Questions_and_Answers_0001.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Smith's Fork Bridge Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L0621R0032
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding a federal solicitation for the Smith's Fork Bridge Replacement project. The Bureau of Land Management is seeking to replace an existing bridge located 11 miles northeast of the intersection of HWY 89 and State HWY 232 in Cokeville, Wyoming. The new bridge will be constructed at the same location as the current bridge. The size standard for small businesses bidding on NAICS code 237310 for this project is $39.5 million. Attendees at the mandatory site visit included representatives from Alfaro Engineering and Triple A Building Services.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Smith_s_Fork_Bridge_Route_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L0621R0032_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Attch_3__Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Attch_2__Project_Map.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L0621R0032.pdf | ||
| Attch_4_PP_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch_1__Specifications.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers
Question: Please provide directions to the site.
Answer: At the intersection of HWY 89 and State HWY 232, just south of the Flying J Travel Plaza in Cokeville, WY, turn east on State Hwy 232. Stay on Hwy 232 going east to northeast, then north for approximately 11 miles where pavement ends. Stay on BLM road 4213 at the end of pavement, beginning gravel road for approximately 8 miles to the existing Smith’s Fork Bridge. (map attached)
Question: Where will the new bridge be located?
Answer: The new bridge will replace the current one at the same location.
Question: In response to Phase I, Volume 2 & 3 requirements, can you clarify if successful past performance of the contractor and designer-of-record on the same project be a design-build project?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Can section L-9 be changed to remove the requirement of “At least one project must be one in which the general contractor and designer-of-record both worked to successfully complete the same project.” The proposed language would be, five recent projects of similar complexity and size magnitude completed by the GC and DOR.
Answer: Section L-9 remains unchanged.
Question: Please clarify the small business size standard for 237310.
Answer: The size standard is $39.5M.
Site Visit Attendees
Alfaro Engineering Triple A Building Services
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .