140P2022R0048-Amd_1_0001.pdf
PDF 429 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CUVA 224822 Stabilize Cuyahoga Riverbank at High
- Solicitation number
- 140P2022R0048
About this file
This document provides an amendment to a solicitation for riverbank stabilization along the Cuyahoga River in Cuyahoga Valley National Park. The project involves stabilizing eight sites along the riverbank and towpath trail using a design-build approach. The National Park Service is seeking responses by June 8, 2022. The amendment answers four questions about the submission requirements, including clarifying that letters of commitment should be included with Factor 1 and are excluded from page limits. It also provides a corrected past performance questionnaire with the proper point of contact and deadline. The stabilization work will be performed for the Department of the Interior National Park Service within Cuyahoga Valley National Park in Brecksville, Ohio.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(x)
140P2022R0048 x x
1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR
OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
x
PDS
Denver CO 80225-0287 P.O. Box 25287 12795 W. Alameda Pkwy DOI, NPS, DSC Contracting Services
PDS
Denver CO 80225-0287 P.O. Box 25287 12795 W. Alameda Pkwy NPS, DSC Contracting Services Div
05/23/20220001
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
FACILITY CODE CODE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY
PAGE OF PAGES
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
04/22/2022
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.
ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
CUVA 224822 - Cuyahoga Valley - Riverbank Stabilization Project - Cuyahoga Valley National
Park, Brecksville, Ohio - Design-Build-GAOA
The purpose of this amendment is provide responses to the questions that have been received to date and to provide the cut off date for receipt of questions.
Q1. Attachment #4 - past performance questionnaire, page 3 of 3 directs contacts to return the form to Bruce Beck by October 18, 2021. This seems to be incorrect information, can you please provide the form with the correct information and date for return?
A1. The corrected form is attached.
Continued ...
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
Joseph Halter
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Previous edition unusable
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .
ITEM NO. SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
NAME OF OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR
2 2
CONTINUATION SHEET
REFERENCE NO. OF DOCUMENT BEING CONTINUED PAGE OF
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
140P2022R0048/0001
Q2. Please clarify how the request for Factor 2:
Specialized Experience and Technical Competence
Similar in Size, Scope and Complexity and Factor
3: Past Performance on Relevant Projects differ?
It appears that both request the Attachment 3
Project Experience and seem to seek information on the team's past performance.
A2. Please see Section M - Evaluation Process -
Phase 1 - Factor 2 and Factor 3.
Q3. Please let us know if the Unequivocable
Letters of Commitment should be submitted as appendices or with Factor 1 and if they are excluded from any page count limitations.
A3. The letters shall with submitted with Factor
1 and they are excluded from the page count.
Q4. Please clarify the return requirements for
Attachment 4 - currently, it asks that references return to the PPQ by 2PM on 10/18/2021 to Bruce
Beck at Bruce_Beck@nps.gov.
A4. The PPQ has been corrected and is attached.
The cutoff date for the receipt of questions is
June 1, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. Mountain Time.
NSN 7540-01-152-8067 OPTIONAL FORM 336 (4-86)
Sponsored by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.110
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code XXXXX DUNS Number XXXXXXX Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone
B. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Project Title Title Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description
C. REFERENCE:
Name First, Last Position / Title Title Organization Agency or Company Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX Email Address Email Signature Signature Date XX/XX/XXXX
D. EVALUATION
Rating Definition
Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area Rating Quality
Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Schedule (& Time Management) Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Cost Control
Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Management General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):
Regulatory Compliance Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.
Overall Comments:
E. RETURN:
Return by 2:00 pm on June 8, 2022 Name Vicki Freese-Supler Title Contract Specialist Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center Email vicki_l_freese-supler@nps.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .