Bridge_Inspection_Report_2021_Structure_8140-008S_0002.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- STABILIZE POINT BONITA LIGHTHOUSE TOWER
- Solicitation number
- 140P8625R0007
About this file
This is a Bridge Inspection Report for the Point Bonita Viaduct, a concrete slab bridge located in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area in California. The routine inspection was conducted on 8/30/2021 by the Federal Highway Administration's Federal Lands Bridge Office. The 39-foot-long structure, built in 1984, carries the Point Bonita Trail over a ravine and is currently in satisfactory condition, though several critical maintenance issues were identified.
The inspection report highlights significant site-related problems, including a local slope failure that has undermined the slope under the bridge and exposed one column at midspan. Other noted issues include severely corroded and failed drainage pipes, deteriorated paint on the railing, and moderate slope erosion. The recommended rehabilitation and reconstruction work, estimated at $351,000, includes filling and stabilizing slopes, replacing the drainage system, and repainting the railing. The priority of improvement is classified as "C" (Moderate), indicating the structure requires substantial repairs to prevent more serious deficiencies.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
POINT BONITA VIADUCT
POINT BONITA TRAIL OVER RAVINE
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 8140-008S
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 8/30/2021
SD
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8140-008S
POINT BONITA VIADUCT INSPECTION DATE: 08/30/2021
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
01 - SLAB
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
0 - NONE
1 - SILL
1 - CONCRETE
UNKNOWN
6 - RESTRICTED
2004-RAILING PAINTED.
2015-APPROACHES REPAVED
NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .
MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
DECK WIDTH:
CURB TO CURB WIDTH:
YEAR BUILT:
YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .
SKEW ANGLE:
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
39.0 FT (11.9 M)
19.5 FT (5.9 M)
12.7 FT (3.9 M)
12.0 FT (3.7 M)
0 °
N
LOCATION
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: .. .00 (KM PT 0)
STATE: .............................. 069 - CALIFORNIA LOCATION: .... Point Bonita Trail. FP key required for gate at trailhead.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... POINT BONITA TRAIL
FEATURE INTERSECTED: RAVINE
INSPECTION TEAM: B. Kamrath, S. Marks
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Beau Kamrath
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 11/02/2021
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete slab bridge is in satisfactory condition. The main problems are site-related, and include a local slope failure that has undermined the slope under the bridge and south side of the west approach roadway. Erosion under the bridge has exposed one column under the slab at midspan. The condition of the slopes and column will continue to be monitored until repairs can be made.
Other problems include severely corroded and failed drainage pipes carrying runoff down the slope and deteriorated paint on the railing.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 8140-008S
POINT BONITA VIADUCT INSPECTION DATE : 08/30/2021
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C
Item No.
Maintenance Recomendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.6
TRIM SHRUBS BACK AND REPAINT RAILING ALONG
SOUTH EDGE. 1 LS 1000 1000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 1000
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.17, 223.4
FILL AND STABILIZE SLOPE AT APPROACHES
AND UNDER BRIDGE. 1 LS 100000 100000
58.7 REPLACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM UNDER BRIDGE
AND APPROACH. 1 LS 50000 50000
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS 200000 200000
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 350000
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8140-008S
POINT BONITA VIADUCT INSPECTION DATE: 08/29/2021
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
G
G
G
F
P
G
N
N
N
G
N
N
N
N
N
G
G
N
N
N
N
F
G
F
N
F
P
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS N
3. WEARING SURFACE N
N FT
DRAINAGE
G
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS N
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS N
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS N
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION N
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
N
N
N
N
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
N
G
F
F
G
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS 11 - PILES-BURIED
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8140-008S
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1
59.3
CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SLAB SPANS OLD SLOPE FAILURE. SLAB APPEARS TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION; MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON SOUTH FACE NEAR MIDSPAN. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
58.5 MINOR SHRINKAGE CRACKS IN CURB.
58.6 RAILING WAS REPAINTED IN 2004; MINOR (PREVIOUSLY NOTED AS MODERATE) PAINT DETERIORATION ON POSTS AND RUB RAIL. HEAVY PAINT DETERIORATION ON TOP RAIL AT EAST END. MODERATE CHECKING (1/8"W) THROUGHOUT RAILING TIMBER.
LARGE SHRUB GROWS AGAINST EAST END OF RAILING.
58.7
222.9
CATCH DRAIN IN WEST APPROACH; SEVERE RUSTING OF DRAINAGE PIPE AT DOWNHILL SIDE. SEVERE RUSTING OF ADDITIONAL STEEL DRAINAGE PIPE PROTRUDING FROM UNDER STRUCTURE AT DOWNHILL SIDE. DEBRIS AND SAND BUILD-UP ALONG
SOUTH EDGE OF DECK.
60.16 MINOR (PREVIOUSLY NOTED AS SEVERE) HONEYCOMBING (1/2"D) OF CONCRETE COLUMN AT MID-HEIGHT. COLUMN DOES NOT
APPEAR TO PROVIDE SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURAL SUPPORT.
60.17 MODERATE SLOPE EROSION, 10'L X 32"W X 3.5'H (PREVIOUSLY 3'H), HAS EXPOSED ONE CONCRETE COLUMN UNDER CAP AT
MIDSPAN.
222.3 PREVIOUSLY NOTED MODERATE DECAY (3"D) OF FIRST RAIL POST FROM STRUCTURE AT WEST APPROACH NOT OBSERVED AT
TIME OF INSPECTION.
222.5 SEVERE EROSION ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST APPROACH AND STRUCTURE. SLOPE FAILURE IS WITHIN 1' OF WEST APPROACH PAVEMENT. THREE BARRICADES PREVIOUSLY PLACED ALONG WALKWAY HAVE FALLEN ONTO SLOPE.
222.8 CURVE AT EAST APPROACH.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8140-008S
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............POINT BONITA VIADUCT
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........8140-008 S
6 - PACIFIC WEST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 6 - RESTRICTED
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... UNKNOWN
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
069 - CALIFORNIA
01041 CRENSHAW
00000
1 6 0 00000 0
RAVINE
POINT BONITA TRAIL
8140008S0000000
Point Bonita Trail. FP key required for gate at trailhead.
6 00 FT ( 1 83 M)
.00 (KM PT: 0 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 01 - SLAB (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............002 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............19.5 FT ( 5.9 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 39.0 FT ( 11.9 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 1 - SILL C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. R - POSTED FOR OTHER LOAD-
CAPACITY RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING:.............. TONS ( 0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL
LOADS
(64) OPERATING RATING:.............. TONS ( 0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 08/30/3021 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
https://LENGTH:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8140-008S
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 37° 49'13 00" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................122°31 '48 20" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 12.7 FT ( 3.9 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 199 MI ( 199 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................3 - PEDESTRIAN-BICYCLE RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 0 - OTHER (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............0 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2008 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................0 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 12 FT ( 3.7 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2028 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
WATERWAY (BRIDGE PERMIT NOT
REQUIRED)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 7 - T MBER
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3.67 FT ( 1.12 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................N (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:........... N
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 5 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... N - NOT OVER WATERWAY
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: N N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 1000
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 350000
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2004-RAILING PAINTED.
2015-APPROACHES REPAVED
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
FP KEY REQUIRED FOR GATE AT TRAILHEAD.
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
Inspector: Beau Kamrath Structure Number: 8140008S0000000
Inpsection Date: 08/30/2021 Facility Carried: POINT BONITA TRAIL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING WEST TOWARD LIGHTHOUSE
PHOTO 4
Description SOUTH (DOWNHILL) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF DECK
PHOTO 8
Description ACCUMULATION OF DIRT AND DEBRIS ALONG SOUTH CURB
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL CONDITION OF TIMBER RAIL
PHOTO 10
Description EAST END OF SOUTH RAIL; NOTE PAINT LOSS AND TREE GROWTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TOP OF SOUTH TIMBER RAIL; NOTE LOSS OF PAINT AND CHECKING OF TIMBER
PHOTO 12
Description UNDERSIDE OF TRANSVERSE BEAM; NOTE EXPOSED DRILLED SHAFT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description EXPOSED DRILLED SHAFT BENEATH TRANSVERSE BEAM
PHOTO 14
Description WEST APPROACH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description EAST APPROACH
PHOTO 16
Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPHILL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNHILL
PHOTO 18
Description FAILED DRAINAGE PIPE NEAR WEST ABUTMENT ON DOWNHILL SIDE; NOTE BARRICADE
FALLEN ONTO SLOPE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description DRAIN PIPE CLOGGED UP TO 80% NEAR SOUTH SIDE OF EAST SPAN
PHOTO 20
Description FAILED STEEL DRAINAGE PIPE APPROXIMATELY 15' FROM BRIDGE ON DOWNHILL SIDE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .