B09_JELA_SiteVisit_9-28-22_0002.pptx

Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve Shoreline Protection

Preproposal Conference - Virtual Site Visit

Jean Lafitte National Historical Park and Preserve Jefferson Parish, Louisiana Shoreline Protection

Solicitation: 140P2022R0069

NPS PMIS #: JELA 251674

THIS MEETING WILL BE RECORDED

September 28, 2022 E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A

OPENING

INTRODUCTIONS

ATTENDEES - LIST WILL BE INCLUDED IN AN AMENDMENT

SOLICITATION OVERVIEW

PROJECT OVERVIEW

REVIEW OF PLANS

Q&A

CLOSING

DSC: PM– Tomas Maclosky, Acquisitions – Damon Griffin (CS) and Shellie Murphy (CO) JELA: Guy Hughes, South Atlantic Region: Dusty Pate

Solicitation Overview Solicitation: 140P2022R0069

Proposals due: 10/11/2022, 1200 MDT

Questions due: 10/4/2022, 1400 MDT Submit through email to:

Contracting Officer, Shellie Murphy, shellie_murphy@nps.gov Contract Specialist, Zaira Lupidi, zaira_lupidi@nps.gov

Basis for Award

Evaluation Factors

Solicitation Overview Cont.

Report on Limitation on Subcontracting Worksheet

Schedule of Values (SOV)

QUESTIONS AFTER PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

DIRECT ALL QUESTIONS TO: Shellie Murphy and Zaira Lupidi, BY E-MAIL: shellie_murphy@nps.gov; zaira_lupidi@nps.gov.

ALL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS BY AMENDMENT TO THE SOLICITATION.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (SOLICITATION DOCUMENT) SHALL ONLY BE CHANGED BY FORMAL AMENDMENT ISSUED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER AT THE WEBSITE sam.gov.

CUT OFF DAY FOR QUESTIONS IS October 4, 2022, 1400 MDT.

BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government will conduct a source selection using the Best Value Continuum Tradeoff Process defined at FAR Part 15.1. The Contracting Officer (CO) is the Source Selection Authority (SSA).

The offerors proposal are evaluated for conformance to the solicitation requirements;

Must be determined fair and reasonable; and Provides the best value to the government considering all evaluation factors.

Section L provides contractors specific instructions regarding the contents of their proposal.

Section M provides contractors details on how their proposal is evaluated.

The Government may accept other than the lowest priced proposal when the perceived benefits of a higher priced proposal merit the price differential.

BASIS FOR AWARD

Additionally, pursuant to FAR 52.215-1(f), Contract Award, contained herein:

The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government’s interest.

The Government may waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)).

Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the CO later determines them to be necessary.

EVALUATION FACTORS

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE:

Technical: Factors 1 – 6 are in descending order of importance.

Past Performance (Factor 7): Technical Factors 1-6 when combined are significantly more important than past performance.

Overall: Technical and past performance when combined are significantly more important than Price (Factor 8).

VOLUME I: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – FORMAT, ORGANIZATION, CONTENTS

FORMAT: Submit (1) one electronic copy.

ORGANIZATION: Include folders and files for electronic formats named as follows

PAST PERFORMANCE

Submit Past Performance information for the same projects submitted under Project Experience (Factor #4) using the attached Past Performance Questionnaire.

Subcontractor past performance will only be considered if it correlates to the work the subcontractor will be performing on this requirement.

If available, offerors may submit a Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) evaluation report in lieu of the Past Performance Questionnaire.

Submittal process for the Past Performance Questionnaire is as follows:

NOTE: RFP states Factor 5. Correct through amendment.

PAST PERFORMANCE

Complete Sections I and II only of the attached Past Performance Questionnaire and forward to your client reference.

The reference shall be some who was substantially involved with the project and can provide a complete, objective assessment of your performance.

Direct them to complete and submit the survey to the address and point of contact in paragraph B above by the due date and time of proposal receipt.

Submit copies of the questionnaire that your forwarded to your references with their point of contact information in this proposal Volume I.

Past performance on contracts with the Federal Government, other public agencies, or private organizations will be considered.

During proposal evaluations, exchanges between the Government and offerors may occur to clarify the relevance of past performance information.

Submit a narrative disclosing any instances of past performance that may be considered less than full satisfactory. Describe pertinent facts, circumstances and any remedial action taken or to be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to disclose such instances could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record.

NOTE: “paragraph B” refers to the CO and CS.

Evaluation of Options Except when it is determined not to be in the Government’s best interests, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Intent is to award all CLINS evaluation will follow this intent;

VOLUME II, BUSINESS AND PRICE PROPOSAL – Submittals in Vol II will not be rated Standard Form (SF)1442 will be reviewed for completeness.

Amendment Acknowledgements will be reviewed for timely and proper acknowledgement.

FACTOR 8: PRICE (SECTION B PRICE SCHEDULE – PRICE PROPOSAL)

Proposed pricing will be evaluated for fair and reasonableness.

Submit (1) one electronic copy. No hard copies shall be submitted.

Reasonableness will be determined considering comparisons to competitive pricing and to the independent Government estimate (IGE). Proposed pricing that differs significantly from the competition or IGE may be reviewed to assess potential performance risk and the offeror’s understanding of contract requirements. If multiple contract line items are included in the price schedule, prices will be evaluated to determine whether any line items are unbalanced. Offerors are cautioned to distribute costs appropriately.

NOTE: Section L uses the red language for Factor 7, Section M uses the black. Also, Section L lists Factor 7 third, Section M lists it first.

VOLUME II, BUSINESS AND PRICE PROPOSAL (continued) SF 24 BID BOND: The Standard Form 24, Bid Bond will be reviewed for completeness and acceptability.

SECTION K REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS: Information will be reviewed for completeness and award eligibility.

GENERAL REFERENCES: Points of contact will be queried to determine Responsibility pursuant to FAR 9.103.

SUBCONTRACTING PERCENTAGE WORKSHEET (SET-ASIDE): will be reviewed for completeness and correlation to proposed pricing.

Contract Price Schedule Summary

See Section B

Project Overview and Review of Plans PM Tom Maclosky

Dusty

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

DIRECT ALL QUESTIONS TO: Shellie Murphy and Zaira Lupidi, BY E-MAIL: shellie_murphy@nps.gov; zaira_lupidi@nps.gov.

ALL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS BY AMENDMENT TO THE SOLICITATION.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (SOLICITATION DOCUMENT) SHALL ONLY BE CHANGED BY FORMAL AMENDMENT ISSUED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER AT THE WEBSITE sam.gov.

CUT OFF DAY FOR QUESTIONS IS October 4, 2022, 1400 MDT.

Suggest handling all questions in writing; however, this slide can be modified to be for open Q&A. We will have to document each question and answer for distribution.

Thank You For Your Interest in This Project E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior image3.emf image2.jpeg image4.png image5.png image6.png image1.jpeg