Revised 1 - Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 398 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M222QNMAN0074
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractors on a NOAA ship drydock repair solicitation. The questionnaire includes ratings on quality of service, schedule, and management for a reference contract. Respondents are to evaluate a contractor's past performance on quality, timeliness, and integration/coordination on prior work. The ratings range from exceptional to unsatisfactory with definitions provided. The completed questionnaire must be returned to the identified contracting specialist by July 26, 2022.
The related federal contract opportunity is for drydock repairs to the NOAA ship Bell M. Shimada in FY2023. The solicitation is being conducted by the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. No further details on required work, response date, or award date are provided in the opportunity description.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M222QNMAN0074
Attachment: III
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________ (Contract number of the
Past Performance this information is based on)
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Kelani Lawrence no later than July 26, 2022 at 4:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time (EDT):
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the
Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the
Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________
Rater’s Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Kelani Lawrence, no later than July 26, 2022 at 4:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time (EDT):
Kelani.Lawrence@noaa.gov mailto:Kelani.Lawrence@noaa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .