questions addressed whether the FBI would consider technically acceptable alternatives were both answered in the negative. Question 1 asked if the FBI would evaluate an equal or equivalent alternative meeting or exceeding the throughput, range, and latency requirements of the MPU5; the answer confirmed that only MPU5 radios and accessories will be considered. Question 2 asked whether an alternate MANET system demonstrating cross-banding or gateway interoperability with Wave Relay MANET would be evaluated; this was similarly rejected as the contract scope is limited to MPU5 radios and accessories. Both answers reference the RFP Section C.2 Scope and direct offerors to the Justification and Authorization (J&A) document Sections 5 and 9 for additional context. The document notes that these Q&As are informational only and do not constitute changes to solicitation terms or conditions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Proposal (RFP) 15F06726R0000239
Persistent Systems Products and Accessories
CIRG MESH Technology Program
ATTACHMENT 3- QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
AMENDMENT 001
Posted to SAM.gov on July 31, 2026
The following questions and answers are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in the below questions and answers constitutes a change to the terms and conditions of the solicitation. Any change to a term or condition will be issued through an amendment to the solicitation.
Note: In some instances, questions have been abbreviated or additional context has been added to clearly describe the question for all potential Offerors. Any reference to a specific product or potential Offeror has been removed and made generic.
QUESTION 1:
Will the FBI consider an 'Equal or Equivalent' technically acceptable alternative that meets or exceeds the throughput, range, and latency requirements of the MPU5?
ANSWER 1:
No – In the RFP C.2 Scope it states this is a contract for MPU5 radios and accessories.
Please reference J&A document Sections 5 & 9
QUESTION 2:
If cross-banding or gateway interoperability is demonstrated between an alternate MANET system and Wave Relay MANET, will an alternate offer be evaluated?
ANSWER 2:
No – In the RFP C.2 Scope it states this is a contract for MPU5 radios and accessories.
Please reference J&A document Sections 5 & 9
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .