B09_Amendment_1_RFI_Doc_0001.pdf
PDF 82 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GAOA - Canal Restoration Project at San Luis NWR
- Solicitation number
- 140F0822R0004
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to a Request for Information (RFI) for a canal restoration project at the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge. Key details include that work performed as a subcontractor will be considered for past project experience, but may not be ranked as favorably as prime contractor experience. Additionally, the document confirms that a refuge water tower scope of work is no longer part of the project and related information should be disregarded, as this work was separated into a separate project during an initial 35% design review.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI’s for RFP – Canal Restoration Project at San Luis :
Section: SECTION M--EVALUATION CRITERIA, M.3 Evaluation Factors, FACTOR 1 – EXPERIENCE states that: “For a project to be considered, the offeror shall have been the Prime Contractor on it”.
Question: Request that key subcontractor past performance may meet this requirement
Answer: Work performed as a subcontractor will be considered but may not be ranked as favorably as prime contractor experience.
Question 2
3_A06_35 Design Specs
Section: SECTION 01 11 00 - SUMMARY OF WORK, PART 1 – GENERAL, 1.2 B 3 States the following: “Refuge Water Tower includes demolition of an existing poly tank and concrete saddle supports and abandonment of buried piping.
The contractor shall furnish and install a new Water Tower, backflow preventer, and buried piping.”
Question: At that site visit, it was mentioned that this work has been removed from this project.
Please confirm it has been removed in references here and in the drawings along with any other scopes of work that may have been removed.
Answer:
At the site visit, it was in fact confirmed that refuge water tower is not part of this project. Please disregard this information. It was included as part of the initial 35% design review completed but then was separated into a separate project.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .