B08_Attach_Project_Experience_0001.docx
DOCX document 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P2026R0066
About this file
This is a Project Experience Questionnaire template designed for offerors responding to solicitation 140P2026R0066, a Department of the Interior National Park Service construction project for bike path and roadway improvements at West Bluff Trailhead. The questionnaire requires offerors to document relevant past project experience that demonstrates capability to execute the proposed work, with responses evaluated under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor outlined in solicitation section L.
The template requires offerors to provide detailed information on referenced projects, including project title, location, description, owner, and point of contact. Offerors must list all contractors (prime and subcontractors) whose experience is being submitted, documenting their roles, trade specialties, contract prices (original and final), and performance periods (original and final calendar days). The questionnaire contains seven substantive questions requiring offerors to describe project work performed, identify alignment with specific Project Experience elements from the solicitation, explain any cost and schedule variances with supporting rationale, describe problems encountered and resolutions implemented, discuss successful means and methods with recommendations for the proposed project, and provide any additional relevant project information. Offerors are instructed to limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes specified in the solicitation and may expand response sections or add pages as needed to adequately address each question.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2026R0066
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .