Section M of Solicitation_Amend 4.pdf
PDF 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Comprehensive Medical Services - FCI Sheridan
- Solicitation number
- 15BFA024R00000030
About this file
This document is an evaluation criteria section from a federal solicitation (15BFA024R00000030) for medical services at a Bureau of Prisons (BOP) institution. The Government intends to make a single award to an offeror whose proposal is determined to be in the best interest of the Government, with non-price factors (combined) approximately equal to price in the tradeoff process.
The evaluation employs three major criteria of equal value: Technical Criteria, Past Performance Criteria, and Price Criteria. Technical evaluation measures the demonstrated approach to providing an appropriate mix of resources for quality inmate medical care while mitigating Government costs and security risks, assessed through four equally-weighted subfactors: level of diversity of services proposed, driving distance and conditions to community-based providers, accreditation status of proposed facilities, and proposed enhancements to basic contract requirements that support the BOP's mission. Past Performance evaluation includes six equally-weighted subfactors: quality of services, relevancy, timeliness of deliverables/adherence to performance schedule, management, utilization of small business, and regulatory compliance. Price evaluation addresses eleven service categories in descending order of importance: Inpatient Facility Services, Outpatient Facility Services, Outpatient Physicians Services, Other Physician Services, Telehealth, Mobile MRI, Inpatient Physicians Services, Mobile CT, Optometrist, Tele-triage, and Oral Surgeon. A proportionate amount of points will be awarded to each offeror below the highest-ranked offeror in each pricing category.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
15BFA024R00000030 Page 46 of 46
The Government intends to make a single award to an offeror, pursuant to an affirmative determination of responsibility, whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be in the best interest of the Government, price and other factors considered. In this tradeoff process, non-price factors (when combined) are approximately equal to price.
Technical criteria and past performance are of equal value.
Evaluation criteria to be applied to proposals received in response to this solicitation are detailed below. Offerors are advised that should the offeror's proposals be considered approximately the same or equal under non-price factors, price could be paramount in the selection decision.
M.02.01 Technical Criteria
Demonstrated approach to providing an appropriate mix of resources to deliver quality medical care to the Inmates located at the institution, while mitigating the Government's costs and security risks, as measured by the following subfactors, which are of equal importance:
1. Level of diversity of services proposed;
2. Driving distance and conditions to and from the community-based providers;
3. Accreditation status of the proposed contract facility(ies);
4. Enhancements to the basic contract requirements proposed by the offeror which will facilitate institution’s ability to conform to the BOP’s stated mission.
M.02.02 Past Performance Criteria
Subfactors 1 through 6 are listed below and are of equal importance.
1. Quality of services
2. Relevancy
3. Timeliness of deliverables/Adherence to performance schedule
4. Management
5. Utilization of Small Business
6. Regulatory Compliance
M.02.03 Price Criteria
Pricing categories are listed below in descending order of importance.
1a. Inpatient Facility Scs:
1b. Outpatient Facility Svs:
2b. Outpatient Physicians Scs:
2d1. Other Physician 2c. Telehealth 2c4. Mobile MRI 2a. Inpatient Physicians Scs:
2c5. Mobile CT 2c2. Optometrist 2c1. Tele-triage 2c3. Oral Surgeon
A proportionate amount of points will be awarded to each offeror below the highest-ranked offeror in each category.
bop40728 Highlight
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .