Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire - 1 Page.doc
DOC document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P6019R0019
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluating contractor performance on federal contracts. The one-page questionnaire includes nine rating scale questions on completion of work within schedule, adherence to plans and specifications, quality of workmanship, supervision, communication and coordination, and equitable adjustments to changed requirements. Space is also provided for additional comments.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation to rehabilitate the ranch house and terrace walls at TAPR, issued by the National Park Service Midwest Region. Details include the solicitation number, project name, opportunity type, describing agency, and general work requirements but no further information on response dates, award dates, pricing terms, or other contract details.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Date____________________ Contractor Name _____________________________ Project Title/Description___________________________________
Contract Type [ ] RFQ [ ] Sealed Bid [ ] Fixed Price [ ] Negotiated
Contract Period ________________________ Cost Original ________________ Current/Final ________________
1. Was the project completed within the allotted time? [ ] Yes [ ] No
2. How effective was the contractor with establishment
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A and execution of the schedule?
3. Contractor’s adherence to plans and specifications
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
4. Submission of documents and reports (submittals)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
5. Standards of workmanship/quality
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
6. Completion of final punch-list
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
7. Supervision
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
8. Communication, coordination and cooperation (CO, COTR, etc.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A
9. Was the contractor fair/reasonable regarding equitable
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 N/A adjustments and cost proposals in response to changed work requirements?
OTHER COMMENTS
Interviewed by:__________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .