CACL 148702 Preproposal_0002.pptx

PPTX presentation 5 MB Posted

Attached to
Castle Clinton National Monument, New York, NY
Solicitation number
140P2020R0052
Issued by

About this file

This document provides details for a solicitation seeking proposals to restore historic walls at Castle Clinton National Monument in New York, New York. The National Park Service is soliciting proposals for exterior and structural restoration of the historic stone walls, including cleaning, repairing, repointing, and replacing stone as needed. Proposals are due by July 20, 2020 with award estimated for September 11, 2020. The contract will be a firm fixed price contract for an initial period of performance of 560 calendar days. The solicitation includes a base requirement as well as thirteen options that may be awarded. Proposals will be evaluated on experience with historic masonry projects, technical approach, schedule, and past performance. Small business participation goals and subcontracting plans are required.

View the file

Other files

Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Pre-Proposal Teleconference & Virtual Site Visit

CASTLE CLINTON NATIONAL MONUMENT RESTORE HISTORIC WALLS

Solicitation: 140P2020R0052

NPS PMIS #: CACL 148702

THIS MEETING WILL BE RECORDED

JUNE 30, 2020

E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A

OPENING

INTRODUCTIONS

ATTENDEE’S LIST WILL BE INCLUDED IN AN AMENDMENT

PURPOSE OF THE PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE/VIRTUAL SITE VISIT

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE QUESTIONS

AFTER PRESENTATION IS COMPLETE – PLEASE DIRECT QUESTIONS VIA E-MAIL TO BOTH CONTRACTING OFFICER and CONTRACT SPECIALIST victoria_nosal@nps.gov and tracy_mcconner@nps.gov.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WILL BE ISSUED BY A FORMAL AMENDMENT

Castle Clinton Southwest Battery

SCOPE OF WORK

This Project will stabilize, conserve, repair, and restore the historic stone walls of CACL. This project includes new capping of the wall where necessary, correcting negative drainage at the hardscape, stabilization, restoration and conservation treatment of this historic and irreplaceable cultural resource. This will be accomplished through cleaning, replacement, pinning and repointing throughout the historic fabric. All original fabric will be retained and conserved.

LOCATION: NEW YORK

https://earth.google.com/earth/rpc/cc/drive?state=%7B%22ids%22%3A%5B%221dCnPqecamdf4UdiC0Ijrmqm5-yipyRwi%22%5D%2C%22action%22%3A%22open%22%2C%22userId%22%3A%22106159393745107033486%22%7D&usp=sharing

TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS

CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS

SPECIFICATIONS

INTERIOR PHOTO WALKTHROUGH AND PICTURES

INTERIOR VIDEO (POSTED VIA AMENDMENT 2)

DRAWINGS

SPECIFICATIONS

INTERIOR PHOTO

WALKTHOUGH

AND NOTES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO.140P2020R0052

SOLICITATION AND AWARD INFORMATION

PRE PROPOSAL MEETING – June 30, 2020 PRE PROPOSAL QUESTION CUTOFF DAY– July 9, 2020 3:00 PM MST OFFERS DUE – July 20, 2020 3:00 PM MST SECTION L – 52.216-01 – Type of Contract – Firm Fixed Price NAICS Code: 236220 - Small Business Size Standard: $39.5M Full and Open Competitive Procurement Large Business are required to set aside 20% of total contract for small business and provide a small business subcontracting plan 560 calendar day period of performance from (estimated) notice to proceed Notice of award (estimated) to be on or around September 11, 2020

BASIS FOR AWARD

The Government will conduct a source selection using the Best Value Continuum Tradeoff Process defined at FAR Part 15.1. The Contracting Officer (CO) will obligate and award a contract to the offeror who submits a proposal the Source Selection Authority (SSA) determines conforms to solicitation requirements; is fair and reasonable; and provides the best value to the government considering all evaluation factors combined as detailed below. For this acquisition, the CO is the SSA.

2. The Government may accept other than the lowest priced proposal when the perceived benefits of a higher priced proposal merit the price differential.

3. Additionally, pursuant to FAR 52.215-1(f), Contract Award, contained herein:

The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government’s interest.

The Government may waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the CO later determines them to be necessary.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Proposals shall be submitted via email. Proposals submitted via any means other than email shall not be accepted.

Proposals shall be sent to:

CS_DSC_Proposal_Submission@nps.gov Title subject line for all proposal submissions Subj: 140P2020R0052, CACL 148702, email 1 of 3 Submit proposals in separage Volumes (I and II) in the Formats specified, containing Contents required. Each volume shall be submitted in separate email attachments.

Size limits:

a. Individual email attachments shall be no larger than 38MB.
b. Each email shall be no larger than 100 MB.

Offers shall verify receipt of proposals.

VOLUME I, TECHNICAL PROPOSAL – FORMAT, ORGANIZATION, CONTENTS

FORMAT: Submit one (1) electronic copy to

ORGANIZATION: Include a Table of Contents:

FACTOR 1 – EXPERIENCE (Subfactors are approximately equal in importance):

Subfactor 1A – Project Experience
Subfactor 1B – Key Personnel Experience

FACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL APPROACH AND SCHEDULE (Subfactors are of descending importance).

Subfactor 2A – Technical Approach
Subfactor 2B- Schedule

FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE

OTHER SUBMITTALS (to be include in the Business Proposal): PROPOSED EQUALS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

Factor 1: EXPERIENCE Subfactor 1-A Project Experience: Submit the solicitation's "Project Experience" form addressing specific experience elements below for up to five (5) relevant projects completed in the last five (5) years. Submit separate forms for each project. NOTE: Submit the same project information for Past Performance (FACTOR ) as submitted under this factor. Relevant project experience includes the following:

Historic Masonry and Sheetmetal Construction Experience Experience as a prime contractor working with the proposed team (key personnel and key subcontractors)

Subfactor 1-B Key Personnel Experience: Submit resumes for key personnel as identified in Section H of this solicitation and listed below. All personnel proposed are subject to substitution requirements contained in this solicitation

Project Manager, Superintendent, Quality Control Supervisor, Historic Masonry Foreman, Historic Sheet Metal Forman

Factor 1 EXPERIENCE Subfactor 1A: PROJECT EXPERIENCE

Project experience demonstrating (1) capability to successfully completed relevant projects of similar scope and magnitude to this solicitation; (2) strong technical knowledge and skill required for this solicitation; (3) similar project experience performed in-house or with the proposed major subcontractor/s may be considered more favorably; and (4) similar experience completed in large metropolitan areas with heavy pedestrian traffic management on sites of National and Historic significance may be considered more favorably. Those not demonstrating these attributes present higher levels of risk and will be rated less favorably.

NOTE: The same projects evaluated for experience under this factor shall also be evaluated for Past Performance (FACTOR 3). Projects determined more relevant under this factor will be given more weight in the Past Performance evaluation.

Factor 1 EXPERIENCE Subfactor 1B: KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE

Key Personnel experience demonstrating capability in same or similar key personnel positions on successful relevant projects of similar scope and magnitude to this solicitation; (2) strong technical knowledge and skill required for this solicitation; and (3) experience working on sites of National and Historic significance may be rate more favorably. Those not demonstrating these attributes present higher levels of risk and will be less favorably rated.

Factor 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH & SCHEDULE Subfactor 2A Technical Approach Technical approach is your means and methods to complete a technical aspect of required work in this solicitation. Submit a written narrative describing your technical approach to the specific elements below: There is no preprinted form for this submittal.

Approach to Critical Contract Requirements: Demonstrate a clear understanding of the project scope and offer realistic strategies and methods for successfully completing the project. Consider any unique aspects related to scope, and creative and innovative ideas to execute the project in an expeditious manner.

Risk Analysis: Submit a risk analysis identifying critical issues, potential problems, and/or areas of concern with recommended solutions. Include strategies, at a minimum, to manage project risks such as logistical challenges; pedestrian traffic control and management; obtaining long-lead items from identified sources and winter weather considerations.

Subfactor 2A Technical Approach continued:

Natural/Cultural/Historic Protection & Preservation Plan: Describe your approach to protection and preservation of natural/cultural/historic resources as required in the solicitation. Include a discussion on your understanding of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation for the treatment of Historic Property as it relates to this project. Include a discussion on the requirements in Specification Section 013591, Historic Preservation Treatment Procedures.

Technical approaches that comply with applicable contract requirements; are realistic, appropriate, and efficient; and demonstrate clear logic and scope understanding present lower levels of risk and will be more favorably rated. Technical approaches demonstrating a clear understanding of the identified risks and a realistic approach to address them will be rated more favorably. Technical approaches demonstrating a complete understanding of natural, cultural and historic preservation and protection requirements will be more favorably rated. Technical Approaches not demonstrating these attributes present higher levels of risk and will be less favorably rated.

Subfactor 2B Schedule:

Submit your proposed construction schedule for this specific project showing completion within the required period of performance contained in this solicitation with accompanying schedule narrative. Submit your schedule in MS Project Gantt Chart format; assume a Notice to Proceed Date of October 1, 2020; and include specific activities required for this project and a clear critical path with major milestones and appropriate float. In your accompanying narrative, explain schedule logic, critical path activities, and key considerations and constraints. Describe and evaluate the possibility of a winter shutdown vs temporary environmental controls to continue work through the winter months and the associated changes in completion dates. Project schedule and narrative should support Technical Approach.

There is not preprinted form for this submittal.

Subfactor 2B Schedule:

Construction schedules and narrative descriptions documenting (1) clear and efficient critical path and logical sequencing; (2) account for procurement lead-time, subcontractor/trade coordination, on-site storage and staging, resource and time constraints; and (3) demonstrate risk mitigation and successful completion within the required period of performance present lower levels of risk and will be more favorably rated. Schedules which do not demonstrate these attributes present higher levels of risk and will be less favorably rated.

Factor 3: PAST PERFORMANCE Submit Past Performance information for the same projects submitted under Project Experience (Subfactor 1A) using the attached Past Performance Questionnaire. Information may be regarding the offeror's firm and/or its proposed major subcontractors performing key trades and/or other construction activities.

Subcontractor past performance will only be considered if it correlates to the work the subcontractor will be performing on this requirement. If available, offerors may submit a Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) evaluation report in lieu of the Past Performance Questionaire.

Factor 3: PAST PERFORMANCE (continued) Submittal process for the Past Performance Questionnaire is as follows:

Complete Section A (Contractor Information) and B (Contract Information) only of the attached Past Performance Questionnaire and forward to your client reference. The reference shall be someone who was substantially involved with the project and can provide a complete, objective assessment of your performance. Direct them to complete and submit the survey to the email addresses and point of contacts noted in Section E. of the questionnaire by the due date and time for proposal receipt.

Submit copies of the questionnaire that you forwarded to your references with their questionnaire Section C (Reference) point of contact information in Technical Proposal Volume I.

Submit a narrative disclosing any instances of past performance that may be considered less than fully satisfactory. Describe pertinent facts, circumstances and any remedial action taken or to be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to disclose such instances could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror's past performance record. The offeror shall be responsible for any follow-up communication required to ensure that all the forms are completed by the reference and are emailed to the NPS point of contacts no later than the date and time proposals are due.

Factor 3: PAST PERFORMANCE (continued) The TEP will evaluate past performance of offerors on projects provided in the Project Experience section (FACTOR 1) and on contracts with the Federal Government, other public agencies, or private organizations. Past performance demonstrating higher levels of success and quality on more relevant projects similar in scope and magnitude to this solicitation present lower levels of risk and will be more favorably rated. Project Experience ratings (Factor 1) will be considered in determining relevancy for projects submitted under this factor. If an offeror has no past performance on similar work relevant to this solicitation, they will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. All submitted references may not be contacted. Sources other than submitted references may be contacted.

During proposal evaluations, exchanges between the Government and offerors may occur to clarify the relevance of past performance information and/or address adverse past performance information which an offeror has not yet had an opportunity to respond to.

EVALUATION FACTORS

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE: Factors 1 and 2 are of equal importance. Relative importance of subfactors are noted within each related Factor below. Factor 3 Past Performance is less important that Factors 1 and 2 when combined.

Overall: All evaluation factors other than price (technical and past performance), when combined are significantly more important than price.

VOLUME II, BUSINESS AND PRICE PROPOSAL – SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION: Include a Table of Contents with tabs for hard copy formats and folders and files for electronic formats named as follows:

SF1442

AMENDMENTS

SECTION B PRICE SCHEDULE

SF 24 BID BOND

SECTION K REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

GENERAL REFERENCES

SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

VOLUME II, BUSINESS AND PRICE PROPOSAL – FORMAT, ORGANIZATION, CONTENTS

(continued) SF1442: Standard Form 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award, (Construction, Alteration, or Repair): Complete blocks 14 through 20C only. An official having the authority to contractually bind the offeror’s company must sign the SF 1442 in accordance with the procedures prescribed in FAR 4.102. The SF-1442 will be reviewed for completeness.

AMENDMENTS: Acknowledge all solicitation amendments using one of the methods set forth in Block 11 of Standard Form 30. Amendment acknowledgements will be reviewed for timely and proper acknowledgement.

SECTION B CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE: Enter the proposed dollar amount for each line item in the Price Schedule, including any optional items, if applicable. Proposed pricing will be evaluated for fair and reasonableness. Reasonableness will be determined considering comparisons to competitive pricing and to the independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE). Proposed pricing that differs significantly from the competition or IGCE will be reviewed to assess potential performance risk and the offeror’s understanding of contract requirements. If multiple contract line items are included in the price schedule, prices will be evaluated to determine whether any line items are unbalanced. Offerors are cautioned to distribute costs appropriately.

VOLUME II, BUSINESS AND PRICE PROPOSAL – FORMAT, ORGANIZATION, CONTENTS

(continued) SF 24 BID BOND: Submit Standard Form 24, Bid Bond duly executed between the offeror and the bonding company. Refer to clause 52.228-1.

SECTION K REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS: Submit a completed copy of provision 52.204-8 shown in section “K” of this solicitation. Complete all required representations and certifications if they are not available at www.SAM.gov. Your firm must maintain current, active registration at www.SAM.gov to be eligible for award and you are encouraged to complete SAM registration before submitting your offer.

GENERAL REFERENCES: Complete and submit the attached “General References,” form. Information will be used in determining Responsibility pursuant to FAR 9.103.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN: Large businesses will only be considered for award if they submit an acceptable Small Business Subcontracting Plan. Plans that meet or exceed the NPS small business subcontracting goals and are otherwise compliant with FAR Part 19.705 shall be considered acceptable.

CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE

Contract Line Item (CLIN)CLIN TitleQtyUnit of MeasureUnit PriceTotal Price
1Exterior Restoration
2Structural Survey Installation
3
4
5
6
Contract Line Item (CLIN)CLIN TitleQtyUnit of MeasureUnit PriceTotal Price
1Exterior Restoration1Lump Sum
2Structural Survey Installation1Lump Sum
TOTAL BASE PRICE (Contract Line Item Number 1 – 2)--------------------------------------------
3Option 1, Interior Stone Restoration1Lump Sum
4Option 2, Lightning Protection1Lump Sum
5Option 3, Embrasure Grill Restoration28Each
6Option 4, Additional Stone Retooling2500SF
7Option 5, Additional Stone Repointing (deep)1000LF
8Option 6, Additional Stone Patching repair type B 3500SF

CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE cont.

CLINCLIN TitleQtyUnit of MeasureUnit PriceTotal Price
9Option 7, Additional Stone Crack Repair300LF
10Option 8, Additional Stone Dutchman Full Face Veneer (24’x12’x6’)60Each
11Option 9, Additional Treatment Type C750LOC
12Option 10, Secondary Cleaning, Efflorescence1000SF
13Option 11, Secondary Cleaning, Calcite Deposits400SF
14Option 12, Additional Stone Replacement (24’x12’x12’)10Each
15Option 13, Cold Weather Construction16weeks
TOTAL PRICE FOR ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Items Numbers 3-15)-----------------------
TOTAL PRICE – BASE PLUS ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Item Numbers 1 – 15----------
All measurement and payment information is included in the project specifications, Section 012700

QUESTIONS AFTER PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

DIRECT ALL QUESTIONS TO Victoria Nosal and Tracy McConner, BY E-MAIL: Victoria_nosal@nps.gov; tracy_mcconner@nps.gov.

ALL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS BY AMENDMENT TO THE SOLICITATION.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (SOLICITATION DOCUMENT) SHALL ONLY BE CHANGED BY FORMAL AMENDMENT ISSUED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER AT THE WEBSITE beta.sam.gov.

Cut-off day for questions is July 9, 2020

Thank You For Your Interest in This Project E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A

National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior image2.jpeg image3.jpeg image4.emf image5.emf image6.emf

REPAIR HISTORIC WALLS AT CASTLE CLINTON - PMIS 148702

INTERIOR PHOTO WALKTHROUGH

JGWA 06/17/20

10 11

*21

*PHOTO 21 TAKEN

FROM BASEMENT

LEVEL

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 01

FACING WEST AT PUBLIC ENTRANCE, LOOKING TOWARD

PUBLIC EXIT AT OPPOSITE END.

FLAG POLE

KIOSKS

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 02

LOOKING UPWARD AT BROWNSTONE LINTEL AND IRON STRAP

AT PUBLIC ENTRANCE.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 03

FACING EAST AT CENTER OF INTERIOR, LOOKING TOWARD

PUBLIC ENTRANCE AND WEST ELEVATIONS OF SALLY PORT

AND CHIMNEYS ABOVE.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 04

FACING SOUTH TOWARD INTERIOR WALL AT EMBRASURES #33 AND #34,

LOOKING AT ACCESSORY SHED STRUCTURE. NOTE THAT WORK AREA

BETWEEN WALL AND SHED IS LIMITED (SEE IMAGE 15). WORK AT

INTERIOR WALL SHALL BE COORDINATED AROUND EXISTING SHED TO

BE PROTECTED IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 05

INTERFACE OF BROWNSTONE AND BRICK WALL AT

SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BUILDING.

EXISTING DOWNLEAD/

GROUND ROD FOR

LIGHTNING PROTECTION

SYSTEM

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 06

FACING SOUTHEAST TOWARD INTERIOR WALL AT

EMBRASURES #31 AND #32, LOOKING AT WOOD FENCING TO

BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 07

FACING SOUTHEAST TOWARD INTERIOR WALL AT

EMBRASURES #29 AND #30, LOOKING AT WOOD FENCING AND

BENCHES TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION. WALL-

MOUNTED SIGNS TO BE REMOVED AND REINSTALLED.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 08

VERTICAL CRACK AT INTERIOR WALL BETWEEN

EMBRASURES #25 AND #26.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 09

FACING WEST AT PUBLIC EXIT, LOOKING AT INTERIOR

WALL BETWEEN EMBRASURES #19 AND #21.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 10

FACING WEST AT PUBLIC EXIT, LOOKING AT INTERIOR

WALL BETWEEN EMBRASURES #18 AND #19 AND

BENCHES TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 11

OPEN JOINTS AT INTERIOR WALL BELOW

EMBRASURE #19.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 12

TYPICAL ANCHOR DETAIL AT EMBRASURE GRILLE.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 13

FACING NORTH TOWARD INTERIOR WALL AT EMBRASURES #12 AND #13,

LOOKING AT ACCESSORY SHED STRUCTURE. NOTE THAT WORK AREA

BETWEEN WALL AND SHED IS LIMITED (SEE IMAGE 15). WORK AT INTERIOR

WALL SHALL BE COORDINATED AROUND EXISTING SHED TO BE PROTECTED

IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 14

FACING NORTH TOWARD INTERIOR WALL BETWEEN EMBRASURES #11

AND #12. NOTE LIMITED WORK AREA (APPROX. 26" WIDE) BETWEEN

SHEDS AND BUTTRESS. WORK AT INTERIOR WALL SHALL BE

COORDINATED AROUND EXISTING SHEDS TO BE PROTECTED IN

PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

EXISTING DOWNLEAD/

GROUND ROD FOR

LIGHTNING PROTECTION

SYSTEM

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 15

TYPICAL SPACE BETWEEN INTERIOR WALL AND ACCESSORY

SHED STRUCTURE APPROXIMATELY 26" WIDE. WORK AT

INTERIOR WALL SHALL BE COORDINATED AROUND EXISTING

SHED TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 16

FACING NORTHEAST TOWARD INTERIOR WALL AT EMBRASURES #06 AND #07,

LOOKING AT ACCESSORY SHED STRUCTURE. NOTE THAT WORK AREA

BETWEEN WALL AND SHED IS LIMITED (SEE IMAGE 15). WORK AT INTERIOR

WALL SHALL BE COORDINATED AROUND EXISTING SHED TO BE PROTECTED

IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 17

FACING EAST TOWARD INTERIOR BRICK WALL OF NORTH MAGAZINE.

TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS BY CONTRACTOR TO BE

LOCATED IN ELECTRICAL ROOM ON RIGHT. BRICK WALLS NOT IN SCOPE.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 18

DETAIL OF ELECTRICAL PANEL 01

WITHIN NORTH MAGAZINE.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 19

DETAIL OF ELECTRICAL PANEL 02

WITHIN NORTH MAGAZINE.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 20

NORTHEAST STAIR TO BASEMENT SPACE BELOW.

TEMPORARY WATER CONNECTIONS BY CONTRACTOR TO BE

LOCATED IN BASEMENT.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 21

BASEMENT LEVEL FACING WEST TOWARD BASEMENT ENTRANCE ON

RIGHT. TEMPORARY WATER CONNECTIONS BY CONTRACTOR TO BE

LOCATED IN BASEMENT.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 22

FACING WEST AT EAST END OF WOOD SHINGLE ROOF,

LOOKING DOWN TOWARD PUBLIC EXIT AT OPPOSITE END.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 23

FACING SOUTH AT EAST END OF WOOD SHINGLE ROOF,

LOOKING AT WEST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS OF SALLY

PORT AND CHIMNEYS.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 24

EXISTING LEAD FLASHING, AIR TERMINAL, AND SPEAKERS

AT PARAPET WALL, TYPICAL.

CASTLE CLINTON - JGWA IMAGE 25

DETERIORATED BROWNSTONE AT TOP FACE OF COPING

STONES ALONG EXTERIOR FACE OF PARAPET WALL.

image7.png image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .