AE_IDIQ_PPQ_041318.docx

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by AE Offeror)

A. Contractor: __________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: ____________________________

C. Contract number: _________________________________

D. Contract type: ____________________________________

FBI Wide Architectural, Engineering and Planning Services Facilities & Finance Division Solicitation: 15F067-18-1200-R-0000016

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes

No

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $

H. Current/final contract cost: $

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by AE Offeror)

A. Customer or agency name: ______________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ______________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION (Sections 3,4 & 5 to be filled out by Client)

Name of Firm Evaluated

Name of person completing evaluation

Job title of person completing evaluation

Evaluator’s contact info – phone & e-mail

Evaluator’s Company (or Gov’t Entity) Name

Evaluator’s Company (or Gov’t Entity) City & State

Type of work Performed by Evaluated Firm (i.e.: investigation, design, construction inspection, etc.)

Brief description of the project:

Initial contract fee

Final amount paid

Was the initial fee reasonable?

Was the final fee, including all modifications, reasonable?

Year work began

Year work was completed

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

For the following questions, use this rating scale: Blue = Exceptional, Purple = Good, Green = Acceptable, Yellow = Marginal, Red = Unacceptable and N/A = Not applicable.

Definitions of Factors:

Exceptional – The firm demonstrates exceptional quality control measures in place and has delivered error and omission free design documents. The firm has delivered accurate construction cost estimates, exceptional customer service and works positively on integrated teams. One or more strengths exist. No deficiencies or weaknesses exist.

Good – The firm has good quality control measures in place and has delivered error and omission free design documents. The firm has delivered accurate construction cost estimates, good customer service and works positively on integrated teams.

Acceptable – The firm has acceptable quality control measures in place and has delivered design documents with occasional errors or omissions. The firm has delivered acceptable customer service. Weaknesses exist.

Marginal – The firm has marginal quality control measures in place and has delivered marginal design documents. The firm delivers marginal customer service. Weaknesses and/or deficiencies exist.

Unacceptable – The firm does not have quality control measures in place and routinely delivers design documents with errors and omissions. The firm’s customer service and teamwork is to an unacceptable level. Fails to meet minimum requirement.

Strength – Exceeded what was necessary to fulfill the contract Weakness – A known flaw that increased risk of unsuccessful performance Deficiency – A known failure that lead to unsuccessful performance to a marginal or unacceptable level.

Rate the quality of any draft or intermediate design submittals.

Rate the quality of the final construction issue submittal with regard to errors and omissions.

If questions arose regarding the firm’s work or if errors or omissions were found, after payment of the final invoice, how willing was the firm to answer those questions or correct those errors?

Were construction cost estimates prepared by this firm detailed and accurate?

If this firm produced a design, was the cost of the construction project kept within budget?

Did the firm meet the performance schedule?

Did this firm provide high quality customer relations and responsive service?

Did the firm and it’s employees work positively within the larger integrated project team (with the construction contractor and third-party consultants)?

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

SUBCONTRACTOR CONSENT:

We are currently participating as a (CIRCLE ONE) member of a joint venture, subcontractor, teaming partner, or key person with the prime contractor identified above in response to the referenced solicitation. We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to assess the most highly qualified firms for source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process, we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss our performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature)

(Name and Title)

Signature and title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company

Thank you for your prompt response!

Please return this completed questionnaire to Ms. Jennifer Robinson- Smith Email: JLROBINSON2@FBI.GOV