B08__Past_Performance_Questionnaire_0003.docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
CAVE 332397 ¿ Replace Main Distribution System Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P2026R0007
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service National Office

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation 140P2026R0007 (CAVE 332397), a National Park Service project to replace the main distribution system. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's past performance across multiple assessment areas including quality, schedule management, cost control, project management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. The reference is requested to complete detailed ratings ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional, with specific evaluation criteria for each performance category.

Key administrative details include a return deadline of January 07, 2026 at 2:00 pm Mountain Time, with Contracting Officer Edwin Berry and Contract Specialist Brian Baugh from the National Park Service - Denver Service Center as the primary contacts. The solicitation involves replacing distribution system components to protect the park's primary cavern resources, with the contract type anticipated to be Firm Fixed Price, Time & Materials, or Cost Reimbursable. The questionnaire emphasizes that the provided information is considered Source Selection Sensitive and includes strict guidelines about how the performance evaluation can be used or referenced.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CAVE 332397 ¿ Replace Main Distribution System, newest first.
File Type Posted
B08_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_Proposal_Submission_Section_L_0006.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0007_Amd_0006.pdf PDF
B08_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_Propsoal_Submission_Section_L_0006.pdf PDF
CAVE_332397_-_Caverns_Historic_District_0005.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0007_Amd_0005.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0007_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
QA_12_29_25_-_NPS_Responses_20251230_(002)_0004.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0007_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
B11_Pre-Bid_Proposal_Conference_Site_Visit_signed_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0007_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Park_map_0002.pdf PDF
Pre_Bid_Location_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0007_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_6b_2022_CAVE_Geophysical_Investigative_Report.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_9_Contract_Price_Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sol_140P2026R0007.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_6d_2022_CAVE_Geophysical_Investigative_Report.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_10_LmtOnSubconRpt_REQD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Section_J_Attachment_6c_2022_CAVE_Geophysical_Investigative_Report.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_6a_2022_CAVE_Geophysical_Investigative_Report.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_4_CAVE_332397_Specifications.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_2_CAVE_313146___317759-Specifications.pdf PDF
B08_Solit_Clauses_Construction_11_6_25.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_1_CAVE_313146__317759_-_Construction_Drawings_7-31-25.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_5_2020_Carlsbad_Caverns_Electrical_Resistivity_and_GPR.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_7_Hydrant_Test_Report_Form.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_8_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Section_J_Attachment_3_CAVE_332397_Construction_Drawings_7-30-25.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation: 140P2026R0007 – CAVE 332397 INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist listed in Section E.

NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
Unique Entity ID Number
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of exceptional, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of exceptional, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of exceptional, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors?
Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of exceptional, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of exceptional, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by
2:00 pm Mountain Time (MT) on January 07, 2026; unless otherwise extended.
Names
Edwin Berry & Brian Baugh
Titles
Contracting Officer & Contract Specialist
Organization
National Park Service – Denver Service Center
Email
edwin_berry@nps.gov & brian_baugh@contractor.nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .