S06_Evaluation Factors_12FPC421Q0005_10FEB2021.pdf
PDF 170 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Helicopter Charter Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12FPC421Q0005
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Questions Answers_12FPC421Q0005.pdf | ||
| Pricing Schedule_12FPC421Q0005.pdf | ||
| Evaluation Factors_12FPC421Q0005.pdf | ||
| PWS_Helicopter Charter Services.pdf | ||
| 12FPC421Q0005 Combined Synopsis Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation
The government is conducting this evaluation in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 13.106-2(b) Evaluation of quotations & offers.
Basis for Award
The Government intends to award a Time & Materials contract for a 12-month base period plus two 12-month option periods. Award will be made to the offeror having an acceptable technical evaluation and the lowest price. To be technically acceptable, Factor 1 must receive an acceptable rating. Factor 2 will be evaluated based on the below criteria and overall total price.
Evaluation factors and criteria
Factor 1 – Technical
The Offeror’s proposal must show a clear understanding of the requirement as defined in the PWS and demonstrate this as follows:
Personnel Qualifications: Detailed resume of experience and qualifications regarding Mountain Flying & Snow Operations (deep snow) Operations and maintenance plan Aircraft capabilities and condition (helicopter hours/engine hours).
Location where the helicopter is based Quality Control Plan
The Offeror’s proposal must be responsive, complete, realistic and workable.
The rating for technical portion is as follows:
Acceptable Meets specified minimum performance or capability requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance
Unacceptable (Unacceptable ratings are not awardable)
Fails to meet specified minimum performance or capability requirements. The proposal is lacking in a certain area(s) of the requirements and cannot reasonably be expected to be made acceptable during any subsequent negotiation.
Factor 2 – Price
The price will be evaluated against the following criteria:
1. Realism: Proposed pricing must be realistic for the requirement.
2. Clear understanding: Pricing must reflect a clear understanding of the contract requirements.
3. Inclusive: Pricing must be inclusive of all requested services, including option periods and totals.
Evaluation Factors for 12FPC421Q0005_Helicopter Charter Services
-------------------------- 2/10/2021
Price inconsistencies: Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between promised performance and price, must be explained in the proposal. Any significant inconsistencies, if unexplained, raise a fundamental issue of the Offerors understanding of the nature and scope of work required and the offeror’s financial ability to perform the contract, and may be grounds for rejection of the proposal.
Unbalanced pricing: The government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, one or more contract line items is significantly overstated or understated.
Options: The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .