B09_Questions_Answers_Document_0002.pdf
PDF 80 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RESURFACE GRAND AVENUE Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5422R0017
About this file
This document includes questions and answers related to a solicitation seeking approximately 12,000 cubic yards of fill material for resurfacing Grand Avenue at Cumberland Island National Seashore. The material must meet specifications for material classification and gradation listed in the Statement of Work, resembling the dredge material likely from the intracoastal waterway/St Marys River/Kings Bay area used in previous resurfacing. Acceptable options for the fill material include limestone screenings if meeting specifications, but not fine sand unless also meeting specifications. The contractor must provide all equipment to transport the material from the delivery location to the final stockpile area in Racoon Keys, accessible by truck from the southern end of the island.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5422R0017_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5422R0017_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| a04_Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5422R0017.pdf | ||
| B03_SOL_WAGE_RATES.pdf | ||
| A06_Aerial_Photo_-_Fill_Site.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions/ Answers
1. Is the material a limestone screening product, fill sand, or some other type of fill material? Do you know who may have supplied the material last time it was put down on the island?
The material is dredge material and not from a supplier. It is probably from the intracoastal waterway/St Marys River/Kings Bay area that took place many decades ago.
The material is from a dredging operation for deepening or widening of the waterway, as it contains some shell fragments and is compactable (not just sand or fine silt).
The material must be compactable and look similar to the current material to maintain the historic character of the road. So it must be similar to the requirements for material classification and gradation information in the SOW.
2. Are there any logistics we can use at the delivery location to upload the sand and haul it to the stockpiles?
The contractor is to provide all equipment to move fill material from the delivery location to the final stockpile location.
3. Does it have to be “grey sand”? Are limestone screenings or fine sand acceptable?
The material does not have to be grey sand. We don't want the "fine sand" product unless it meets the requirements for material classification and gradation listed in the SOW.The limestone screenings is a better option as long as it meets the material classification and gradation listed in the SOW. The current material that was used on site has the material classification and gradation listed in the SOW. It is probably from the intracoastal waterway/St Marys River/Kings Bay area that took place many decades ago. The material is from a dredging operation for deepening or widening of the waterway, as it contains some shell fragments and is compactable (not just sand or fine silt).The material must be compactable and look similar to the current material to maintain the historic character of the road.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .