Forms_2_through_6.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 96 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NTCRA at former waste dump, Kings Canyon NP, CA
- Solicitation number
- 140P2124R0002
About this file
This document contains forms and templates related to a solicitation for a non-time critical removal action at a former waste dump site located in Kings Canyon National Park, California. The solicitation is being conducted by the Department of the Interior National Park Service under number 140P2124R0002. Key requirements include excavating and disposing of contaminated soil, conducting confirmation sampling, and restoring the site. Offerors must submit pricing for base line items including contract support, non-removal site activities, excavating approximately 10,000 tons of soil, and sampling. There are also multiple options for additional soil disposal, sampling, and restoration activities. The solicitation is set aside for Indian Small Business Economic Enterprises and includes provisions limiting subcontracting to meet the 85% threshold required for this socioeconomic category.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
2. price schedule Form 2: Price Schedule Offerors are required to submit, at minimum, an offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for base items and all option line items. Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of an error in the calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of an error in summation, the total of the corrected amounts governs. Round totals and extended prices to whole dollars. Complete this page and return with other documents described in Section L.
| CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE | |||
| All work shall be performed in accordance with the attached Statement of Work, referenced documents, and wage determination. Refer to Attachment 1 for line item definitions. | |||
| *Unit-priced CLINs show an estimated quantity; see Paragraph H.8. | |||
| Contract Line Item | Quantity* and Unit | Unit Price | Price |
| 1: Contract support tasks | 1 lump sum | -- | $0.00 |
| 2: Non-removal site activities | 1 lump sum | -- | $0.00 |
| 3: Excavate soil | 9,988 tons | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 4: Sampling | 1 lump sum | -- | $0.00 |
| TOTAL PRICE FOR BASE ITEMS 1 through 4: | $0.00 | ||
| The Government reserves the right to unilaterally award any or no options at or after time of award. See Paragraphs H.7 and M.1 C for details. | |||
| Option A – Purchase, import, and place clean soil (ordered in 10-CY increments). May be exercised multiple times. | cubic yard | $0.00 | -- |
| Option B – Load, transport, and place clean NPS-furnished soil (ordered in 10-CY increments). May be exercised multiple times. | cubic yard | $0.00 | -- |
| Option C – Additional soil confirmation samples. May be exercised multiple times in increments of one (1). | each | $0.00 | -- |
| Option D – Biobased hydraulic fluid in earth-moving equipment. Option is per piece of equipment; combine all machines listed in Form 2 into one LS price here. | $0.00 | ||
| Option E - Transport and dispose of soil and debris at RCRA Class II landfill | 9,988 tons | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Option F - Transport and dispose of soil and debris at RCRA Class I landfill | ton | $0.00 | -- |
| Option G - Transport and dispose of non-hazardous soil and debris at an appropriate landfill | ton | $0.00 | -- |
RFP 140P2124R0002
3. additional price details
| Form 3: Additional Price Details | |||||
| CLIN | Quantity | Unit | Unit Price | CLIN Price | |
| 1 | Contract support tasks | LS | $0.00 | ||
| Project meetings and conference calls, develop and update project schedule | 1 | LS | |||
| Develop plans: Site Health and Safety Plan (SHASP), Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP), Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Erosion Control Plan (ECP), and Traffic Control Plan (TCP) | 1 | LS | |||
| Prepare Response Action Completion Reports (RACR) and Response Action Completion Report Fact Sheets | 1 | LS | |||
| General contract administration and project oversight (do not include removal action site superintendent in this line) | 1 | LS | |||
| 2 | Mobilization, non-removal site activities, and demobilization | LS | $0.00 | ||
| Mobilization | 1 | LS | |||
| Implement, maintain, and remove erosion/stormwater and traffic controls | 1 | LS | |||
| Clearing and grubbing | 1 | LS | |||
| Dust monitoring and control | 1 | LS | |||
| Load, transport and place NPS-furnished soil (~7,400 cubic yards) | 1 | LS | |||
| Contour and restore site | 1 | LS | |||
| Demobilization | 1 | LS | |||
| 3 | Excavate soil (estimated quantity) | 9,988 | TN | $0.00 | |
| 4 | Sampling | LS | $0.00 | ||
| Waste characterization | 1 | LS | |||
| Confirmation sampling | 1 | LS | |||
| TOTAL 1 - 4 | $0.00 |
| OPTION A | Purchase, import, and place clean soil (ordered in 10-CY increments) | |||
| Purchase clean soil | unknown | CY | ||
| Transport, place, and contour imported soil | unknown | CY | ||
| OPTION B | Load, transport and place NPS-furnished soil (ordered in 10-CY increments) | |||
| Load, transport, place, and contour NPS-furnished soil. | unknown | CY | ||
| OPTION C | Additional soil confirmation samples (each) | 1 | EA | |
| Includes labor to collect and process the samples plus appropriate lab analyses. | ||||
| OPTION D | Biobased hydraulic fluid in earth-moving equipment | |||
| [List specific equipment and associated price.] | 1 | LS | ||
| [List specific equipment and associated price.] | 1 | LS | ||
| [List specific equipment and associated price.] | 1 | LS | ||
| OPTION E | Transport and dispose of soil and debris at RCRA Class II landfill (estimated quantity) | 9,988 | TN | $0.00 |
| OPTION F | Transport and dispose of soil and debris at RCRA Class I landfill | unknown | TN | |
| OPTION G | Transport and dispose of non-hazardous soil and debris at an appropriate landfill | unknown | TN |
&"-,Bold"FORM 3: Additional Price Details for RFP #140P2124R0002 (will be the basis for post-award Schedule of Values).
Page &P
4. experience summary
| Form 4: Relevant Experience - Comparability to current project | #1 | #2 | #3 | #4 | #5 | #6 | #7 |
| Project Title (with location) | |||||||
| Client (eg name of federal or state agency, city, private) | |||||||
| Area of Comparability: | Instructions: Enter an X in the project's column if it included the listed area of comparability; leave blank if not relevant. | ||||||
| Preparation of CERCLA documents, e.g. Site Health and Safety Plan (SHASP), Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) | |||||||
| Preparation of planning documents, e.g. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), Erosion Control Plan (ECP), and/or Traffic Control Plan (TCP) | |||||||
| CERCLA Removal Action with similar contaminants. | |||||||
| CERCLA Removal Action with similar affected media. | |||||||
| CERCLA Removal Action at former landfill site. | |||||||
| CERCLA Removal Action at site with migration pathways from impacted soils to surface water, sediment, and groundwater. | |||||||
| Removal Action conducted under different regulatory framework. | |||||||
| Performed in logistically challenging environment with limited services, such as electricity, cell phone coverage, grocery or hardware store, etc. | |||||||
| Performed in public, highly visible location. | |||||||
| CERCLA waste characterization for landfill acceptance. | |||||||
| Transportation and disposal of RCRA, non-RCRA, and/or non-hazardous soil. | |||||||
| ISM confirmation sampling at CERCLA Removal Action site. | |||||||
| Interpretation of ISM results at CERCLA Removal Action site. | |||||||
| Preparation of a human health and ecological risk assessment technical memo that presents calculated exposure point concentration(s) over defined exposure area(s) based on confirmation ISM sample data. | |||||||
| Backfill and site restoration activities of comparable magnitude. | |||||||
| Preparation of CERCLA Response Action Completion Report (RACR). |
5. key personnel
| Form 5: Key Personnel Qualifications and Experience | Instructions: Enter a Y if the nominated person meets the minimum standards, an N if they don't meet them, and an E if they exceed them. Supporting information must be elsewhere in the proposal. Criteria are color-coded to position. | |||
| Environmental Professional | Human Health Risk Assessor | Ecological Risk Assessor | Regulatory Specialist | |
| Person's name: | ||||
| Total number of years of relevant experience: | ||||
| Professional Engineer’s license in California or | ||||
| Professional Geologist’s license in California, and | ||||
| Equivalent of 15 years of fulltime relevant experience | ||||
| Explanatory comments: | ||||
| Master’s degree in biological sciences or toxicology, | ||||
| Minimum 15 years of working experience in developing human health risk assessment data quality objectives, sampling design for human health risk assessment data needs, development of site-specific exposure parameters, conducting human health risk assessments, and the identification of uncertainties, including the applicability of toxicology studies. Consulting experience preferred. | ||||
| Demonstrated 15 years of working experience: | ||||
| Conducting Hazard Identification, | ||||
| Conducting Dose-Response Assessments, | ||||
| Conducting Exposure Assessments, | ||||
| Cconducting Human Health Risk Characterization, | ||||
| Developing Preliminary Remedial/Removal Goals, | ||||
| Working knowledge of EPA risk assessment guidance and databases, | ||||
| Working knowledge of statistics, including development of statistically based sampling designs, use of Incremental Sampling Methodology (ITRC 2020 or latest) and associated statistics and decision mechanisms, | ||||
| Working knowledge of state and federal regulatory frameworks (RCRA, CERCLA, NEPA, NRDA, etc.), | ||||
| Experience with water quality issues and soil / sediment contamination | ||||
| Non-mandatory qualification: Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology (DABT) that has 15 years of experience working with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. | ||||
| Explanatory comments: | ||||
| Master’s degree in biological sciences or toxicology, | ||||
| Minimum 15 years of working experience in developing ecological risk assessment data quality objectives (DQOs), sampling design for ecological risk assessment data needs, development of site-specific exposure parameters for local ecological receptors, conducting ecological risk assessments, and the identification of uncertainties, including the applicability of toxicology studies. Consulting experience preferred. | ||||
| Demonstrated 15 years of working experience: | ||||
| Conducting Ecological Risk Characterization, | ||||
| Developing Preliminary Remedial/Removal Goals, | ||||
| Working knowledge of statistics, including development of statistically based sampling designs, use of Incremental Sampling Methodology (ITRC 2012 or latest) and associated statistics and decision mechanisms, | ||||
| Working knowledge of EPA risk assessment guidance and databases, | ||||
| Working knowledge of state and federal regulatory frameworks (RCRA, CERCLA, NEPA, NRDA, etc.), | ||||
| Experience with water quality issues and soil / sediment contamination | ||||
| Non-mandatory qualification: Diplomate of the American Board of Toxicology (DABT) that has 15 years of experience working with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. | ||||
| Explanatory comments: | ||||
| Bachelor’s degree in environmental science, Biology, Chemistry, or another relevant field. | ||||
| In-depth knowledge of environmental requirements under federal regulations (RCRA, CERCLA, CWA, and CAA) and state regulations (especially for state in which the Site is located), | ||||
| Documented experience analyzing, interpreting, and applying environmental regulations, including ARARs, for a variety of Site types for a minimum of 15 years, | ||||
| Non-mandatory qualification: Has juris doctor (J.D.) degree and has worked with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act in the ways described in the SOW. | ||||
| Explanatory comments: |
140P2124R0002
6 limitations on subcontracting Report on Limitations on Subcontracting [based on DSC template 7/25/19]
| This report is required for small business, 8(a) or other socio-economic set-aside service contracts (including construction) to demonstrate compliance with limitations on subcontracting as implemented by DOI policy. | |
| Solicitation Number: | 140P2124R0002 |
| Prime Contractor: | |
| Total Offered Price | |
| Type of Set Aside and implementing clauses: | Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise per 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (OCT 2022) (DEVIATION OCT 2022) and 1452.280-3, Indian Economic Enterprise Subcontracting Limitations. |
| Type of Service and Required Participation: | General construction; 85% threshold applies (see clause excerpt below). |
| Participartion Calculation | |||
| Amounts shown below shall represent offerered prices. | |||
| 1) Total offered price from the Prime Contractor for contract performance: | $0 | ||
| 2) Total amount projected to be paid to all Similarly Situated* Subcontractors (SSS, in this case INDIAN SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMIC ENTERPRISE (ISBEE)), as measured by <1,000 employees, the standard for NAICS 562910 Exception), excluding the cost of materials | $0 | ||
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert SSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert SSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert SSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert SSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert SSS company name] | $0 | Add rows if more than 5 SSS |
| 3) Total amount to be paid to all Non-Similarly Situated Subcontractors (NSS), excluding the cost of materials | $0 | ||
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert NSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert NSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert NSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert NSS company name] | $0 | |
| Amount to be paid to: | [Insert NSS company name] | $0 | Add rows if more than 5 NSS |
| 4) Prime & SSS Participation % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | Modify formula if rows added above | |
| 5) NSS Participation % | ERROR:#DIV/0! | Modify formula if rows added above |
| FAR 52.219-14 (OCT 2022) (DEVIATION OCT 2022) excerpt: (e) Limitations on subcontracting. By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Contractor agrees that in performance of a contract assigned a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for—(3) General construction, it will not pay more than 85 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor's 85 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded; ... |
| * Similarly situated entity, as used in this clause, means a first-tier subcontractor, including an independent contractor, that— |
(1) Has the same small business program status as that which qualified the prime contractor for the award (e.g., for a small business set-aside contract, any small business concern, without regard to its socioeconomic status); and
(2) Is considered small for the size standard under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code the prime contractor assigned to the subcontract.
| Prepared by: | |
| Name and Title |
Prepared on:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .